Most critics do not like this film, and many dislike it a good deal. Ten of seventeen reviews are negative, and the complaint is much the same each time: Daldry’s adaptation treats grief after the 9/11 attacks as an occasion for sentiment rather than reflection, and the boy’s quest across New York with a key strikes them as contrived and cute. Where there is praise, it lands on the cast. Thomas Horn’s performance as Oskar is singled out by several reviews as natural and matter-of-fact, and Max von Sydow and Sandra Bullock are credited with steadying the supporting scenes.
The spread is wide. The Los Angeles Times and The Wrap find the film moving and its handling of loss humane; The AV Club and The Guardian consider it preposterous and mawkish, and the former gives it a failing grade. Even admirers concede Daldry lays the sentiment on thick, and Horn divides opinion, with some finding his idiosyncrasies grating rather than endearing.
L
Los Angeles Times
23 December 2011 · Betsy Sharkey
80*
Daldry sensitively adapts the story through a precocious boy's eyes, balancing sentiment and substance while exploring grief and healing on a human level.
Read the full review →F
Film Comment
1 January 2012 · Nicolas Rapold
70*
The film is a surprisingly engaging adaptation of the novel about a precocious boy dealing with his father's death in the 9/11 attacks. Its chief strength is the passionate portrayal by newcomer Thomas Horn as the boy Oskar.
Read the full review →H
The Hollywood Reporter
18 December 2011 · Todd McCarthy
70*
The film is an affecting, well-acted tale of 9/11 trauma centered on a boy's quest to process his father's death. The standout element is the exceptional natural performance by young lead Thomas Horn.
Read the full review →N
The New York Times
22 December 2011 · Manohla Dargis
40*
The movie treats 9/11 as kitsch rather than occasion for mourning or reflection, turning the boy's quest into a sentimental journey through New York aided by its people.
Read the full review →R
RogerEbert.com
18 January 2012 · Roger Ebert
30*
The film is contrivance and folderol built around a boy's improbable quest across New York with a key and tambourine. It fails to provide plausible or meaningful catharsis for 9/11.
Read the full review →S
Screen Daily
19 December 2011
30*
The film is seen as a preening and contrived exercise in manipulative poignancy, overly mannered despite skilled craft and strong supporting performances, existing mainly to elicit feelings rather than tell a story.
Read the full review →T
Time Out
23 September 2011 · Ben Walters
30*
The critic finds the adaptation overly sentimental and platitudinous in its account of trauma, offering a cutesy fantasy of New York rather than a genuine exploration of communication and loss.
Read the full review →S
Slant Magazine
23 December 2011 · ★/4 · R. Kurt Osenlund
25
The film is a needlessly self-important and hugely artificial post-9/11 weepie that buries its soul beneath pretentious rubble. The critic singles out the grating, contrived idiosyncrasies of the child protagonist and the shameless, predestined melodrama for complaint.
Read the full review →G
The Guardian
16 February 2012 · ★ · Peter Bradshaw
20
The critic finds the film a contrived and preposterous mawkish fantasy that belittles the impact of 9/11 through its sentimental treatment of the boy's quest.
Read the full review →E
Evening Standard
25 July 2012
15*
The critic describes the film as a shameless tearjerker that relentlessly ratchets up the pathos around a young boy's 9/11-related quest but ultimately leaves the viewer unmoved and resistant. It singles out the manipulative emotional design, over-cute elements, and lack of genuine engagement with its subject for complaint.
Read the full review →A
The AV Club
22 December 2011 · F · Scott Tobias
15
The adaptation is an appalling, nauseatingly precious treatment of 9/11 grief that feels both too literary and too sentimental. The critic singles out the cloying conceit of the boy's quest and the overly tasteful yet manipulative direction and score for complaint.
Read the full review →W
The Wrap
22 December 2011 · Leah Rozen
80*
The critic calls the film a moving drama about one boy's efforts to make sense of his father's death in the 9/11 attacks, praising the streamlined adaptation from the novel and strong performances, particularly the eccentric but effective work by newcomer Thomas Horn along with Tom Hanks, Sandra Bullock and Max von Sydow.
Read the full review →C
Collider
24 December 2011 · B · Matt Goldberg
77
The critic finds the film ultimately moving thanks to Daldry's direction, which makes the odd elements and 9/11 backdrop work together for an emotional impact, despite an off-putting child performance initially.
Read the full review →D
Den of Geek
9 February 2012 · ★★★ · Carley Tauchert
60
The beautifully shot and acted drama hits emotions repeatedly but lacks soul in addressing the tragic subject. It is a good, solid drama that honors the grief process but leaves one thinking more about real events than the fictional characters.
Read the full review →D
Digital Spy
13 February 2012 · ★★★ · Stella Papamichael
60
Daldry lays it on thick with sentiment but the newcomer Thomas Horn provides a saving grace with his matter-of-fact performance that helps cut through the saccharine. The journey is engaging but long, uneven, and undermined by overly tidy resolutions.
Read the full review →E
Eye for Film
17 February 2012 · Donald Munro
40*
The critic finds a good film buried under excessive sentiment, self-indulgence, and unnecessary length. They single out the strong performances by Max von Sydow and Sandra Bullock for praise, while noting the contrived plot and stereotypical portrayal of the protagonist.
Read the full review →P
Paste
29 December 2011 · 5.8 · Ani Vrabel
30*
The film relies too heavily on sentimentality about 9/11 and loss without sufficient character development or storytelling merit, resulting in a disappointing adaptation that feels annoying rather than endearing.
Read the full review →Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate