Critics’ reviews

Gimme Shelter (1970)

8 reviews from 8 publications. Critics’ score 64: 5 positive, 1 mixed, 2 negative.

Back to our review of Gimme Shelter

64
Positive
5
Mixed
1
Negative
2

Most critics come down in favour of Gimme Shelter, though not by a wide margin. The praise gathers around the Maysles brothers and Zwerin’s construction: the film moves from tour footage towards the Altamont concert with a dread several reviewers find hard to shake, and it does so without commentary or talking heads. Jagger’s performances are singled out again and again, mesmerising on stage and withdrawn off it, and more than one critic ranks the film among the best rock documentaries made.

The reservations are about ethics rather than craft. Pauline Kael in The New Yorker argues the film shapes events to let the Stones and the filmmakers off the hook while trading on the violence, and Time Out faults it for staring at Jagger and never asking what the musicians owed the crowd. The New York Times finds it skilfully shot and edited but bleak to the point of being unwatchable. The spread is wide, from outright dismissal to landmark.

Film Comment
1 May 2015
90*

The critic hails Gimme Shelter as the Maysles brothers and Zwerin's greatest film, centering on the Rolling Stones' catastrophic 1969 Altamont concert. It praises the film's clear construction, the way it forces the Stones to confront their image, and its status as a landmark of nonfiction cinema.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
6 September 2009
80*

The critic highlights how the restored documentary captures the dread surrounding the Altamont concert and the Rolling Stones' music-making, while underscoring the limits of the era's peace-and-love ideals.

Read the full review →
Variety
31 December 1969 · ** · Variety Staff
70*

The film offers a riveting close-up of the Stones in performance, with Jagger emerging offstage as withdrawn and onstage as mesmerizing and petulant. It builds to the violent Altamont finale captured in the documentary.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
12 December 1970 · Pauline Kael
50*

The review questions the ethics and structure of the cinéma-vérité approach, noting how the film shapes events to whitewash the Stones and filmmakers while exploiting the Altamont violence and Jagger's performances. It highlights the disturbing pathos and the complications of filming events staged for the camera.

Read the full review →
Time Out
3 May 2011 · GA
40*

The critic finds the film a bummer, criticizing its near-constant focus on Mick Jagger and its failure to probe the musicians' responsibility for the Altamont murder. It nonetheless serves as a reminder that the 1960s were not solely about peace and love.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
13 December 1970
30*

The film is described as one of the most unpleasant, bleak, and depressing movies encountered, despite skilled photography and editing of the Altamont events and Stones tour. It questions the profit motives and quasi-factual presentation of the disaster.

Read the full review →
NME
30 April 2013 · Jeremy Allen
90*

The post calls Gimme Shelter one of the greatest rock documentaries ever made for capturing the Stones' Altamont concert and the murder that occurred there without commentary or talking heads. It contrasts its raw, committed approach with more polished later music docs.

Read the full review →
The Skinny
17 February 2015 · festival review · Lewis Porteous
70*

The piece describes Gimme Shelter as a documentary heavy on concert footage of the Rolling Stones leading to the disastrous Altamont concert. It highlights how the event's violence and logistical failures mark the end of the 1960s counterculture dream.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate