Critics’ reviews

I Am a Fugitive from a Chain Gang (1932)

7 reviews from 7 publications. Critics’ score 81: 7 positive, 0 mixed, 0 negative.

Back to our review of I Am a Fugitive from a Chain Gang

81
Positive
7
Mixed
0
Negative
0

All seven reviews are positive, and they agree on why. Paul Muni’s performance as the wrongly convicted man is praised across the board, described variously as harrowing, understated and riveting. The chain gang sequences draw equal attention: critics find the floggings, hard labour and misery convincing rather than staged, and the escapes are singled out as among the tensest of their era. Empire credits Mervyn LeRoy’s staging of the set-pieces, and several reviews note that the film’s anger at organised cruelty has not softened with age.

The spread is narrow, running from good to strong, and reservations are few. Time Out finds some of the social commentary heavy-handed. The two reviews written on release, from The New York Times and The New Yorker, are the coolest, treating it as honest, instructive melodrama rather than anything exceptional, while later critics are readier to rank it above Warner’s other social problem pictures of the period.

Slant Magazine
22 May 2005 · Jeremiah Kipp
90*

The film remains a gripping, uncompromising prison drama whose hard-edged anger has not dulled over time. The critic singles out the blunt, effective prison sequences and Muni's riveting performance as a man desperate for freedom.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
17 May 2005 · Noel Murray
90*

The film is a vivid social-problem picture that does not flinch from the grim realities of Southern chain gangs and connects them to broader issues of justice and aspiration. It features one of the most nerve-wracking escape sequences in movie history.

Read the full review →
Variety
31 December 1931 · Variety Staff
90*

The picture has guts, gripping with stark realism and packing lots of punch as a sympathetic cinematic transposition of the Robert E. Burns autobiography. Muni turns in a pip performance amid the story of dual escapes from the chain gang and the realistic finale.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 June 2006 · Kim Newman
85*

The critic calls it the most powerful of Warner Brothers’ early 1930s ‘social problem’ films, an indictment of organised cruelty that remains potent, hard-hitting melodrama. They single out Mervyn LeRoy’s staging of classic set-pieces and Paul Muni’s harrowing, understated performance.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
12 November 1932 · John C. Mosher
70*

The film delivers a substantial, deliberate and honest account of life in Southern prisons with no modern reform amenities, remaining ruthless, shocking and instructive. The prison scenes have a convincing ring, with stirring depictions of floggings, hard labor and misery, and the escapes are exciting.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
11 November 1932
70*

The film is a vehement attack on convict camps with most details from the source book, presented as a stirring melodrama without the usual concessions to popular appeal. Paul Muni gives a convincing and earnest performance as the central figure victimized by circumstances in the chain gang system.

Read the full review →
Time Out
10 September 2012 · NF
70*

Paul Muni delivers a brilliant performance as a man wrongly convicted and subjected to brutal chain gang conditions before escaping to build a new life, only to be recaptured. The film packs a punch with its harrowing details of prison life and downbeat ending, though some social commentary feels heavy-handed.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate