Critics’ reviews

Hamlet (2000)

10 reviews from 10 publications. Critics’ score 63: 5 positive, 2 mixed, 3 negative.

Back to our review of Hamlet

63
Positive
5
Mixed
2
Negative
3

Most critics lean warm on Michael Almereyda’s decision to move the play to corporate Manhattan, with the first American notices the most enthusiastic. Praise clusters on the setting itself: the city treated as a character, the surveillance cameras and video diaries that lend the prince his paranoia, and the way modern trappings make familiar lines sound new. The supporting cast is the other point of agreement, Bill Murray’s Polonius and Julia Stiles’s Ophelia singled out even by reviewers who like little else.

The reservations gather around Ethan Hawke. Several reviews find his slacker prince too passive to hold the centre, and the harsher notices say much of the cast cannot speak the verse. Others feel the cutting truncates the story, blunts its political edge and never reaches tragic weight. The spread is wide, from the Los Angeles Times’s near-rave to Total Film calling it tedious and crass, with the later British reviews markedly cooler than the American ones.

Los Angeles Times
12 May 2000
90*

The critic highlights the vigor, insight, and originality of setting the story in present-day Manhattan, making Shakespeare accessible and provocative. Hawke delivers a superb performance as a youthful yet insightful prince in a gritty indie-style production.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
12 May 2000 · Elvis Mitchell
85*

The critic praises Almereyda for rooting the adaptation in contemporary Manhattan, turning the city into a complex character full of beauty and squalor. The film is described as a vital, sharply intelligent update layered with paranoia from constant surveillance technology.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
15 December 2000 · Peter Bradshaw
80*

The critic praises this stylish, inventive modern-dress Hamlet set in corporate New York as an intelligent and energetic take that refreshingly defamiliarises the play. He singles out the strong supporting turns, especially Julia Stiles as Ophelia and Bill Murray as Polonius, while noting some issues with the handling of soliloquies and loss of political edge.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
8 May 2000 · David Denby
80*

The critic is charmed and gripped by the modern-dress staging in corporate New York, calling it a ripely melancholy version that is not a travesty despite some contemporary translations. It features a mischievous intelligence and sullen beauty, with effective use of video and setting.

Read the full review →
Time Out
10 September 2012 · TCh
72*

The film updates the story to contemporary New York with a slacker prince using gadgets and media, modernizing and streamlining the play without trivializing it. It amplifies poetic melodrama with ingenuity and energy but fails to muster tragic grandeur.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
29 March 2002 · Scott Tobias
60*

The critic notes that Almereyda's modern corporate New York transposition is often a mess with a truncated story and mangled dialogue, but praises its inventive staging that uses incongruities between Shakespearean language and contemporary banality to illuminating effect.

Read the full review →
Variety
31 January 2000 · festival review
55*

The review finds the slacker prince a weak center in an otherwise conceptually vivid contemporary update, with fine support performances but an oft-ludicrous portrait. It is sporadically striking but never fully engrossing, with strong tech aspects.

Read the full review →
Evening Standard
10 April 2012
40*

The critic views the updated version as shallow and reductive despite some inventive gimmickry, with an atmosphere of corporate sleaze and a failure by most of the cast to deliver Shakespeare's verse effectively. They single out the innovative use of CCTV and digital cameras as the production's best feature.

Read the full review →
Total Film
15 December 2000
20*

The critic finds Almereyda's modern update tedious and crass, with a stifling production design that feels alienating and a cast unable to deliver the material convincingly. They single out the drab scenery and lacklustre performances, particularly Ethan Hawke as Hamlet, as major failings.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
31 August 2001 · Angus Wolfe Murray
35*

The modern-dress update with technology gimmicks fails to make Hamlet more interesting, and Ethan Hawke lacks the necessary danger and energy as the prince. Bill Murray provides some compensation in a supporting role.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate