Critics’ reviews

Henry V (1944)

9 reviews from 9 publications. Critics’ score 79: 8 positive, 1 mixed, 0 negative.

Back to our review of Henry V

79
Positive
8
Mixed
1
Negative
0

Most critics think well of Olivier’s Henry V, and the praise gathers around Olivier himself, as actor, producer and director. The reviews single out his command of the verse and of his cast, the Saint Crispin’s Day speech especially, and the Globe Theatre opening that widens into full cinema. The Agincourt battle is admired for its scale on a modest budget, William Walton’s score is mentioned warmly, and the supporting cast gets its due.

The reservations are about the look. The Times finds the vivid costumes and theatrical sets closer to the Land of Oz than to Agincourt, and the Guardian calls the battle all mud and no blood. Time Out, the only mixed review, finds the design artificial and the battle scenes uneven, and argues the film’s reputation as martial propaganda is overstated. The spread is narrow: the 1940s reviews are the warmest, the reissue notices a shade cooler, and nobody dislikes it.

Los Angeles Times
30 July 2006 · Susan King
90*

The critic describes Olivier’s 1944 production as the first successful Shakespeare film, calling it clever, engaging, and beautifully staged. Shot during World War II, it served as balm for war-weary Britons with its realistic approach and inspired Globe Theatre framing that transitions into full cinematic storytelling.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
15 June 1946 · John McCarten
90*

The critic hails the film as an almost perfect interpretation of Shakespearean drama on screen, praising Olivier's versatile work as actor, producer, and director. It features graceful pageantry, magnificent battle scenes at Agincourt rendered like a ballet, and strong supporting performances, especially Renée Asherson.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
18 June 1946 · Bosley Crowther
90*

The critic calls the film a stunningly brilliant and intriguing screen spectacle rich in theatrical invention, heroic imagery, and regard for Elizabethan stage conventions. Olivier's majestic performance as Henry sets a standard for excellence, with thrilling battle scenes and eloquent verse delivery.

Read the full review →
Evening Standard
10 April 2012
80*

The film is a bit of a hotchpotch of stylistic devices but Olivier's terrific performance and William Walton's sweeping score still render it one of the best Shakespeare films ever made. There's a great supporting cast, too.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
10 August 2007
70*

Olivier created a bold, clear reading of Shakespeare's play and an exhilarating piece of wartime propaganda. The Agincourt battle looks like a medieval tournament with colourful pennants and flags, all mud and no blood.

Read the full review →
The Times
12 August 2007 · Peter Whittle
70*

The digitally remastered reissue for Olivier's centenary shows vivid costumes and theatrical sets that occasionally conjure up the Land of Oz rather than Agincourt. The stirringly patriotic moments still work magic with Olivier utterly in command of the text and actors.

Read the full review →
Time Out
7 August 2007 · ★★★ · Wally Hammond
60

Olivier’s 1944 Shakespeare adaptation holds an indelible place in British cinema as a colourful wartime morale-booster with Hollywood-style glitz, though its martial propaganda reputation is misleading. The critic praises Olivier’s commanding performance and the film’s audacious sub-Brechtian adaptation that reveals the heart of the text, while noting the artificial design and uneven battle scenes.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
28 July 2007 · Scott Macdonald
85*

Olivier's 1944 adaptation is a lavish, stylish Technicolor take on Shakespeare's history play that uses theatrical devices cleverly and delivers an epic battle on a modest budget. The critic praises Olivier's authoritative performance as Henry and the film's witty, inventive storytelling while noting its wartime context and cuts to the text.

Read the full review →
Paste
22 September 2019 · Kenneth Lowe
75*

The review positions Olivier's Henry V as calculated wartime propaganda that also succeeds as a lavish, faithful Shakespeare adaptation and the first major screen version. It singles out the elaborate Technicolor production design, historical recreation of Agincourt, and especially Olivier's commanding delivery of the Saint Crispin's Day speech for praise.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate