Critics’ reviews

Foreign Correspondent (1940)

10 reviews from 10 publications. Critics’ score 74: 9 positive, 1 mixed, 0 negative.

Back to our review of Foreign Correspondent

74
Positive
9
Mixed
1
Negative
0

Most critics enjoy Foreign Correspondent as a brisk espionage thriller and one of Hitchcock’s more assured early Hollywood films. The praise gathers around the set pieces: nearly every review names the Dutch windmill sequence, and the rain-soaked assassination under a sea of umbrellas and the effects-heavy plane crash also draw notice. Several see it as a rehearsal for the chase thrillers he made later, and the cast is consistently approved, with Joel McCrea’s mix of confidence and naivety and George Sanders, Edmund Gwenn and Herbert Marshall in support singled out.

The reservations cluster at the ending. The patriotic finale strikes more than one critic as florid, and Time Out finds it embarrassing today and misses the cruelty and pessimism of Hitchcock’s other work. The spread is narrow, running from warm to enthusiastic, with the Los Angeles Times the lone mixed voice, calling it good rather than great and complaining of too much talk about patriotism.

The AV Club
19 February 2014 · A- · Ben Kenigsberg
90

The critic finds the film spectacularly entertaining as a prime example of Hitchcock's breakneck travelogue thrillers and a dry run for later classics like North by Northwest. The rain-soaked assassination scene with the sea of umbrellas and other set pieces like the windmill and plane crash are highlighted as standout moments.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
31 August 1940
90*

The incidents are extraordinarily exciting and up-to-the-minute, dramatizing current news events as a perfect thriller with Fifth Columnists, assassinations, kidnappings, and a tremendous finale aboard a plane on the day war is declared. Hitchcock's unfailing contribution is the smooth piecing together of these elements.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
20 February 2014 · Jordan Cronk
80*

The critic views the film as a key early Hollywood work that foreshadows Hitchcock's later style and scale through its ambitious production and memorable set pieces. The windmill chase, rooftop escape, and plane crash sequence are singled out as impressive examples of cinematic spectacle.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
27 August 2012
75*

The critic describes the film as a breathless yarn with serious intent that soars well beyond mediocrity but just below genius, and argues it deserves a place among Hitchcock's best. They single out its humour and brilliance in staging, along with its clear propagandistic purpose to inspire American audiences about events in Europe.

Read the full review →
Empire
28 April 2006 · Kim Newman
70*

The critic calls it highly-wrought entertainment in the vein of Hitchcock's other thrillers, with the hero getting into scrapes across London and Holland. They single out the windmill sequence, Edmund Gwenn's creepy cameo, and the effects-laden plane crash climax for praise.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
28 August 1940 · Bosley Crowther
70*

The critic finds the film packed with romantic action, melodramatic hullabaloo, comical diversion, and an illusion of momentous consequence. It is high-geared entertainment for those who can take sensationalism without skepticism, with uniformly good cast and excellent photographic sequences like the Dutch windmill.

Read the full review →
Time Out
22 September 2014 · GA
70*

Hitchcock's espionage thriller is a thoroughly enjoyable affair with memorable set pieces, even if the propagandistic finale feels embarrassing today and it lacks the director's usual cruelty or moral pessimism. McCrea and Day search out Nazi agents in London and Holland, with fine support from Sanders, Gwenn and Marshall.

Read the full review →
Variety
31 December 1939 · Variety Staff
70*

The story is essentially cops-and-robbers set against international political intrigue with a war flavor, though not a war picture, featuring mystery and intrigue. The cast is carefully selected and tops, with Joel McCrea blending self-confidence and naivete as the reporter-hero and strong support from the ensemble.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
31 January 1992 · Mark Chalon Smith
50*

It is a good movie but not great, part thriller and part propaganda with too much blabbing about patriotism at the florid ending. Several juicy Hitchcock set pieces stand out, including the striking windmill sequence involving the apparent murder of a Dutch diplomat.

Read the full review →
Collider
19 January 2026 · Luc Haasbroek
80*

The critic calls it a fast-moving political thriller that showcases Hitchcock's growing mastery of scale and momentum. It balances entertainment with a warning about the stakes of war and misinformation, earning notice even from Joseph Goebbels as effective propaganda.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate