
Most critics like it, and most of them like it a little less than the first film. The praise gathers around the characters rather than the plot: the crew are given interior lives, the family material about fathers and siblings carries real feeling, and the jokes mostly land. Baby Groot, Rocket and Drax are singled out repeatedly, as is the soundtrack, and James Gunn is credited with keeping the focus on his ensemble while the scale grows.
The reservations are consistent even among admirers. The plot is thin, the second act sags, the running time is long and several of the jokes come round twice. The spread is wide. British reviews are warm, with the Guardian the coolest of them, finding the whole thing amiable but pointless. The sharpest dissent comes from a bloc of American outlets, among them the Hollywood Reporter, Variety and the New York Times, which find the film strained, the bickering grating and the charm of the original mislaid. The sentiment divides them most: earned for some, forced for others.
E
Empire
24 April 2017 · Chris Hewitt
80*
Gunn has done it again, crafting a sequel that keeps the focus on the characters while adding genuine emotion beneath the sass. It is not quite as fresh as the original but remains a triumph.
Read the full review →E
Evening Standard
21 November 2017 · Matthew Norman
80*
The sequel adds emotional heft and psychological conflicts while preserving the ironic wit, making the emotional elements feel natural without cheap sentimentality. It is every inch an equal to the original despite some pacing slackening.
Read the full review →S
Slant Magazine
2 May 2017 · Jake Cole
80*
The critic praises the film for escalating action scale and inventive sequences while delivering the finest sustained emotional storytelling in a Marvel production through its family themes. Some repetitive jokes and cutesy elements undermine the irreverent tone at times.
Read the full review →I
The Independent
26 April 2017 · ★★★★
80
The sequel gives even the most outlandish characters an interior life and blends humour, action and soul-searching almost perfectly. It risks turning overly sentimental in the final reel.
Read the full review →T
The Telegraph
28 April 2017 · ★★★★ · Robbie Collin
80
The playful space sequel looks like an explosion in a nursery school craft cupboard and feels like another yarn from the comic-book annals.
Read the full review →S
Screen Daily
24 April 2017
70*
The critic calls it a lively and unabashedly sentimental sequel that turns into a family affair, with dynamic visuals, emotional depth in character arcs involving fathers and siblings, and genuine pathos beneath the sarcasm, though it can feel overstuffed.
Read the full review →S
Sight and Sound
27 April 2017 · Kim Newman
70*
The critic finds it an enjoyably nostalgic sequel with fun elements, witty soundtrack choices and engaging characters like Mantis, but notes the novelty is wearing thin with repetitive jokes and small personal stories that hamper the sense of infinite wonder.
Read the full review →T
The Times
28 April 2017 · ★★★★☆ · Kate Muir
70*
It recycles the successful formula of the first film with witty ribbing between the crew and an inane musical background to the intergalactic action.
Read the full review →T
Total Film
24 April 2017 · Lauren O'Callaghan
70*
The film delivers action, humour and strong character moments with Baby Groot stealing scenes, but struggles to recapture the original's magic due to forced emotions and obvious one-liners. It remains a damn good movie that fans will enjoy.
Read the full review →G
The Guardian
24 April 2017 · Peter Bradshaw
65*
The sequel is amiable and goofy with plenty of comedy and cartoony action, but suffers from a weird air of pointlessness and plotlessness.
Read the full review →L
Los Angeles Times
3 May 2017 · Kenneth Turan
30*
The magic of the first film has taken a serious hit due to prosperity and anxiety, with irreverence becoming dogma. It is not without successful elements but tries too hard to repeat the original's success.
Read the full review →H
The Hollywood Reporter
24 April 2017 · Todd McCarthy
30*
The critic finds the sequel less charming than the first, with the misfit characters now grating and bickering unamusingly while the action feels rote and been-there-done-that. The father-son scenes between Chris Pratt and Kurt Russell stand out as the best and most meaningful.
Read the full review →N
The New Yorker
8 May 2017 · Anthony Lane
30*
The film starts with silliness and pep but splutters when it treats the quest for meaning seriously, leading to a noisy climax. The genial balance of the first film has been mislaid.
Read the full review →N
The New York Times
4 May 2017 · Manohla Dargis
30*
The sequel has the digital effects and self-aware humor of the first but feels strained as if everyone is trying too hard. It has visual attractions but lacks a resonant origin story and narrative depth.
Read the full review →V
Variety
24 April 2017 · Owen Gleiberman
30*
It is a witty and extravagant followup but works harder for less fun than the first film. The director is trying too hard, making it a smaller deal despite being an adventure worth taking.
Read the full review →H
HeyUGuys
24 April 2017 · ★★★★★ · Stefan Pape
100
The film is a masterclass in storytelling that balances irreverent fun with poignant human themes and an emotional core. Gunn excels at developing well-rounded characters with nuanced arcs for the full ensemble.
Read the full review →D
Deadline
24 April 2017 · Pete Hammond
90*
The critic praises the film for its entertaining cast and characters, the best in any Marvel movie, noting it maintains the charm despite being bigger, and highlights the fun soundtrack and post-credits scenes. He credits James Gunn for preserving the likability and wit while expanding the scope, singling out Baby Groot, Rocket, Drax, and the eclectic soundtrack.
Read the full review →C
Collider
4 May 2017 · B+ · Haleigh Foutch
83
The critic finds the film uproariously funny with strong emotional depth in its family themes and character arcs, but notes it falls short of the original's freshness and has some tonal imbalances.
Read the full review →D
Digital Spy
28 April 2017 · Hugh Armitage
80*
The critic affirms that Gunn delivers again with deeper emotional arcs for the large cast and balanced action-comedy, though notes a flabby second act and excessive length. Praises the performances and character development.
Read the full review →/
/Film
5 May 2017 · 8/10 · Jack Giroux
80
Gunn prioritizes character and ensemble moments over a light plot, delivering emotional depth in relationships like those between Gamora and Nebula or involving Yondu. The film bursts with personality and offers satisfying growth for its heroes.
Read the full review →D
Den of Geek
4 May 2017 · 4 out of 5 · Don Kaye
70*
The critic says it succeeds as a character piece with satisfying arcs for the team, but notes a slender plot and meandering second act. Praises the added depth to characters and the moving conclusion.
Read the full review →The review describes the sequel as enjoyable filler for fans, with engaging banter and emotional moments among the characters, but criticizes it for not advancing the story meaningfully or matching the first film's freshness. It singles out the interplay between the heroes and the charm of baby Groot for praise.
Read the full review →R
The Ringer
5 May 2017 · K. Austin Collins
65*
The critic calls the film an undeniable mess overlong and complex with too many daddy issues, but praises its endearing sweet tone, humor in action set pieces, and willingness to be corny.
Read the full review →P
Polygon
24 April 2017 · Susana Polo
60*
The critic says the film fails to expand on its premise or take characters anywhere unexpected, making it just more of the same, but praises its stunning visuals, clever action, and ability to still move the viewer emotionally.
Read the full review →Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate