Critics’ reviews

For Your Eyes Only (1981)

7 reviews from 7 publications. Critics’ score 56: 2 positive, 3 mixed, 2 negative.

Back to our review of For Your Eyes Only

56
Positive
2
Mixed
3
Negative
2

Most critics agree on what For Your Eyes Only is trying to do: after the excesses of Moonraker, it strips the gadgets back and aims for a leaner, more grounded Bond adventure. The reviews are split on whether that works, but the praise clusters consistently. John Glen’s direction is credited with keeping the action tidy, Carole Bouquet is noted as an appealing, classy heroine, and Topol’s turn as the rogue Columbo is singled out more than once as the film’s most colourful presence.

The spread is wide. Variety calls it among the most enjoyable entries in the series, while Time Out finds it flat and undercooked despite the sterner approach. The reservations cluster on Roger Moore, whose drollery several critics feel sits awkwardly with the more serious tone, and on a plot that offers few surprises; Roger Ebert finds the central relationship routine and short on chemistry. The contemporary reviews are the warmest, and the later retrospective assessments the coldest.

Variety
31 December 1980 · Variety Staff
80*

It emerges as one of the most thoroughly enjoyable Bond films to date, even without many of the usual franchise ingredients. The direction by John Glen stands out as among the best in the series since On Her Majesty's Secret Service, aided by a sympathetic heroine.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
26 June 1981 · Vincent Canby
70*

It is far from the best Bond film but also far from the worst, with a strong opening sequence that the rest of the movie struggles to match. It offers slick entertainment with an appealing lead actress in Carole Bouquet.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★ · John Ferguson
60

This 12th entry in the 007 series provides no real surprises, with the exception perhaps of Roger Moore, who gets the chance to show a little more grit than usual. The plot revolves around the hunt for a device from a sunken spy ship, with French star (and Chanel model) Carole Bouquet providing class as the girl who may hold the key to the puzzle. If Julian Glover is rather subdued as the number one villain, there's a colourful turn from Fiddler on the Roof star Topol as a rogue with shifting loyalties, and the eagle-eyed will spot Charles Dance as a killer. Bond veteran John Glen ensures that

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
1 January 1981 · Roger Ebert
50*

The film is a competent but unremarkable James Bond entry that lacks surprises or standout elements compared to earlier films in the series. The relationship between Bond and the lead actress lacks chemistry and feels routine.

Read the full review →
Empire
27 April 2006 · Ian Nathan
40*

The film attempts a leaner, more realistic Bond adventure after the excesses of Moonraker but remains one of the most forgettable entries, hampered by Roger Moore's unsuitable droll performance and an awkward mix of tones.

Read the full review →
Time Out
3 October 2012
30*

This is Roger Moore playing serious Bond, with a minimum of gadgetry and effects; it’s a sunken soufflé, unfortunately. Sheena Easton’s much-maligned title number has stood the test of time, though.

Read the full review →
Den of Geek
24 June 2016 · Max Williams
60*

The film is an outlier in the Moore era, a low-key and more realistic outing that grounds the franchise after Moonraker but never quite takes off as a full reinvention. The critic singles out the strong characterisation and performance of ally Columbo for praise amid otherwise mixed elements.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate