Critics’ reviews

Gallipoli (1981)

8 reviews from 8 publications. We need six from publications we count before we show a critics’ score; there are 5 so far.

Back to our review of Gallipoli

5 of 6
Positive
4
Mixed
1
Negative
0

With only 5 reviews in so far, most critics praise Peter Weir’s moving account of young Australians going to war, particularly the friendship between its leads. The contrast between the sunlit opening and the trenches draws praise, as does the film’s treatment of comradeship and sacrifice. Reservations concern its historical perspective and pacing: The Telegraph objects to an anti-British bias in the portrayal of command decisions, while Time Out finds the Egypt training section sluggish and its humour crude. The latter is notably cooler than the other reviews, despite admiring the battle photography.

The AV Club
19 January 2006 · A · Scott Tobias
95

The film follows young Australian soldiers from enlistment through training to the trenches, where their initial sense of adventure gives way to inevitable slaughter. Weir honors the patriotic sacrifice while underscoring the futility, with the unforgettable final freeze-frame singled out as especially powerful.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · Ian Nathan
90*

The critic calls it a haunting and moving tribute to the Australians who sacrificed their lives at Gallipoli, presenting the tragic loss of innocence in a more affecting way than similar films. Weir is praised for portraying the strange calling of war as an intimate elegy through the comradeship and bond between the two leads, contrasted with the Outback and trenches.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★★ · David Parkinson
80

This landmark Australian film focuses on the spirit of competition and camaraderie rather than overt pacifism or Anzac pride. Weir effectively contrasts the trenches' chaos with the sunlit opening scenes while centering on the responses of the two young leads.

Read the full review →
The Telegraph
25 April 2016
70*

The review calls the film heartbreaking and haunting, praising its depiction of young athletes turned soldiers and the tragic climax at the Nek. It complains about historical inaccuracies, particularly an anti-British bias in the portrayal of command decisions.

Read the full review →
Time Out
10 September 2012 · TM
60*

The film is Australia's answer to Chariots of Fire, buoyed by nationalistic fervour as two sprinters head to the WWI battlefront. The Gallipoli battle reconstructions are handsomely shot and convey the waste of war, but the Egypt training section drags with crass buddy antics and crude caricatures.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
22 January 2009 · A–

The critic praises Peter Weir's 1981 film as a magisterial portrait of the Gallipoli campaign and its historical settings. It singles out the moving climax at the Battle of the Nek for its emotional impact while noting some minor historical liberties.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
28 August 1981 · Janet Maslin

The film follows young Australian runners into the catastrophic WWI battle at Gallipoli, approaching war obliquely through its beauty and emotional power rather than as a conventional war movie. Weir's delicate style yields uncommon warmth, immediacy and striking images, such as the underwater shot of soldiers in reddening water.

Read the full review →
Variety
31 December 1980 · Variety Staff

Weir has fashioned an intimate epic that focuses closely on the relationship between two young Australian runners and how it is affected by events on the Gallipoli battlefield. The film tackles a central Australian legend in human terms and emerges as a highly entertaining drama accessible to all.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate