Critics’ reviews

Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix (2007)

14 reviews from 14 publications. Critics’ score 69: 10 positive, 4 mixed, 0 negative.

Back to our review of Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix

69
Positive
10
Mixed
4
Negative
0

Most critics come down in favour, and none against. The praise gathers almost entirely around Imelda Staunton, whose Dolores Umbridge is named in review after review as the film’s standout, the one element that gives this fifth entry a character of its own. David Yates gets steady credit for a confident first outing, cutting the longest book to date into a swift, serious and often tense film, with the Ministry of Magic sequences and the effects work singled out, and Evanna Lynch’s Luna Lovegood drawing warm notices.

The reservations cluster around what the darkness costs. Several critics miss the charm and levity of earlier films, note that Quidditch has gone, and find the condensed story episodic, with characters and subplots shortchanged and a climax that lands softly. The spread is real but not wide: The Hollywood Reporter calls it the least enjoyable instalment so far, while Eye for Film and The Skinny call it the best in the series.

Empire
8 July 2007 · Helen O'Hara
80*

The review finds this the most filmic Potter entry so far, suspenseful and action-packed, though unlikely to win over non-fans. It singles out director David Yates and writer Michael Goldenberg for turning the book's bulk into a taut, grown-up adventure with strong supporting turns, especially Imelda Staunton's Umbridge.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
4 out of 5 · Jamie Healy
70*

The film maintains the magic while embracing a resolutely dark mood in an engrossing fifth entry, with Yates instilling wonder and delivering a spellbinding finale of good versus evil. Some characters and subplots are shortchanged in the adaptation, though standout turns like Staunton's Umbridge provide relief.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
13 July 2007 · B- · Scott Tobias
70

The critic describes the film as workmanlike and complacent at times, with a dark mood that it does not soft-pedal. He singles out Imelda Staunton's performance as the standout element amid an otherwise unmemorable entry focused on plot delivery.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
10 July 2007 · A.O. Scott
70*

The critic finds it a sleek, swift and exciting adaptation of the longest novel to date that proceeds as a tense political thriller. It is absorbing but not transporting, a collection of interesting moments rather than a fully integrated experience.

Read the full review →
Time Out
9 July 2007 · 3 out of 5 stars · Wally Hammond
70*

The new director takes a serious, grave approach that keeps the film moving efficiently in a crisp 138 minutes but excises some charm and levity like Quidditch scenes. Strong performances, inventive production design, and thrilling set-pieces stand out amid the darker tone.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
10 July 2007 · Kenneth Turan
60*

Yates consolidates gains without an overpowering style in this way station of a film; the visuals and work with the young cast are strong, but it cannot shake an episodic feeling that makes developing momentum difficult.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
13 July 2007 · ★★★ · Peter Bradshaw
60

The film continues the series' formula with a focus on Harry's first kiss and battles against bureaucratic authoritarianism at Hogwarts led by Dolores Umbridge. It remains solid family entertainment but feels repetitive with forgettable plot twists.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
10 July 2007
55*

The critic notes that the buoyant disposition of the series has been replaced by dread and an adult sensibility, praising Imelda Staunton's villainous performance but criticizing the disjointed, overstuffed narrative and lack of resolution or punch in the climax.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
29 June 2007 · Kirk Honeycutt
45*

The critic finds the film full of plot but lacking in magic and fun, calling it the least enjoyable installment so far despite being necessary for the story. He notes a grim mood and color scheme with respectable direction and adaptation but highlights the absence of movie magic.

Read the full review →
Den of Geek
17 July 2007 · Lucy Felthouse
85*

The film is a must-see for fans and potentially enjoyable even for non-fans, delivering excitement and emotional depth as the darkest entry yet. The critic singles out the impressive special effects, particularly the Ministry of Magic sequences, and the strong character development including a standout annoying Dolores Umbridge.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
11 July 2007 · Andrew Robertson
85*

The critic calls it a well-crafted and confident continuation that is probably the best in the series, praising the handling of themes, performances especially by Staunton as Umbridge and Lynch as Luna, and the effects, while noting some choices in condensing the book.

Read the full review →
Digital Spy
8 July 2007 · Nick Levine
80*

The Order of the Phoenix marks a bold step forward for the franchise as Harry grows up amid rising threats from Voldemort. The critic singles out Imelda Staunton's deliciously despicable turn as Umbridge for establishing the film's own identity beyond previous entries.

Read the full review →
/Film
11 July 2007 · 8/10 · Peter Sciretta
80

The critic praises the visual effects, direction by Yates, and performances especially Evanna Lynch as Luna Lovegood and Imelda Staunton as Umbridge, while noting issues with the condensed story from the book and wishing for more character moments. Verdict is positive but wanting more.

Read the full review →
The Skinny
7 November 2007 · ★★★★ · Jack McFarlane
80

This fifth instalment is the strongest in the series so far, with a well-handled darker narrative and eye-popping action set pieces that improve on prior films. Director David Yates makes an impressive debut and the adaptation effectively uses pre-established characters to push cinematic buttons.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate