Critics’ reviews

Happy Together (1997)

9 reviews from 9 publications. Critics’ score 67: 7 positive, 0 mixed, 2 negative.

Back to our review of Happy Together

67
Positive
7
Mixed
0
Negative
2

Most critics like it, and the praise clusters on how it looks. Christopher Doyle’s photography of Buenos Aires draws admiration nearly everywhere, as does Wong Kar-wai’s loose, fragmented way of cutting, which several reviews say matches the couple’s on-again, off-again pattern. Tony Leung’s lead performance is singled out, and more than one critic finds the film wiser and more heartfelt than Wong’s earlier Hong Kong work, with the quieter, non-sexual friendship at its heart named as the emotional centre.

The spread is wide. Two of the nine reviews are plainly negative, and for related reasons: Empire calls it style over substance, with the imagery carrying viewers through erratic plotting and little emotional weight, and The Guardian finds the endless quarrels and the selfish central pair hard to sit with. Even some admirers concede the film is sour on love and claustrophobic. The argument is whether the beauty earns the misery.

The AV Club
9 June 2010 · A- · Scott Tobias
90

The film argues for the essentiality of doomed relationships through its on-again/off-again gay lovers in Buenos Aires. Wong's improvisational style and lush imagery from Christopher Doyle create a wistful, wise tone despite the co-dependency and heartache.

Read the full review →
Time Out
7 January 2015 · TR
85*

Wong Kar-Wai and cameraman Chris Doyle have crafted their most lyrical film. The romance between two gay men from Hong Kong ends soon after they arrive in Argentina, crystallising the anxieties and hopes of Hong Kong people on the eve of the return to China.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
4 June 2010 · Eric Henderson
80*

Wong's 1997 film is a mass of contradictions, mostly sour on love but filmed with romanticism; it is a vibrant, colorful gay classic about two men joined and repelled by intimacy and repulsion.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
10 October 1997 · festival review · Stephen Holden
75*

The critic describes the film as a more coherent and heartfelt work than Wong's earlier fantastical Hong Kong films. He singles out the poignant, nonsexual friendship that becomes the emotional center, capturing youth's restless spirit with piercing sadness.

Read the full review →
Little White Lies
16 July 2017 · David Pountain
70*

The film is a deeply affecting portrait of a failing relationship between two men whose on-again, off-again dynamic in Argentina becomes a volatile, claustrophobic addiction marked by fighting and emotional wreckage. Wong's restless, fragmented style underscores the couple's destructive patterns while hinting at personal renewal for the one who learns to let go.

Read the full review →
The Independent
23 January 2009
70*

Describes the film as Wong's most left-field offering among three masterpieces in a DVD collection, focusing on an expatriate gay couple from Hong Kong living in Buenos Aires.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · Ian Freer
30*

The film is a triumph of style over substance, with dazzling imagery and novel editing that pull viewers through despite a lack of emotional wallop. It ultimately falls short of being as engaging or heartfelt as it should be due to erratic plotting.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
16 January 2004
30*

The film struggles to match the mood of Wong's earlier works because of its focus on endless lovers' quarrels and selfish central characters. Wong's stylistically unique approach and Tony Leung's strong lead performance are singled out as positives.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
19 January 2001 · Angus Wolfe Murray
70*

The critic praises Wong Kar-wai for breaking rules with a dysfunctional plot and handheld camerawork that captures loneliness and despair. The ironic title and avoidance of gay stereotypes are highlighted as strengths in this exploration of a troubled relationship.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate