Critics’ reviews

Fast Five (2011)

17 reviews from 17 publications. Critics’ score 69: 12 positive, 3 mixed, 2 negative.

Back to our review of Fast Five

69
Positive
12
Mixed
3
Negative
2

Most critics enjoy it, and several call it the best film in the series so far. The praise gathers around the set pieces: the vault dragged through the streets of Rio, the train hijacking, the rooftop footrace. Justin Lin’s staging and pacing are credited with turning the absurdity into a virtue, and Dwayne Johnson’s arrival is welcomed as a good fit for the franchise, his clashes with Vin Diesel singled out more than once.

The reservations are consistent even among admirers: the film is too long, the finale especially, and the plot and dialogue are thin. The spread is fairly wide. The Guardian finds it predictable and overindulgent, with stunts that seem to go on for ever, and Slant Magazine calls it a generic heist picture that has abandoned what made the series distinctive. The AV Club, though positive, is uneasy about how cheerfully the film flattens Rio’s poorest neighbourhoods.

Variety
21 April 2011 · Robert Koehler
85*

Koehler calls it the best entry in the series so far and says its blend of familiar elements and novelty should delight audiences. He especially praises the breakneck pacing and the elaborate Rio heist and chase sequences.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
28 April 2011 · B+ · Scott Tobias
83

Tobias finds the film a streamlined, hugely satisfying action sequel that turns its absurdity into an asset. He praises the well-orchestrated setpieces, while noting its troubling destruction of Rio’s poor favelas.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★★ · Alan Jones
80

Jones finds the film enormously enjoyable, praising its high-velocity action and returning cast. He says Justin Lin’s picturesque swooping shots are the only blot.

Read the full review →
Empire
14 January 2011 · Nick de Semlyen
75*

The critic finds it the series’ most entertaining entry despite its clunky scenes and excessive length. Dwayne Johnson’s larger-than-life presence and the extravagantly destructive final chase stand out for praise.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
28 April 2011 · ★★★ · Roger Ebert
75

Ebert gives the film a positive verdict, finding it an effective action spectacle. He singles out the ensemble’s chemistry and the heist’s entertaining scale.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
28 April 2011 · Manohla Dargis
75*

Dargis’s verdict is broadly positive, presenting the film as an especially entertaining entry in the series. She singles out its energetic action spectacle as a key strength.

Read the full review →
Film Comment
· Scott Foundas
70*

Foundas suggests the fifth installment is a success for fans of lowbrow vehicular mayhem. The standfirst singles out its appeal to lovers of that kind of action.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
29 April 2011 · Betsy Sharkey
70*

Sharkey finds the film an audacious, entertaining action spectacle, calling it the best entry in the series so far. She praises the rooftop footrace and Diesel–Johnson clashes, but says the long finale and overall runtime should have been cut down.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
19 April 2011 · Megan Lehmann
70*

Lehmann finds the film a gleefully silly, durable action spectacle that restores goodwill toward the franchise. She praises its metal-crunching set pieces, especially the vault careening through Rio, while noting the weak acting and thin plot.

Read the full review →
Vulture
19 August 2018 · Margaret Lyons
65*

The critic gives the film a qualified yes, while questioning whether the franchise deserves its progressive reputation. They single out its abundance of hugging and mugging, alongside its approach to race.

Read the full review →
Time Out
19 April 2011 · ★★★ · Anna Smith
60

The three-star rating suggests a mixed-to-positive verdict, while the review notes the franchise’s surprising longevity. The available text does not reveal what else the critic singles out for praise or complaint.

Read the full review →
Total Film
19 April 2011 · ★★★ · James Mottram
60

Mottram finds it an entertaining, full-throttle action film that understands its audience, though it is no mould-breaker. He singles out the train hijacking as the standout sequence and praises Dwayne Johnson’s fit with the franchise.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
24 April 2011 · Philip French
40*

French finds the film predictable and overindulgent, despite its spectacular action. He singles out the elaborate car theft and safe-dragging stunts, which he says seem to go on for ever.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
26 April 2011 · ★½/4 · Nick Schager
38

The critic finds the film a dim-witted, generic heist story that abandons the franchise’s distinctive focus. He praises the momentum and brawn of the opening sequence and finale, but complains that the rest is weighed down by a shopworn plot and stock elements.

Read the full review →
Den of Geek
18 April 2011 · ★★★★ · Ryan Lambie
80

Lambie finds the film an absurd but hugely entertaining, high-octane action movie. He praises its technical craft and spectacular set pieces, while criticizing the weak writing and slow stretches between them.

Read the full review →
The Playlist
27 April 2011 · B · The Playlist Staff
77

The review finds the film entertaining despite its excessive length, violence, and diminished car-culture appeal. It praises Lin’s staging and pacing, especially in the climactic vault-dragging chase.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
20 April 2011 · Jennie Kermode
75*

Kermode finds the film an enjoyable, energetic success despite its excessive length and formulaic plot. She particularly praises the inventive, destructive car-action set pieces and their pacing.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate