Critics’ reviews

In the Loop (2009)

15 reviews from 15 publications. Critics’ score 82: 7 positive, 0 mixed, 1 negative.

Back to our review of In the Loop

82
Positive
7
Mixed
0
Negative
1

Most critics greet In the Loop with enthusiasm, praising the speed and invention of its profane dialogue and the plausibility beneath its political farce. The writing draws the most consistent approval: insults, personal grudges and bureaucratic scrambling make the approach to war both funny and depressingly credible. Peter Capaldi’s Malcolm Tucker dominates the performance notices, with Tom Hollander and the ensemble also frequently praised for making the incompetence feel convincing rather than merely exaggerated.

The spread is wide, though the disagreement comes chiefly from a negative outlier rather than widespread uncertainty. The Wrap finds the satire stale, its officials stereotyped and its treatment of Americans reflexively dismissive, rejecting the originality most others admire. Elsewhere, reservations are milder: Eye for Film values the entertainment more than the deeper protest, while The Hollywood Reporter finds that the closeness to reality makes the laughter uncomfortable without treating that discomfort as a failure.

Time Out
14 April 2009 · ★★★★★ · Dave Calhoun
100

The critic praises the film as a sparkling big-screen adaptation of The Thick of It that retains its filthy humour and sharp satire on political ineptitude. They highlight the polished comic writing and the film's mix of screwball energy with precise observation across Whitehall and Washington settings.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
24 July 2009 · A- · Keith Phipps
90

The critic praises the film's profane, rapid-fire dialogue and chaotic style as capturing the essence of political maneuvering. The believable satire beneath the laughs, showing how personal grudges drive policy, is singled out.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
24 July 2009 · A.O. Scott
90*

The critic praises the film's sharp, fast-talking satire on modern statecraft and the petty power games of politicians and bureaucrats in Britain and the US gearing up for war. It singles out the character of Malcolm Tucker, played by Peter Capaldi, as the standout for his profane cynicism that borders on integrity.

Read the full review →
Empire
25 March 2009 · Nev Pierce
85*

The critic lauds the film's sharp, quotable satire on political incompetence and spin, calling it a timeless demolition of Whitehall and Washington that feels hilariously authentic. Special praise goes to the ensemble, particularly Peter Capaldi's foul-mouthed performance.

Read the full review →
Total Film
30 March 2009 · Jonathan Dean
85*

The critic finds the film a smart, outrageous exposé of politicians that is both hilarious and depressingly real, with rapid-fire insults and a timeless message about power. It singles out the script's barbed wit and documentary-style direction for making the satire land effectively.

Read the full review →
Screen Daily
20 January 2009 · festival review
80*

The review calls it a virtuoso script that fills corridors of power with schemers and ambition, expanded effectively from the TV series into a dark look at political ineptitude. It notes the relentless pace, inspired dialogue full of obscenities, and strong performances especially from Capaldi and Hollander.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
3 May 2009
80*

The critic calls the film a nonstop riot of fumbling politicians and praises its quick-paced, acerbic dialogue and indictment of war-mongering officials. The balancing of dozens of characters and deadpan performances are highlighted.

Read the full review →
Film Comment
1 July 2009 · Graham Fuller

The critic views the film as a sharp expansion of The Thick of It, highlighting its Lord of the Flies-like power dynamics among inept politicians and ruthless fixers. Tucker’s brimstone wit and the ensemble’s realpolitik manoeuvring are singled out as the film’s savage, comedic core.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
17 April 2009 · Peter Bradshaw

The critic calls it the sharpest, funniest film of the year, praising its fearless satirical assault on the Iraq war buildup through the lens of hapless middle-rank officials and spin doctors. He singles out the high-velocity, inventive insults and strong performances, especially Peter Capaldi as Malcolm Tucker and Tom Hollander as Simon Foster.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
23 January 2009 · festival review

The critic finds the satire funny but notes the laughs catch in the throat as events feel too close to reality. The performances, especially those of Peter Capaldi and Tom Hollander, are singled out for praise.

Read the full review →
The Wrap
23 July 2009 · Desson Thomson
30*

The critic views the film as a clichéd and stale satire that fails to effectively lampoon the Iraq War buildup, instead highlighting its reflexive disdain for Americans and lack of originality. He singles out the tiresome character stereotypes, such as foul-mouthed officials and petty politicians, as a key weakness.

Read the full review →
Collider
29 January 2010 · Brendan Bettinger

The critic praises the film's rapid-fire humor and sharp political satire, highlighting Peter Capaldi's standout performance as the foul-mouthed Malcolm Tucker and the strong ensemble cast. The screenplay's clever dialogue and character work are singled out as making it highly quotable and rewatchable despite the heavy subject matter.

Read the full review →
Digital Spy
12 April 2009 · Simon Reynolds

The critic calls it a brilliant, tack-sharp comedy that harnesses the genius of The Thick of It for the big screen. Capaldi’s foul-mouthed spin-doctor Tucker and Hollander’s bumbling minister are praised as the standout elements in a furious whirlwind of farce about political spin.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
30 April 2009 · Chris

The critic finds the film well-acted and brilliantly scripted as a television satire moved to the big screen, with endlessly inventive and quotable profane dialogue. They single out the cross-Atlantic cultural differences in swearing and the film's entertainment value over any deeper protest.

Read the full review →
NME
16 April 2009 · Owen Nicholls

The critic declares Iannucci a genius and the film a profundity-strewn comedy to rival Dr. Strangelove. Its biting, sweary satire of warmongering idiots and the standout performance of Capaldi’s Malcolm Tucker are highlighted as reasons it succeeds on the big screen.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate