Critics’ reviews

Gaslight (1944)

9 reviews from 9 publications. Critics’ score 73: 8 positive, 0 mixed, 1 negative.

Back to our review of Gaslight

73
Positive
8
Mixed
0
Negative
1
Los Angeles Times
10 February 1994 · Jon Matsumoto
90*

Boyer delivers one of his most memorable performances as the ruthless husband trying to drive his wife insane in this 1944 psychological mystery-drama; the film maintains a tantalizing aura of mystery around his motives. It is buttressed by strong supporting turns, including Angela Lansbury as the impudent maid and Joseph Cotten as the determined detective.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
4 May 2017 · THR Staff
90*

The review highlights the strong performances by Ingrid Bergman, Charles Boyer, and Joseph Cotten in this psychological thriller, praising the film's suspenseful characterizations and George Cukor's skillful direction.

Read the full review →
Little White Lies
4 August 2016 · Stephen Puddicombe
80*

Praises the film as the first major Hollywood picture to depict an abusive relationship. Highlights its realistic and grounded portrayal of emotional abuse through subtle manipulation, strong performances by Boyer and Bergman, and psychological realism.

Read the full review →
Sight and Sound
29 July 2021 · Pamela Hutchinson
75*

Describes the film as the epitome of the paranoid melodrama and a period film noir. Praises Bergman's performance of naive vulnerability and the enjoyable final-act revenge scene, noting its vivid depiction of domestic emotional abuse.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
4 May 2024 · Drew Gillis
70*

The piece positions the film as a bridge between classic melodrama and modern themes, examining its depiction of psychological manipulation and the origins of the term 'gaslighting' through the abusive husband-wife dynamic.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
6 May 1944 · David Lardner
70*

Gaslight is a natural story that will scare viewers even if they know the plot from the play; the principals are a shade too mannered but still effective overall, providing a good way to spend a horrified evening. The film adds some early happy scenes in Italy that serve little dramatic purpose but offer relief from the spooky house.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
5 May 1944
70*

The film is a dark study of Victorian villainy adapted from the play Angel Street, with Ingrid Bergman and Charles Boyer delivering strong performances as the distraught wife and her wicked spouse. Director George Cukor gives a pungent production, though the film loses some of the play's fearful immediacy due to the camera's flexibility.

Read the full review →
Variety
31 December 1943 · Variety Staff
70*

The faithful adaptation of Patrick Hamilton’s stage melodrama receives an exciting screen treatment with fine star performances and a solid screenplay; Cukor keeps an even pace that heightens dramatic suspense. The film lacks some of the stage play’s theatrical element but benefits from strong production values.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
11 February 2004 · Eric Henderson
40*

The critic notes Bergman's Oscar-winning suffering and Cukor's expert pacing but finds the melodrama overly genteel and lacking in psychological subtlety or lasting impact compared to edgier thrillers.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate