Critics’ reviews

Finding Nemo (2003)

11 reviews from 11 publications. We need six from publications we count before we show a critics’ score; there are 2 so far.

Back to our review of Finding Nemo

2 of 6
Positive
2
Mixed
0
Negative
0
Evening Standard
· Neil Norman
85*

The critic calls it Pixar's finest work so far, a classic tale with genuine emotional depth, terrifically funny script and breathtaking animation. The characters, psychological insight and technical skill are singled out for praise.

Read the full review →
Empire
· Angie Errigo
80*

The critic finds the film beautifully composed and consistently charming, with a perfectly family-oriented mix of adventure, humour and life lessons. The animation, voice cast and underwater world are singled out for praise as terrific-looking and sweet.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
30 May 2003 · Kenneth Turan

Pixar solidifies its status as Hollywood's most reliable creative force with this engaging undersea story of a fish family learning life lessons. Turan singles out the rapturous visuals of the Great Barrier Reef and the eccentric, culturally skewering sea creatures like the sharks in recovery.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
30 May 2003 · Roger Ebert

The film delivers the usual Pixar pleasures of comedy and wackiness while adding striking visual beauty in its underwater world of color and movement. Ebert praises the inventive story, memorable voice performances, and how it appeals to both children and adults.

Read the full review →
Screen Daily
30 May 2003

Maintains Pixar's exceptionally high standard with deliriously inventive storytelling and warm wit, setting a high artistic benchmark. Highlights its visually striking CGI underwater design while ensuring characterisation comes first, remaining endearing without cloying.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
18 May 2003

The review describes the film as transplanting suburban parental anxiety to an underwater setting in an adorable but less inventive way than prior Pixar efforts. It notes the simple lesson about trusting children to make mistakes and says it should resonate with overprotective parents.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
27 May 2003 · Keith Phipps

The review praises Pixar's high standard of storytelling that blends humor and emotional depth, noting the impressive visuals underwater while grounding the tale in familiar heartbreak and happiness. It highlights the opening scene's impact and the voice performances bringing heart to the characters.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
3 October 2003

The critic praises the film as outstanding quality family entertainment from Pixar, with dazzling CGI, witty characters and superb direction. They single out the hyperreal underwater world and the voices, especially Albert Brooks and Ellen DeGeneres, while noting it feels slightly less ambitious than prior Pixar films.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
27 May 2003 · Sheri Linden

The review calls it an exhilarating fish story with a fluid narrative and visual nuance that feels less mechanical than prior Pixar films. It singles out the chemistry between Albert Brooks and Ellen DeGeneres along with the meticulous sound design and Thomas Newman score for praise.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
30 May 2003 · NYT Critic’s Pick · Stephen Holden

The review calls the film an upbeat, sentimental fable about a fearful father and rebellious son, highlighting its sparkling aquatic animation and comically inspired characters like the great white shark Bruce. It praises the witty script and the way it balances adventure with family themes.

Read the full review →
Time Out
23 January 2013 · Tom Huddleston

Praises the film for proving how far audiences would trust Pixar's output without familiar elements or big stars, becoming a banner title with thrilling big scenes. Notes it is not quite as note-perfect as later work, with a grating lead voice and soppy ending.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate