Critics’ reviews

Fantasia 2000 (2000)

11 reviews from 11 publications. Critics’ score 60: 4 positive, 5 mixed, 2 negative.

Back to our review of Fantasia 2000

60
Positive
4
Mixed
5
Negative
2

Most critics take Fantasia 2000 as a respectable follow-up to the original: lighter, shorter and more polished, if less ambitious. The praise clusters on the animation itself. Reviews single out the graceful blend of computer imagery with hand-drawn work, the flying whales in “Pines of Rome”, the gleefully silly flamingos, and above all the Steadfast Tin Soldier segment, which even the film’s detractors admire. Several find it entertaining for children and adults alike.

The reservations gather around weight and framing. Several critics find the anthology too lightweight to deliver the impact of the original, and the celebrity introductions are a recurring complaint, described as distracting or self-congratulating. The spread is wide, running from strongly positive to dismissive. Empire calls it more successful than the original but not worth the long wait. The Guardian finds the cartoons dull and poorly matched to the music, while Eye for Film finds the sentimentality overbearing yet still credits the artistry of the shorts.

Slant Magazine
5 December 2010 · ★★★★ · Eric Henderson
80

The critic considers Fantasia 2000 a worthy successor, trading the original’s weight for wit, polish, and variety. The flying-whale sequence in “Pines of Rome” earns praise for its direction and synchronization with the music.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
16 June 2000 · Joshua Klein
70*

Klein finds Fantasia 2000 a successful return to the original’s pleasures, entertaining for children and adults alike. He praises the graceful integration of computer imagery with traditional animation, while faulting one sequence and the distracting celebrity introductions.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
64*

The page content is blocked, so the critic’s verdict cannot be verified. No praise or complaint can be reliably identified from the available text.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
31 December 1999
64*

The page content is inaccessible, so the critic’s verdict cannot be established. No specific praise or complaint is available to report.

Read the full review →
Time Out
· TCh
63*

The review describes the film as a belated sequel. Its description singles out Mickey Mouse’s segment from the original as a standout.

Read the full review →
Variety
22 December 1999 · Todd McCarthy
60*

McCarthy finds the anthology enjoyable but too lightweight to deliver the satisfying impact of the original. He especially praises the Steadfast Tin Soldier segment for its brilliant direction, animation, and vivid characters.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · David Parkinson
50*

Parkinson finds Fantasia 2000 a mixed bag that is more successful than the original but does not justify the long wait. He praises the inventive, gleefully silly flamingo segment and the film’s breathtaking spectacle, while faulting weaker episodes and dated caricaturing.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
26 May 2000 · Peter Bradshaw
25*

Bradshaw gives the film a negative verdict. He singles out the cartoons as dull and poorly matched to the music.

Read the full review →
HeyUGuys
6 December 2010 · Jon Lyus
90*

The review is strongly positive about Fantasia 2000 as a worthy follow-up to the original. It particularly praises the film’s new animated sections and musical selections.

Read the full review →
Collider
22 December 2010 · Andre Dellamorte
70*

The critic finds Fantasia 2000 a successful update and an amazing document, though neither film fully works as a movie. He praises the animation’s craft, especially its graceful cel-animation details amid the shift to CGI.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
19 January 2001 · Angus Wolfe Murray
20*

The critic gives the film a strongly negative verdict, finding its sentimentality and self-congratulating introductions overbearing. The animated shorts are praised for their artistic skill, particularly the adaptation of The Steadfast Tin Soldier.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate