Critics’ reviews

How Green Was My Valley (1941)

9 reviews from 9 publications. Critics’ score 80: 8 positive, 1 mixed, 0 negative.

Back to our review of How Green Was My Valley

80
Positive
8
Mixed
1
Negative
0

Most critics warm to it. Eight of the nine reviews are positive and none is negative, and the praise clusters on John Ford’s direction: his affection for the Welsh valley and its people, and his handling of working-class solidarity. The cast draws consistent notice, with Donald Crisp and the young Roddy McDowall named again and again. Several writers also single out the photography, from the low-angle compositions to the deep-focus interiors, and the more recent reviews read the film as a memory piece about childhood and a community that is disappearing as it is remembered.

The reservations are about authenticity. The Guardian notes the Hollywood-built village standing in for Wales, and Time Out finds the backlot and the accents hard to believe in, even while the story still moves. Slant calls it more melodramatic and nostalgic than The Grapes of Wrath, and Empire, the one mixed review, admires the photography and the child’s-eye framing but is cooler on the whole. The spread is narrow: nobody dislikes it.

Radio Times
★★★★★ · Tony Sloman
100

The critic praises this magnificent Oscar-winning family saga for its power to move and entertain, highlighting John Ford's loving direction of life in the Welsh valleys and the sincerity of the cast.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
29 October 1941 · Bosley Crowther
90*

The critic hails the film as a poetic and dignified achievement rich in visual beauty and human character, singling out its stunning pictorial mastery and superb performances, especially by young Roddy McDowall and Donald Crisp.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
8 May 2023 · Scout Tafoya
85*

The critic praises Ford's rapturous, Proustian account of childhood memory and community in a Welsh mining valley, highlighting its blend of clarity and dreaminess alongside striking sequences of loss and labor solidarity.

Read the full review →
Variety
28 October 1941 · Abel Green
85*

The critic calls it one of the year's better films, a warm human story with impressive performances and expert craftsmanship that will appeal broadly, highlighting inspired casting including Donald Crisp, Sara Allgood, and young Roddy McDowall.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
12 November 2015 · Richard Brody
80*

The critic notes the film's resemblance to Citizen Kane as a flashback saga of lost idyll and community eroded by industry, praising Ford's nuanced depiction of working-class solidarity through expressionistic tableaux and sound.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
12 February 2013 · Eric Henderson
75*

The critic notes the film's origins as a scaled-back production and its engagement with themes of proletarian rights, unionization, and human dignity amid family and community strife in a Welsh mining town. Ford's social conscience and low-angle camerawork are singled out for praise, though the film is seen as more overtly melodramatic and nostalgic than The Grapes of Wrath.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
· Clyde Jeavons
70*

The critic describes the restored 1941 Oscar-winner as still gripping and moving in its account of life in a Welsh mining community. They single out the elaborate Hollywood-built set representing turn-of-the-century Wales as a notable example of the film's 'Hollywoodisation'.

Read the full review →
Time Out
11 September 2012 · TM
70*

The backlot village and accents hinder belief in this nostalgic Welsh tale, but it remains an elegant and eloquent film whose story of a traditional way of life breaking up resonates more strongly when viewed through an Irish lens.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · David Parkinson
65*

The critic praises Ford's innovative approach to adapting the novel through the young protagonist's perspective to critique resistance to social progress, along with strong performances and exceptional deep-focus photography. However, the review questions whether the film truly deserved its Oscars given stronger competition that year.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate