Critics’ reviews

Inception (2010)

13 reviews from 13 publications. We need six from publications we count before we show a critics’ score; there are 5 so far.

Back to our review of Inception

5 of 6
Positive
4
Mixed
1
Negative
0
Time Out
13 July 2010 · ★★★★ · Dave Calhoun
80

The critic praises Nolan for creating an engaging, visually inventive blockbuster that mixes dream logic with action and ideas about the subconscious. They note it demands attention but fades quickly after viewing.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
15 July 2010 · Peter Bradshaw
70*

Nolan's film is a colossal digital artefact and virtual reality sci-fi thriller with brilliant architectural effects but a weirdly inert narrative. It features dazzling FX flourishes and technical brilliance, though the plot clogs and the story's drive stalls in the final act.

Read the full review →
Screen Daily
5 July 2010
50*

The review finds it delivers as an action thriller with impressive spectacle but falls short as psychological sci-fi, not mind-bending enough, relying on marketing and stars for success.

Read the full review →
Empire
5 July 2010 · Nev Pierce

The critic praises the film as a thrilling, emotionally engaging original that blends spectacular action, complex structure and strong performances, especially DiCaprio's, into something truly distinctive.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
16 July 2010 · Kenneth Turan

Inception is a tremendously exciting science-fiction thriller that is as disturbing as it sounds, with masterful direction and unforgettable set pieces. Nolan excels at creating stunts, effects, and emotional connections through strong casting.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
14 July 2010 · Nick Schager

An ambitious but ultimately unwieldy pseudo-heist film that prioritizes intricate, exposition-heavy rules of dream infiltration over emotional engagement or visceral thrills. It offers striking imagery and parallel-editing skill in the finale but suffers from hollow characters, derivative elements, and a lack of meaningful ideas.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
14 October 2010 · Kirk Honeycutt

Nolan has outdone himself with an original sci-fi concept that repackages familiar action elements across multiple dream levels for corporate espionage and idea-planting. The film excels visually and with its cast, especially DiCaprio, though heavy exposition and relentless pacing can exhaust viewers.

Read the full review →
The Independent
17 July 2010 · Jonathan Romney

The critic finds the film visually dazzling and ingenious in its dream-within-dream structure but ultimately overburdened, self-indulgent and lacking in genuine strangeness or emotional depth.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
16 July 2010 · Richard Brody

Inception is an exemplary meta-movie about how movies are made, constructed with coherent, hermetic rules like chess. DiCaprio is terrific in the lead, though the dialogue is limited and the film has the camp-seriousness of 1950s B-science fiction.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
15 July 2010 · A.O. Scott

The film is a visually arresting, noir-tinged caper packed with allusions to other movies but trades in crafty puzzles rather than profound mysteries. It passes quickly and pleasantly with amazing imagery like folding cities and gravity-defying chases.

Read the full review →
Collider
16 July 2010 · A · Matt Goldberg
95

The film is an honest blockbuster that demands concentration while raising complex ideas within a thrilling action framework. It is one of the best movies of the year and unlike anything seen before.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
15 July 2010 · Paul Griffiths
85*

The critic praises Nolan for delivering a high-concept sci-fi thriller with innovative set pieces and a clever climax, highlighting the strong cast and layered storytelling that values imagination and emotion.

Read the full review →
Den of Geek
7 July 2010 · 4 out of 5 · Ryan Lambie

The critic finds Inception a bold and original multiplex film that mixes sci-fi, heist and action genres with personal depth, praising its ambitious dream-world concept and strong cast while noting some pacing issues in the first act.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate