Critics’ reviews

Hachi: A Dog's Tale (2009)

10 reviews from 10 publications. Critics’ score 59: 2 positive, 4 mixed, 1 negative.

Back to our review of Hachi: A Dog's Tale

59
Positive
2
Mixed
4
Negative
1

The reviews lean towards a mixed response, with broad recognition that Hachi: A Dog’s Tale can move an audience, particularly one fond of dogs. Praise centres on the gently handled bond between man and animal and Lasse Hallström’s restrained direction. The warmer notices find tenderness rather than cheap sentiment: Radio Times considers Richard Gere well cast, while Empire praises the underplayed relationship and the film’s effectiveness as a tearjerker.

The divide is over how carefully that emotion is earned. Several critics find the treatment sensitive, but others see calculated sentiment, repetition and thin human drama. Variety questions the lack of a substantial human story, while The Independent is markedly harsher, finding the family and small-town scenes unconvincing and the piano score irritating. The spread is wide: what supporters regard as simplicity and restraint, detractors find bland or commercially calculated.

Empire
12 March 2010 · Kim Newman
80*

The critic praises the film as an effective tear-jerker that avoids irritating schmaltz. They single out the underplayed man-and-dog romance and Hallström’s assured direction for praise.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
17 June 2009 · festival review
70*

The film is no masterpiece but delivers as a reliable tearjerker sure to win over family audiences with its story of canine loyalty. It singles out the final moments as absolutely devastating and praises the dog's star presence along with the score's enhancement of poignancy.

Read the full review →
Evening Standard
21 November 2013
60*

The critic calls the story extraordinary and touching but notes it is told with too commercial an eye. They single out the calculated sentiment and box-office focus for mild complaint.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★ · Trevor Johnston
60

A lovely family drama inspired by a famous true-life case of canine devotion, with Richard Gere well cast as the music professor who takes in the Akita puppy. Director Lasse Hallström avoids cheap sentiment, treating the bond between man and dog with tender gravitas so that subsequent events prove moving rather than manipulative.

Read the full review →
Time Out
9 March 2010 · ★★★ · Derek Adams
60

Lasse Hallström’s unfussy film, transplanted to contemporary New England, tells the moving true story of a faithful Akita who waits nearly a decade at a railway station after his owner dies. Sensitively directed and rarely over-sentimental, it will likely ravish dog lovers while also addressing the emotional fallout of death.

Read the full review →
The Independent
12 March 2010
20*

The critic finds the film bland beyond endurance and dismisses it as mush. They single out the unconvincing family and small-town scenes, along with the irritating piano score, for complaint.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
11 March 2010 · Cath Clarke

Lasse Hallström serves up classy mediocrity in this straightforward story of canine loyalty. The film offers gentle observations on grief and pets that will likely move viewers to tears of boredom or emotion.

Read the full review →
The Times
12 March 2010 · Wendy Ide

The film is a Greyfriars Bobby-type tale of canine devotion that undermines what is left of director Lasse Hallström’s reputation and confirms him as the Hallmark greeting card of movie-makers.

Read the full review →
Variety
14 June 2009 · festival review · Alissa Simon

The film is a sentimental, repetitive tale of a professor bonding with a loyal Akita that harks back to earlier era values. It is a simple tearjerker demonstrating unconditional love but lacks dramatic human story.

Read the full review →
Digital Spy
10 March 2010 · Simon Reynolds
65*

The film offers gentle sweetness and the dog's enduring cuteness that will appeal to dog lovers and younger viewers, with an unusual focus on a dog's grief after loss. It drags in places with workmanlike direction and some hilariously bad scenes, though it is better than many recent canine films.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate