Most critics agree on where Haywire earns its keep: Gina Carano. The reviews praise her fight scenes almost without exception, noting that Soderbergh shoots them from a respectful distance, without wires or stunt doubles, and lets the raw sound of the blows do the work. Several also admire the lean approach, treating the film as an exercise in thriller technique rather than storytelling. The reservations cluster around everything between the fights. The plot is called thin, derivative or convoluted, and a number of critics find the film too cool for its own good, with Slant judging it aloof and inconsequential and Time Out finding the hi-def visuals flat and banal. The spread is wide: from strong approval at The AV Club and Collider to outright dismissal at The Times, which argues Soderbergh never taught Carano to act. Even admirers tend to wonder whether she can carry a role that asks for more than a kick.
A
The AV Club
19 January 2012 · A- · Scott Tobias
90
Soderbergh uses sophisticated trappings as a smokescreen for distilled lizard-brain entertainment built around Carano's athletic ass-kickings. The raw fight sounds and terse lead role make it bracing and satisfying action fare.
Read the full review →I
IndieWire
19 January 2012 · B+ · James Rocchi
83
Soderbergh crafts a stylish, smart action vacation with sharp kicks and effective genre play around Carano's breakout. The film balances visual flair and physical thrills without overreaching.
Read the full review →S
Screen Daily
7 November 2011 · festival review
80*
Soderbergh delivers a fun, uber-stylish action-thriller with kinetic fight scenes and a dazzling physical performance from Gina Carano that proves seductive despite a thin plot.
Read the full review →T
Total Film
6 January 2012 · Kevin Harley
80*
Gina Carano ably leads Steven Soderbergh’s revenge actioner with slick, muscular tag-team fights that deliver an agile drop-kick to doubts. The pared-back purity focuses on physicality and jazzy montage over story depth, proving effective with tough panache despite some limitations in range and emotion.
Read the full review →E
Empire
10 January 2012 · Simon Crook
75*
Soderbergh delivers a fresh, muscular payback movie with mischievous indie spirit, casting MMA fighter Gina Carano as a convincing action lead surrounded by star power. The film is great fun with well-choreographed, realistic fights and Soderbergh's signature style, though it stays a little too cool for maximum excitement.
Read the full review →Soderbergh's formula action-thriller is perfectly enjoyable thanks to Carano's arresting athletic presence and well-staged fights viewed from a respectful distance. Minor complaints about underenergized sections and lack of flashy payoffs do not detract from its appeal.
Read the full review →G
The Guardian
19 January 2012 · Peter Bradshaw
60*
Gina Carano is crackingly good in the fight scenes, reminiscent of action queen Cynthia Rothrock, but the film is let down by boring moody location work between the action set pieces.
Read the full review →S
Slant Magazine
14 January 2012 · ★★/4 · R. Kurt Osenlund
50
Soderbergh's latest emphasizes visceral, un-sugarcoated fights but ultimately feels aloof and inconsequential, like Contagion. Stylistic choices and a lack of urgency prevent it from becoming essential viewing despite the novel lead.
Read the full review →L
Little White Lies
19 January 2012 · 3/2/2 · Adam Woodward
40
Soderbergh assembles a strong ensemble for a stylish but surprisingly lacklustre and formulaic thriller. The fight sequences stand out as cool yet ultimately tiresome and gimmicky.
Read the full review →T
Time Out
17 January 2012 · Keith Uhlich
40*
Soderbergh's action trifle lacks thrill and excitement despite Carano's presence; the director's disinterest is evident and the hi-def visuals render everything flat and banal.
Read the full review →T
The Times
20 January 2012 · Kevin Maher
30*
The clever idea of casting real MMA champion Gina Carano is gut-punched into idiocy by Soderbergh, who fails to teach her to act; the plot is derivative and the film feels flat.
Read the full review →L
Los Angeles Times
20 January 2012 · Betsy Sharkey
The film is less a tightly plotted action thriller than an excuse to showcase Gina Carano's substantial fighting skills, which prove thoroughly entertaining and awe-inspiring. It falls short of Soderbergh's best work due to loose plotting and lack of tension.
Read the full review →H
The Hollywood Reporter
7 November 2011 · Todd McCarthy
Soderbergh delivers an engaging action lark centered on Gina Carano's convincing physical performance as a covert operative who dominates her male co-stars in realistic fight scenes. The film succeeds as pure, unpretentious mayhem with strong fight choreography and a capable lead.
Read the full review →N
The New Yorker
24 January 2012 · Richard Brody
Soderbergh delivers a film of great style that delights in movement and physical action, sharing the adrenaline thrill of danger through tense, electric images. It conveys substance about professionals and government subcontractors via its visual aesthetic.
Read the full review →N
The New York Times
20 January 2012 · A.O. Scott
The film is a cold and kinetic experiment in high-impact, low-concept genre filmmaking that prioritizes expertly choreographed action sequences over a preposterous plot. It showcases Gina Carano's debut effectively through its focus on physical confrontations.
Read the full review →V
Variety
7 November 2011 · festival review · Justin Chang
Soderbergh's action-filmmaking chops get a swift, vigorous workout in this lean, efficient exercise that pares down narrative in favor of pure thriller technique and Carano's athletic prowess. It is tossed off with sangfroid and dry humor, with fluid filmmaking as its main thrill.
Read the full review →C
Collider
19 January 2012 · A- · Matt Goldberg
90
The critic praises Soderbergh's thoughtful approach to the action genre by centering a skilled female fighter, highlighting how the film challenges perceptions of violence against women while delivering exciting, realistic fight scenes.
Read the full review →H
HeyUGuys
9 January 2012 · ★★★★ · Craig Skinner
80
The critic praises the film's stylish action sequences and Carano's physical performance, noting it's smart, stylish, and well-crafted with jaw-dropping set pieces. They highlight the fight choreography and subtle character moments.
Read the full review →N
NME
21 January 2012 · Owen Nicholls
75*
The review sees Haywire as a stylish, enjoyable diversion from Soderbergh with strong genre touches and a memorable lead. Gina Carano’s convincing physicality in the action sequences is highlighted as a standout element.
Read the full review →The critic finds Haywire an energetic action thriller that showcases Gina Carano's impressive fighting skills and physical presence, despite her limited acting experience. The film's plot serves mainly as a vehicle for exciting fight scenes and chases.
Read the full review →D
Den of Geek
14 January 2012 · ★★★ · Duncan Bowles
60
The critic finds Haywire disappointing as an action film due to its lack of structure, spectacle and emotional engagement. Gina Carano’s physical presence and fight scenes are singled out as the main source of appeal.
Read the full review →/
/Film
7 November 2011 · festival review · Germain Lussier
60*
The review notes the fight scenes are entertaining and realistic, praises Soderbergh's direction for subtlety, but points out Carano's acting limitations compared to the cast; it's refreshing but not pulse-pounding.
Read the full review →E
Eye for Film
18 January 2012 · Amber Wilkinson
40*
The critic finds the action strong thanks to Carano's physicality but criticizes the convoluted plot, pretentious flashbacks, and lack of emotional depth, calling it a brief kick for action fans but failing elsewhere.
Read the full review →P
Paste
19 January 2012 · 7.5 · Annlee Ellingson
The critic commends Soderbergh for crafting a realistic espionage thriller led by MMA fighter Gina Carano, noting the grounded action sequences without stunt doubles or wires, though questioning if Carano can handle more emotional roles.
Read the full review →Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate