Critics’ reviews

Hamlet (1990)

7 reviews from 7 publications. Critics’ score 64: 2 positive, 4 mixed, 1 negative.

Back to our review of Hamlet

64
Positive
2
Mixed
4
Negative
1

The recorded scores suggest a mixed reception for Zeffirelli’s Hamlet, with praise clustering around the performances. In the accessible reviews, Mel Gibson’s energetic, physical approach attracts approval even from critics with reservations about the adaptation. His humour also earns notice, while Helena Bonham Carter’s Ophelia and Glenn Close’s Gertrude receive individual praise. The favourable accounts value a vigorous, unfussy approach to Shakespeare rather than solemn reverence.

The division concerns how much that vigour achieves. Eye for Film finds Zeffirelli’s gamble successful, while Empire admires Gibson but finds the adaptation short on inspiration and audacity. The Los Angeles Times offers the sharpest objection: attractive images and creditable acting cannot compensate for coldness and the lack of a compelling interpretation. The scores span considerable enthusiasm to disappointment, but three review texts are unavailable, limiting how confidently their reasons can be included in the consensus.

Radio Times
★★★★ · David Parkinson
80

Parkinson finds Zeffirelli’s adaptation surprisingly vigorous and gives a positive verdict. He praises Mel Gibson’s performance as Hamlet and Helena Bonham Carter’s portrayal of Ophelia.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
19 December 1990 · Janet Maslin
65*

The New York Times page identifies this as a review of Zeffirelli’s Hamlet. The review text is inaccessible, so its verdict and specific praise or complaint cannot be established.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
· Roger Ebert
64*

The page could not be accessed, so the critic’s verdict is unavailable. No praise or complaint can be reliably identified from the accessible text.

Read the full review →
Time Out
· SGr
64*

The page identifies a review, but its verdict cannot be determined from the available text. No specific praise or complaint is available to report.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 1990 · Angie Errigo
50*

Errigo finds the film a mixed bag that ultimately holds its own, though it may leave some viewers indifferent or sleepy. She praises Mel Gibson’s vigorous, humorous performance, while finding the adaptation short on inspiration and audacity.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
19 December 1990 · MICHAEL WILMINGTON
40*

Wilmington finds the film visually lovely and Gibson creditable, but ultimately cold and lacking a compelling interpretation. He especially praises Glenn Close, whose Gertrude brings electrifying shame and desire to her scenes.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
19 December 2005 · Angus Wolfe Murray
90*

The critic finds Zeffirelli’s gamble successful and praises the film’s lively, unfussy approach to Shakespeare. Gibson’s energetic, physical performance as Hamlet is singled out as especially compelling.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate