Good Luck, Have Fun, Don't Die (2026)

The critic calls the film a riotous and blood-curdlingly timely science fiction satire about humanity’s last stand against AI, praising its grippingly unpredictable energy and sharp observations on tech’s absurd yet grim effects.

The critic praises the film as a fun techno-horror wake-up call that effectively mixes awkward humor with surrealist technological horror, likening it to a 21st-century Bosch painting and highlighting Verbinski’s confident control and bizarre ambition.

The critic calls the film audacious, fresh and a massive amount of fun despite a confusing final act, praising its clever, unpretentious energy and wild originality. It singles out the strong Black Mirror-style vignettes, especially Juno Temple’s troubling yet funny cloning storyline.

The film is a playful, sharp action-comedy that spins AI concerns into timely entertainment with creative spark and energetic direction, though its structure can feel haphazard. It warns about technology's dangers while celebrating the cast, especially Sam Rockwell's charismatic lead performance.

The critic finds fun to be had in Verbinski’s satisfyingly tech-fearing sci-fi comedy adventure but notes it is lively yet overstuffed and could use more restraint. The human mess of the film and standout performances, particularly from Haley Lu Richardson, are singled out positively amid the excess.

Verbinski’s maniacal farce is a sly sci-fi satire about stopping a tech-pocalypse, with an intricate, angry, and ambitious script that feels like a feat to get made. It explores how the internet’s promise has soured through flashbacks and mean observations on digital life.

The critic describes a rowdy sci-fi caper in which Verbinski shares anxiety about AI before mapping salvation, noting it is more curious than it sounds with Black Mirror-lite vignettes indicting tech-addled times.

The critic finds the film a reasonably entertaining gonzo sci-fi comedy thanks to its appealing cast and Verbinski’s kinetic action set pieces, but notes it falls short of its title’s sardonic promise due to an only occasionally funny or fresh script and an indulgent runtime.

The critic finds the film a fun tech-paranoia caper that empathizes with frustration over AI dominance but notes many dated gags and clichés. It praises the satirical bite in the characters' backstories while acknowledging the mix of shrewd observation and outmoded humour.

The critic finds the film messy and madcap but ultimately entertaining, with fun amid the mayhem in this time-travel AI-apocalypse story. They single out Sam Rockwell’s immensely fun, manic performance as the standout element.

Gore Verbinski returns with a weird, wild dystopian sci-fi about repeatedly trying to stop a rogue AI, full of ideas and ready to explode at any moment. The story centers on a time traveler assembling a team in a diner to prevent humanity's doom.

Verbinski makes a raucous comeback with an irreverent, wildly inventive sci-fi comedy about a time-loop mission to curb AI, led by Sam Rockwell’s wild-eyed performance. The script is hyper-referential and satirical but can’t decide if society should be saved or scolded.

The critic describes an audacious, irreverent action-satire that taps into tech anxieties but proves too glib and nihilistic in execution. It singles out the lack of a sufficient human element and notes the film may find cult status rather than mainstream success.

The critic calls the film a disappointing slog and gobsmackingly bad, with hacky, dated satirical broadsides against technology that feel like rejected Black Mirror episodes. It singles out one moderately original cloning concept but faults the overall narrative collapse, hideous CGI and relentless nonsense.

The critic finds the AI-focused apocalypse comedy from Gore Verbinski both unhinged and dull, noting it starts promisingly with Sam Rockwell but becomes unwieldy due to cumbersome flashbacks and an anticlimactic confrontation.

The critic finds the film a sci-fi snooze with nothing new to say about online times, calling the screenplay sloppy and AI-like with leaden exposition and bad CGI. It singles out the failure to deliver on its potential as searing commentary, resulting in a 404 error message instead.

The critic calls it a bold, hilarious sci-fi adventure with a great cast and timely anti-AI commentary that starts like Repo Man and ends like Akira. They single out the absurdist humor blended with heart in its treatment of technology and school shootings for praise, while noting it loses some steam in the metaphysical finale.

The critic finds the film audacious and original in its dark satire on AI and modern ennui, but notes the humor is more mean than mirthful and the third act overstays its welcome; praises the subversion of time-loop tropes and Rockwell's performance.

The critic views the film as a welcome, ramshackle return for Verbinski that delivers a frequent blast of dark comedy and big ideas, even if not everything connects. They single out Sam Rockwell's charismatic, unhinged lead performance as essential to sustaining the off-kilter energy amid the chaos.