Critics’ reviews

Ghost World (2001)

11 reviews from 11 publications. We need six from publications we count before we show a critics’ score; there are 3 so far.

Back to our review of Ghost World

3 of 6
Positive
3
Mixed
0
Negative
0
The Guardian
13 August 2001 · Peter Bradshaw
85*

Peter Bradshaw calls it one of the funniest, most lugubrious and saddest films of the year. He singles out the odd, touching love affair between Enid and the older man Seymour, played by Steve Buscemi, for particular praise.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · Angie Errigo
80*

The critic finds the film a sophisticated and original take on teen angst, praising its sharp humour, subtle observations of consumerism and characters, and strong performances, though noting it's more admirable than immediately appealing.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
20 July 2001 · Kevin Thomas

The critic calls the film a singularly unsettling portrait of a culture in the grip of the mediocre and a disquieting consciousness-raiser about a rapidly disintegrating world. He singles out the way it digs beneath the surface of suburban America to show Enid's acute sense of all that is wrong.

Read the full review →
Screen Daily
23 July 2001 · festival review

Zwigoff makes a rough transition into feature filmmaking with this bland, deliberately paced writer's picture that will likely see only mediocre art-house business. It is well-acted with strong performances from Birch and Johansson but suffers from lack of energy and flat direction.

Read the full review →
Sight and Sound
1 December 2001 · Leslie Felperin

Viewers will delight in the film's deadpan wit, softly layered details and deft portrait of suburban anomie. It adeptly evokes the unbearable dullness of being 18 and the precarious power play of female friendship, though the ending feels pat.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
17 July 2001 · Ed Gonzalez

The critic praises the successful adaptation of the graphic novel, noting how it captures adolescent loneliness and the transition to adulthood through Enid and Rebecca's cynical worldview. The open-ended finale is singled out for evoking uncertainty and the ghostly nature of memory and loss.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
29 March 2002 · Scott Tobias

The review highlights the film's success in adapting the comic's episodic rhythms and finding poignancy in outcasts' sarcasm and misanthropy. It singles out the subtle unraveling of the central friendship and the authentic portrayal of alienation amid suburban banality.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
30 July 2001

The review finds the film a satisfying dyspeptic comedy that captures the girls' surly worldview and the integrity of the outsider characters. It singles out the visually elegant yet poetically depressed urban landscape and the double-edged irony of the live-action cartoon style.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
20 July 2001 · A. O. Scott

The critic praises the film as the best depiction of teenage eccentricity since Rushmore and a sharp satire of boredom and conformity. He singles out the adaptation's tighter narrative and the cast's vivid portrayal of loneliness and disaffection.

Read the full review →
Time Out
3 May 2011 · TCh

The film relishes adolescent rebellion but subjects the heroines' knee-jerk cynicism to the mundane complexities of human relationships. This sort-of love story is beautifully played and never less than strikingly original.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
10 August 2001 · festival review · Angus Wolfe Murray
80*

The critic praises the film's focus on Enid's anarchic spirit and alienation amid American urban decay, noting how it strips away illusions about loneliness and friendship. Buscemi delivers one of his finest performances as the misfit Seymour, and Thora Birch reinforces her promise as Enid.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate