Critics’ reviews

Halloween (1978)

16 reviews from 16 publications. Critics’ score 80: 13 positive, 2 mixed, 1 negative.

Back to our review of Halloween

80
Positive
13
Mixed
2
Negative
1

Most critics regard Halloween as a highly effective horror film whose influence rests on precise, economical filmmaking. Praise centres on John Carpenter’s control of suspense, particularly the point-of-view shots, widescreen framing and patient stalking sequences that make ordinary domestic spaces threatening. His minimalist score is another consistent source of admiration, while several reviews credit implication rather than gore with sustaining the dread. Jamie Lee Curtis’s performance also earns praise, though the direction attracts the strongest agreement.

The spread is wide despite the strongly positive majority. Reservations concern the familiar maniac-on-the-loose story, limited characterisation and whether familiarity with the film’s methods has reduced their power to frighten. Collider finds the reputation disproportionate to the experience, citing slow pacing and unconvincing performances while acknowledging effective suspense. The Times offers the sharpest dissent, arguing that Carpenter sometimes loses control of chilling situations and produces horror-comic effects instead of shocks.

Radio Times
★★★★★ · Alan Jones
100

The critic calls it a simple but horribly effective low-budget suburban horror that practically patented the slasher genre and launched Jamie Lee Curtis as a scream queen. It singles out the expertly plotted structure that builds from broad daylight to bloody crescendos, along with Carpenter’s own pulsating score that keeps the power to grip and jolt undiminished.

Read the full review →
Time Out
21 September 2024 · ★★★★★ · Tom Huddleston
100

The review celebrates the film as the genre-spawning slasher that remains a harrowing ride and the blueprint for the entire subgenre. It singles out Carpenter’s taut direction, economical storytelling, innovative use of the frame and Steadicam POV shots, and the ordinary domestic setting that makes the terror intimate and effective.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · Adam Smith
90*

The critic hails the film as a ruthless, elegant thrill machine that changed horror cinema and ranks it among the most important entries in the genre after Frankenstein. They single out the innovative use of point-of-view shots, widescreen compositions, and Carpenter's synth score for particular praise.

Read the full review →
Sight and Sound
23 October 2024 · Richard Combs
90*

The critic hails the film as one of cinema’s most perfectly engineered devices for delivering scares, an emotional rather than intellectual experience that illustrates Carpenter’s philosophy of audience involvement. It singles out the director’s virtuoso, self-conscious style of manipulation, particularly the prolonged subjective tracking shots and elegant compositions that heighten anticipation without psychological or sociological pretensions.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
28 October 2012
90*

John Carpenter's 1978 film is the ultimate refined slasher movie, spawned by Hitchcock's Psycho. The director highlights its virtuoso opening shot, low-budget ingenuity, eerie score by Carpenter himself, and striking cinematography by Dean Cundey.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
17 October 2018 · Critic’s Pick · Jason Zinoman
90*

The review positions the original Halloween as a relentlessly terrifying masterpiece and experimental art film that has aged exceptionally well due to its bare-bones approach. It singles out the precision and timing of the chilling chase scenes as evidence of Carpenter's understanding of resonant scariness.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
7 October 2013 · Eric Henderson
85*

The review praises the film as a singular, influential work whose simplicity and skill in orchestrating frights set it apart, positioning Carpenter as a poet of violent intent through masterful direction and score. It highlights the film's use of implication over gore and its clean, efficient blueprint for the genre.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
14 December 2012 · Jim Emerson
80*

The post highlights how John Carpenter's Halloween succeeds through precise, meaningful framing and visual storytelling rather than conventional narrative elements. It praises the film's power derived almost entirely from its imagery and direction while noting the script's attempt at cosmic-evil explanation as its least satisfying aspect.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
1 November 2014 · Ron Pennington
80*

The critic finds the film tense and frightening, an effective horror entry that builds a properly terrifying atmosphere through well-paced direction. Carpenter avoids excessive blood and gore, heightening the effect through implication, with strong performances especially from Jamie Lee Curtis.

Read the full review →
Variety
31 December 1977 · Variety Staff
60*

The review finds that after a promising opening Halloween settles into a standard maniac-on-the-loose story, yet director John Carpenter times the gore effectively to deliver thrills throughout the 93-minute runtime. It notes the predictable conclusion and Hitchcockian influences but credits the pacing for sustaining interest.

Read the full review →
The Times
9 February 1979 · Patrick Gibbs
30*

The reviewer expresses disappointment with Carpenter's horror thriller despite its economical scale and strong earlier films. Control of chilling situations is sometimes lost, leading to horror-comic effects rather than real shocks.

Read the full review →
Den of Geek
23 November 2012 · Claire Donner
90*

The review praises Carpenter's classic as a potent examination of inexplicable evil in ordinary settings, especially resonant during economic turmoil. It singles out the film's portrayal of Michael Myers as an unstoppable, arbitrary force of pure evil for particular note.

Read the full review →
Paste
20 September 2019 · Jim Vorel
90*

The critic calls Halloween the definitive slasher and a masterwork that has aged sublimely, crediting it with launching the genre's wave of imitators. He singles out John Carpenter's potent vision, iconic score, and stalking techniques for creating profound dread with minimal elements.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
8 November 2001 · Gator MacReady
70*

The critic notes that Halloween made its mark as the original slasher movie and was once terrifying due to its senseless killings, but has lost some power over time as audiences grew familiar with the genre. It praises the anamorphic widescreen photography, POV camerawork, and calls it a landmark film that will always remain a classic.

Read the full review →
The Playlist
28 October 2018 · Julia Teti
70*

The piece highlights how Halloween paved the way for future slasher films by popularizing tropes without overdoing them and creating a lasting impact through its formula. It singles out the minimalist score by Carpenter as a major enduring component that sticks with audiences.

Read the full review →
Collider
31 October 2022 · C+ · William Fischer
63

The critic finds the 1978 original underwhelming relative to its legacy, with strong suspense moments undermined by unconvincing performances, slow pacing, and a thinly drawn villain. He praises the effective point-of-view camerawork paired with Carpenter's score for building Michael's presence.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate