Critics’ reviews

Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban (2004)

18 reviews from 18 publications. Critics’ score 77: 15 positive, 3 mixed, 0 negative.

Back to our review of Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

77
Positive
15
Mixed
3
Negative
0

Most critics call this the best of the three Potter films so far, and nearly all the credit goes to Alfonso Cuarón. The reviews agree he has darkened the series, in its lighting and its mood, and given it an atmosphere the first two lacked: wintry Scottish scenery, wide lenses, a spookier Hogwarts. The set-pieces are singled out repeatedly, the Hippogriff flight and the Dementor confrontations above all, along with a time-jumping climax several find the most satisfying stretch of the series. Many also think the young leads have grown into their roles.

The reservations cluster on the plot. Several critics find the storytelling murkier than before, with too much left unexplained; The Independent argues that vital information has been cut so the central mystery never resolves, and Variety thinks the story never coalesces. The Guardian finds it less engaging than its predecessors. Nobody dislikes it, though, and the spread is narrow: even the mixed notices admire the look of it.

Slant Magazine
31 March 2004 · Ed Gonzalez
90*

Cuarón brings big ideas and internal conflict to the series, focusing obsessively on Harry’s psychological evolution into a young adult through suggestive, expressionistic compositions and a meta showdown with time and self. The film trades action for a boy confronting the perils of time and his own fears rather than a big scary animal.

Read the full review →
The Times
30 May 2024 · ★★★★☆ · Kevin Maher
90*

Cuarón attacks the material with auteur instincts, darkening everything literally and thematically to deliver the series' pinnacle with a bravura time-jumping climax.

Read the full review →
Total Film
31 May 2004
90*

Given the best book, Cuarón delivers the best film yet by streamlining the plot, adding stylistic coherence with a darker, dynamic visual approach and goosebump-inducing set-pieces like the Buckbeak flight and Dementor confrontations. The young leads are uneven (only Watson truly acts), but the atmosphere and spectacle make it a franchise high point.

Read the full review →
Screen Daily
28 May 2004
85*

Cuarón delivers a genuinely spooky and emotionally involving adventure that gives the Potter world much-needed character and atmosphere through a distinctive, austere vision.

Read the full review →
The Telegraph
· David Gritten
85*

Cuarón's direction marks a huge stride forward, making the film far more visually striking and finally doing justice to Rowling's imagination in what is easily the best story of the three books filmed so far.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★★ · Dave Aldridge
80

Cuarón brings a darker, edgier, scarier feel to the series while the young leads grow into their roles and fun elements like the Knight Bus remain.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
3 June 2004 · A. O. Scott
80*

The critic hails Cuarón's direction as a step up, noting the film is the most interesting of the three Potter movies for looking and feeling like a real film with emotional force and visual panache, while acknowledging some plot sacrifices.

Read the full review →
Time Out
11 July 2011 · WH
80*

Cuarón's direction makes it the most interesting of the three Potter films, with deeper characterization of the adolescent leads and a more wintry, thoughtful tone reflecting the source material.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
3 June 2004
75*

The critic notes the film comes close to capturing the essence of the books especially in its final hour, crediting Cuarón for breaking free with convincing young performances and heartfelt magic despite initial constraints from the series formula.

Read the full review →
Empire
31 May 2004 · Colin Kennedy
70*

Cuarón comprehensively re-imagines the Potter aesthetic with visual flair, wide-angle lenses, dynamic camerawork and a grounded Muggle-world feel, delivering the series' best SFX and rousing climax. The young cast remains limited and the narrative engine still has issues, but it hauls the franchise up to the books' standards.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
3 June 2004 · Roger Ebert
70*

The critic finds the film not quite as good as the first two due to murkier plotting that requires more explanation, but praises the darker, more menacing tone and Cuarón's visual style along with strong performances from the young leads and supporting cast.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
1 June 2004 · Scott Tobias
70*

Cuarón successfully infuses the material with his own vision while staying true to the source, making the film darker and more whimsical than its predecessors. The result is a collection of minor improvements in acting, storytelling, and effects integration that mark a clear step forward for the series.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
28 May 2004 · Peter Bradshaw
65*

The film introduces a darker, more grown-up tone under Cuarón but feels less consistently engaging than its predecessors, with strong set pieces undermined by occasional lapses in pacing and a retreat into a more insular wizard world.

Read the full review →
Variety
28 May 2004 · Brian Lowry
60*

The critic finds the film visually dazzling and darker with a bold stylistic shift by Cuarón, but notes it suffers from a disjointed narrative that feels less accessible and never quite coalesces into a fully realized story despite thrilling moments.

Read the full review →
The Independent
29 May 2004 · Nicholas Barber
50*

Cuarón introduces the missing ingredient of magic through spooky gags, atmospheric shadows, and especially natural scenery from Glen Coe. The focus on atmosphere comes at the expense of plot coherence, with vital information cut so the central mystery remains unresolved, resulting in a flawed but potentially masterful film on DVD.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
5 June 2004 · David Haviland
90*

The critic finds the film extremely entertaining and the best in the series so far, with enough action, humour and suspense for adults and children. Cuarón's direction brings a darker tone and strong visuals, including exciting action sequences like a storm-lashed Quidditch match and a flight on a Hippogriff, though the story occasionally loses momentum.

Read the full review →
Digital Spy
6 July 2011 · Simon Reynolds
85*

The critic highlights how Alfonso Cuarón brought a darker tone and fresh energy to the series, with stronger visual storytelling, ingenuity and performances from the young leads. It received the strongest critical notices of the franchise and is positioned as a creative high point that shaped the direction of the later films.

Read the full review →
Paste
4 June 2024 · Ellen Johnson
85*

The critic calls Cuarón’s film the standout and best entry in the series, crediting its darker, more faithful Scottish aesthetic, concise pacing (especially the time-travel element), and accessible, technically coherent storytelling that works as a standalone stunner.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate