Critics’ reviews

Fatal Attraction (1987)

11 reviews from 11 publications. Critics’ score 64: 7 positive, 2 mixed, 2 negative.

Back to our review of Fatal Attraction

64
Positive
7
Mixed
2
Negative
2

Most critics come down in favour, though the praise is of a particular kind: this is a glossy studio thriller, and the reviews that like it admire it for being exactly that. Glenn Close is the one point of near-total agreement, singled out in review after review as the reason the film holds together. Adrian Lyne is credited with milking the tension and giving the affair a seductive, tactile surface, and Michael Douglas gets steady if less excited notice.

The reservations gather around the script and the ending. Several critics find the screenplay shallow and predictable, and a recurring complaint is that the ending was reshot after test screenings and pushes the film towards slasher territory. The spread is wide. The New Yorker and Time Out both object to what the film says about women, reading it as hostile to feminism or flattering to those who dislike them, while The Ringer argues it endures because of those flaws rather than despite them.

Empire
1 January 2000 · Angie Errigo
90*

Adrian Lyne's slick thriller is praised as a gripping, suspenseful hit driven by two riveting performances, with Glenn Close's unhinged portrayal singled out as spectacular. The reversal of the typical stalker dynamic leaves a nasty but unforgettable impression.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★★ · John Ferguson
80

The critic notes it helped create the 'crazed female from hell' genre, praises Glenn Close's excellent performance and Adrian Lyne's skill at milking tension and slick power, while acknowledging the dubious message about affairs.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
20 February 2017 · Alex McLevy
75*

The critic calls Fatal Attraction a glossy but pulpy studio thriller that became a cultural phenomenon and Oscar nominee despite its trashy story of an affair gone wrong. They single out its effective dread, strong performances, and honest embrace of its sensationalism over deeper ambiguity.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
18 September 1987 · Michael Wilmington
70*

The movie is an exciting New York thriller built on the idea that casual sex without bonds can lead to psychopathology, with tight direction and strong performances that keep viewers gripped for most of its runtime. The botched climax turns it toward slasher territory and undermines its potential complexity.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
18 September 1987 · Janet Maslin
70*

The film is a thoroughly conventional thriller elevated by director Adrian Lyne's slick, seductive style and visual imagery that makes every element tactile and rich. Michael Douglas and Glenn Close deliver strong performances in a manipulative soap opera of exceptional power.

Read the full review →
The Independent
21 October 1992 · John Lyttle
55*

The critic examines the video re-release featuring the original darker ending, in which the protagonist is framed for murder after the mistress's suicide, and contrasts it favorably with the theatrical happy ending. Hollywood's preference for feel-good resolutions is critiqued as undermining the story's moral ambiguity.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
14 April 2002 · Ed Gonzalez
50*

The critic finds the film notable mainly for Glenn Close’s resilient and complex performance as Alex, which gives physical form to inner torment. They single out Adrian Lyne’s visual style and use of layers and lighting for praise, while complaining that the screenplay is shallow and the reshot ending undermines the original intent.

Read the full review →
Time Out
10 September 2012 · NF
40*

The critic describes it as a glossy but clichéd Hitchcock-by-numbers thriller whose overheated visual style clashes with a tepid script, ultimately a predictable collection of thriller tropes that will appeal to those holding misogynistic views.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
12 October 1987 · Pauline Kael
30*

The picture is a skillfully made cautionary tale about the perils of casual sex and adultery, but it offers a hostile version of feminism through its portrayal of the obsessed woman. Glenn Close plays the character as pitiable and biologically driven in bravura demonstrations of passion directed by Adrian Lyne.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
30 August 2009 · Jennie Kermode
75*

The critic praises the film's core chemistry and ambiguity, which raises questions about whose side the audience should take, along with strong casting that makes the central performances convincing and intense. She notes that test-audience changes to the ending shifted it toward more conventional thriller territory but still finds much to appreciate in its intelligent story, passion, scares and character work.

Read the full review →
The Ringer
28 April 2023 · Adam Nayman
75*

The critic views the film as a cultural phenomenon and enduring classic precisely because of its flaws, including its strategically finessed misogyny and crowd-pleasing ending changes, rather than in spite of them. They single out Glenn Close's performance and the film's glossy, prestige-packaged erotic thriller style for praise while critiquing its conservative, button-pushing approach to gender dynamics.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate