
Most critics respond warmly to First Man’s sober, intimate account of Armstrong and the space race. Praise centres on the claustrophobic flight sequences, with sound, cinematography and editing making the machinery feel precarious and the danger immediate. Gosling’s restraint and Foy’s portrayal of shared grief draw frequent approval. The reviews also welcome Chazelle’s attention to personal sacrifice and his avoidance of patriotic self-congratulation.
Reservations concern the emotional distance of the central character, slow stretches between missions and supporting relationships that receive too little attention. The spread is wide despite the strongly positive majority: some critics find the grief moving, while others think the film presses it too insistently. The New York Times finds Armstrong’s inner life elusive despite the strong performances; The New Yorker goes further, arguing that the emphasis on repression and sentimentality misrepresents his modesty. Even these dissenters acknowledge the convincing depiction of technical detail or danger.
E
Empire
11 September 2018 · John Nugent
90*
The film is a serious, dour study of obsession and ambition that marks a giant leap in Chazelle's cinematic scope. It succeeds through immersive craft, visceral sequences and intimate focus on Armstrong's personal sacrifices, with Gosling and Foy excelling.
Read the full review →S
Sight and Sound
29 August 2018 · festival review · John Bleasdale
90*
The critic praises Chazelle’s elegant, intimate approach that makes the familiar Moon landing story feel fresh, highlighting Gosling’s mature performance as Armstrong and the film’s focus on personal grief alongside technical peril.
Read the full review →H
The Hollywood Reporter
29 August 2018 · festival review · David Rooney
90*
Praises the sober, contemplative picture for its emotional involvement, visceral tension, suspense, and stunning technical craft. Singles out the film's refusal to engage in expected jingoistic self-celebration.
Read the full review →T
The Times
12 October 2018 · ★★★★☆ · Kevin Maher
90*
The critic calls it a full-bodied space weepie that reconstitutes Armstrong as a man riven with grief, delivering a visually exquisite period drama with an emotional payoff. They single out the ending's image of parental grief as a perfect apotheosis.
Read the full review →V
Vulture
12 October 2018 · festival review · David Edelstein
85*
Describes it as laborious yet stupendous, the most grounded space movie ever made. Singles out the intimate focus on family tensions and the exultant silence of the lunar landing.
Read the full review →I
IndieWire
29 August 2018 · B+ · Michael Nordine
83
Calls it a thrilling Neil Armstrong biopic that meets sky-high expectations. Highlights the right stuff in Chazelle and Gosling's collaboration.
Read the full review →R
Radio Times
8 October 2018 · ★★★★ · Terry Staunton
80
Gosling and Foy deliver magnificent performances in Chazelle’s elegantly drawn, intimate portrait that humanizes Armstrong’s motivations and the couple’s shared grief while balancing personal drama with tense space sequences.
Read the full review →T
Time Out
11 September 2018 · ★★★★ · Joshua Rothkopf
80
Chazelle transforms the lunar landing into breathtaking visual poetry through Armstrong’s stoic reserve and internalized grief, creating a provocative statement about pursuing excellence and big dreams rather than flag-waving spectacle.
Read the full review →T
Total Film
10 September 2018
80*
Chazelle delivers a buttoned-down but authentic account of the space race and Armstrong's story. The blend of kitchen-sink drama and science fact is ambitious and artful, leaving viewers in awe despite its sombre tone.
Read the full review →A
The AV Club
19 October 2018 · B · A.A. Dowd
77
Notes the film's ambivalence toward American ambition and the space program, praising its portrayal of determination alongside the human costs. Singles out the chilling scene where Armstrong prepares his children for possible death.
Read the full review →S
Slant Magazine
2 September 2018 · ★★★/4 · Paul O'Callaghan
75
Praises the tactile action set pieces that highlight the perils of the space race and the un-jingoistic appraisal. Complains about the script's over-fixation on the death of Armstrong's daughter.
Read the full review →E
Evening Standard
12 October 2018 · Matthew Norman
70*
The film is deliberately gruelling and claustrophobic, succeeding brilliantly at conveying the visceral experience of space flight but struggling to engage the heart. It commands admiration more than love through its technical achievements and focus on Armstrong's reserve.
Read the full review →L
Los Angeles Times
9 October 2018 · Justin Chang
70*
The lunar landing sequence is a sublime, technically masterful highlight that evokes awe through visuals and sound design. The film is an idiosyncratic, viscerally intense portrait that thrills and moves through its focus on rupture, sacrifice, and one man's quiet reckoning, though it sometimes over-insists on emotional undercurrents.
Read the full review →S
Screen Daily
29 August 2018 · festival review
70*
A beautifully made film with an impeccable lead performance from Gosling, though it takes elegant flight but stalls in its extended closing sequences and neglects fuller development of supporting characters.
Read the full review →G
The Guardian
14 October 2018 · Mark Kermode
70*
The critic describes the film as a sombre, low-key study of grief that turns the space adventure into a moving tale of loss and peril. They single out the empathetic performance by Claire Foy and the technical choices that evoke claustrophobia and isolation.
Read the full review →N
The New Yorker
5 October 2018 · Anthony Lane
30*
The film captures the otherness and risks of the Apollo missions effectively but fails to convey Neil Armstrong's Midwestern modesty, instead imposing modern emotional repression and sentimentality on him. Gosling's casting and the emphasis on personal grief undermine the historical authenticity of the stoic hero.
Read the full review →N
The New York Times
10 October 2018 · A.O. Scott
30*
The critic finds the film a careful, earthbound character study that gets technical details right but falls short of deeper grandeur or meaning. It portrays Armstrong as an enigmatic, diffident figure whose inner life remains elusive despite strong performances.
Read the full review →H
HeyUGuys
27 September 2018 · ★★★★★ · Linda Marric
100
The critic praises Chazelle's immersive character study of Neil Armstrong's quiet determination amid personal tragedy and the space race, highlighting Gosling and Foy's performances along with Sandgren's evocative cinematography.
Read the full review →D
Deadline
8 October 2018 · Pete Hammond
85*
The critic praises Chazelle's versatile direction in tackling the story of Neil Armstrong and the Apollo 11 mission. Gosling delivers a restrained, authentic performance that brings emotional depth to the otherwise sober film, supported by strong technical credits.
Read the full review →E
Eye for Film
24 October 2018 · Andrew Robertson
85*
The review emphasizes the film's focus on grief, loneliness, and technical precision in depicting spaceflight, commending the direction, sound design, editing, and performances by Gosling and Foy as a compelling portrait beyond mere rockets.
Read the full review →R
The Ringer
11 October 2018 · Sean Fennessey
85*
The review highlights the film's technical magnificence and quiet, restrained approach to portraying Neil Armstrong's stoic dedication, contrasting it with more bombastic space films.
Read the full review →P
The Playlist
29 August 2018 · B+ · Jessica Kiang
83
The critic lauds the film's immaculate craftsmanship, immersive recreation of the Apollo mission, and Chazelle's command of technique as a grand, classic epic that becomes the definitive moon-landing movie despite its reserved central figure.
Read the full review →D
Den of Geek
25 September 2018 · ★★★★ · Simon Reynolds
80
The critic finds it a gripping account of the moon landing that emphasizes the brutal endurance test of space travel and the personal costs, praising the intense practical effects and performances especially Claire Foy, but notes the central character remains enigmatic.
Read the full review →P
Polygon
11 October 2018 · Matt Patches
80*
The film is an immersive, nerve-wracking simulation of spaceflight that excels in its technical and visceral depiction of missions but falters in its handling of the protagonist's personal relationships.
Read the full review →W
The Wrap
10 October 2018 · festival review · Alonso Duralde
80*
The critic calls the film a haunting, thrilling space saga that reminds viewers of the risks and chaos involved in the moon landing. It stands out for its intimate portrait of Armstrong, visceral depiction of space travel, and impressive technical achievements.
Read the full review →C
Collider
12 October 2018 · B · Matt Goldberg
77
The critic praises the film's immersive portrayal of the dangers and details of space missions but criticizes the distant portrayal of Neil Armstrong himself.
Read the full review →/
/Film
10 September 2018 · 7/10 · Chris Evangelista
70
The review notes strong performances and stunning moon-landing sequences but finds the old-fashioned drama often inert and slow between set pieces, making it a mixed but worthwhile watch.
Read the full review →Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate