Critics’ reviews

Infinity Pool (2023)

27 reviews from 27 publications. Critics’ score 66: 12 positive, 5 mixed, 3 negative.

Back to our review of Infinity Pool

66
Positive
12
Mixed
5
Negative
3

Most critics find Infinity Pool a lurid, confidently made piece of body horror aimed at the very rich, and the praise settles almost entirely on Mia Goth, whose performance as the resort’s resident agent of chaos is singled out again and again as the reason to watch. Alexander Skarsgård is credited nearly as often for a cold, self-loathing turn, and several reviews admire the hallucinatory imagery and the sheer nerve of the sex and violence. The reservations cluster around what lies underneath: a recurring complaint is that the cloning premise promises more than the script delivers, that the satire of wealth and tourism stays at surface level, and that the shocks turn numbing by the final stretch. The spread is wide. The AV Club calls it brilliant; The Wrap says it squanders its premise on generic ideas about insecure masculinity, and The Skinny finds the shock value produces apathy rather than discomfort.

The AV Club
24 January 2023 · A- · Jordan Hoffman
90

Brandon Cronenberg expands on his father’s body-horror style in a brilliant, disturbing thriller that takes down wealth and privilege through unexpected, unnerving territory and self-destruction. It dives deep into violence and group deviance while questioning identity.

Read the full review →
Little White Lies
23 January 2023 · 3/4/4 · Hannah Strong
80

Cronenberg delivers a visually engrossing and gross slice of nightmare fuel heavy on vibes rather than plot, a grubby downer of a holiday movie that tackles dark tourism and desire with seductive, sickening style.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
25 January 2023 · Katie Walsh
80*

Brandon Cronenberg’s latest is a weird and wonderful identity crisis-as-body horror film that serves as a biting satire of wealth and colonial tourism. Mia Goth delivers a ferocious, fearless, and funny performance as the seductive and sadistic Gabi.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★★ · Patrick Cremona
80

Cronenberg crafts an uneasy offbeat atmosphere with kaleidoscopic visuals and body horror bursts, making for a fascinatingly unusual work that poses interesting questions about the darker side of the human psyche.

Read the full review →
Time Out
24 January 2023 · ★★★★ · Ed Gibbs
80

Cronenberg serves up a deliriously depraved satire of super-rich excess and tourists behaving badly, a twisted sci-fi-comedy-horror ride full of gore, orgies and hallucinogens that is damn-near unmissable and addictive.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
23 January 2023 · Brian Tallerico
75*

Cronenberg delivers a wildly surreal and compelling body horror film about privilege and morality that takes big swings even if not all land perfectly. The committed performances, especially Mia Goth's riveting turn, help make it confidently made and worth watching.

Read the full review →
Screen Daily
23 January 2023 · festival review
70*

The film is a singularly unnerving experience punctuated by outlandish and disquieting moments that compensate for an episodic and repetitive script, with Skarsgård's icy performance perfectly attuned to the chilly vision.

Read the full review →
Variety
22 January 2023 · festival review · Peter Debruge
70*

Cronenberg goes off the deep end in this deranged critique of Western decadence featuring grotesque imagery and a cautionary tale of runaway hedonism at a resort where the rich can literally get away with murder. Alexander Skarsgård and Mia Goth deliver courageous and cackling performances amid the brain-shattering nightmare logic.

Read the full review →
The Telegraph
23 March 2023
60*

The critic describes the film as a raunchy, provocative sci-fi shocker with a brilliant conceit involving cloning after a hit-and-run on a poverty-stricken island resort, but notes that the premise is left naggingly unfulfilled amid orgiastic and gore-soaked elements reminiscent of The White Lotus. It focuses on the wealthy tourists' descent into violence and the clone procedure's ramifications.

Read the full review →
Vulture
27 January 2023
60*

The third and best Cronenberg film to date offers extreme imagery and a phantasmagoric ode to staying too long at the party, but the woozy spectacles eventually become numbing. It portrays soulless jet-setters as walking dead.

Read the full review →
Sight and Sound
26 January 2023 · festival review
50*

The critic finds less than meets the eye in this hermetic if visually striking horror, with Skarsgård and Goth chewing scenery amid plenty of viscera but little depth beyond the premise of cloned punishment for wealthy tourists.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
27 January 2023
50*

Cronenberg fixates on freaking viewers out with lurid sci-fi provocation, trippy visuals, and bacchanalian revelry but neglects deeper substance, staying in the shallow end. It evokes other extreme films but lacks the clinical distance of his father’s work.

Read the full review →
IndieWire
22 January 2023 · festival review · Ryan Lattanzio
40*

Cronenberg’s explicit psychedelic thriller is cold and clammy despite fearlessly warped turns from Skarsgård and Goth. The hedonistic tourism story stays shallow.

Read the full review →
Empire
20 March 2023 · Sophie Butcher

The critic describes a slick, satirical, insane thrill-ride that dazzles with dark sci-fi conceits, black humour and visceral violence, answering what terrible things rich people would do without accountability. It highlights Mia Goth's genius, demented femme fatale performance as the main draw.

Read the full review →
Financial Times
23 March 2023 · ★★★★☆ · Leslie Felperin

The review positions the film as sophisticated, nihilistic sci-fi body horror comparable to David Cronenberg's best work, commending its exploration of wealth, repulsion, and moral murkiness through the leads' performances, especially Alexander Skarsgård's portrayal of cruelty and self-loathing. It calls the movie bracing and up there with classics like Dead Ringers.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
26 March 2023 · Peter Bradshaw

The critic highlights Mia Goth's live-wire, anarchic performance as the standout element driving Brandon Cronenberg's satirical thriller about wealthy tourists on a remote island resort who become entangled in cloning and doppelganger paranoia. It praises the film's stylish, visceral body-horror approach and black comedy while noting its nightmarish logic and appeal to fans of boundary-pushing cinema.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
26 January 2023 · festival review · David Rooney

The film is an ultraviolent satire of unchecked privilege at a luxury resort, essentially The White Lotus with gore and cloning, but it lacks substance beyond shock value. Skarsgård and Goth deliver committed performances amid the body horror and depravity.

Read the full review →
The Independent
23 March 2023 · Geoffrey Macnab

The critic finds the film luridly enjoyable and creepy, with sudden tonal shifts blending blood-churning moments, dark humour and thought-provoking satire on the wealthy. It praises the performances of Skarsgård and especially Goth as the provocative agent of mischief.

Read the full review →
The i Paper
23 March 2023 · Christina Newland

The review calls it depraved, sexually ambivalent and disturbing, with Hitchcock-on-acid weirdness, sly social commentary and mind-bending sequences targeting wealth and moral decay. It singles out Goth's unique, menacing and hypnotic performance as the standout.

Read the full review →
Total Film
17 March 2023 · Neil Smith

The review finds it stylish but ultimately shallow, praising fresh ways to disturb and nauseate via camera work and masks, plus strong committed performances from Skarsgård and Goth, while questioning if there is much more to it beyond hedonistic thrills and boundaries-testing scenes.

Read the full review →
Deadline
23 January 2023 · festival review · Damon Wise
80*

The film is Cronenberg’s most original and ambitious yet, a nightmarish fusion of influences that gets under the skin with its extreme cinema. It explores an artist’s quest to feel alive through perverse ideas about identity, autonomy, graphic violence and sex.

Read the full review →
Collider
22 January 2023 · B- · Ross Bonaime
70

The critic finds the film a mix of shocking imagery and uneven narrative, praising the abstract horror sequences and performances by Skarsgård and Goth but noting it doesn't fully explore its class themes.

Read the full review →
Consequence
27 January 2023 · festival review
70*

The critic describes the film as a wild, shocking, and perverse bloody mess that doubles down on hedonistic and transgressive elements, praising its exploration of the idle rich and colonial tourism wrapped in extreme imagery.

Read the full review →
NME
24 January 2023 · festival review · Lou Thomas
70*

The film is a riot of sex, murder and intoxication with appropriate sonic ferocity. It praises Mia Goth's chilling performance while noting it is not for the squeamish.

Read the full review →
Film Stories
12 May 2023 · Ryan Lambie
65*

The critic describes Infinity Pool as a deeply weird, often flawed film with imagery and ideas that linger. It begins as a wry comment on the corrupting power of wealth before descending into a trippy quagmire of excess, with some jarringly outlandish scenes threatening the tension, though strong performances from Skarsgård and Goth help bridge the halves.

Read the full review →
The Skinny
24 February 2023 · ★★ · Fernando García
40

Cronenberg's third film fails to deliver on its transgressive ambitions due to a weak script, resulting in shock value that induces apathy rather than discomfort.

Read the full review →
The Wrap
26 January 2023
30*

The film squanders a promising high-concept premise on generic themes of insecure masculinity and fails to explore its ideas meaningfully. Extreme sex and violence amount to little more than superficial, disappointing imagery for fans of the genre.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate