Critics’ reviews

Insidious: The Red Door (2023)

17 reviews from 17 publications. Critics’ score 50: 4 positive, 6 mixed, 6 negative.

Back to our review of Insidious: The Red Door

50
Positive
4
Mixed
6
Negative
6

The reviews split almost evenly, and the spread is wide: from a warm four stars to outright dismissal. Nearly everyone credits Patrick Wilson with a competent directorial debut, and most find something to like in the father-son relationship at the film’s centre, which several critics say gives the series a more human footing than it has had before. The praise stops there for half of them. The most common complaint is that the scares are recycled, leaning on the franchise’s familiar jump-scare rhythm without adding to it, and a number of critics find the storytelling choppy and the final act flat. NME is the clearest dissenter at the top, finding the college setting and dread-filled sequences give the formula fresh energy. At the other end, Deadline calls it a misstep with sloppy editing and little horror to speak of. The consensus is a debut that handles its family well and its ghosts poorly.

The i Paper
6 July 2023 · Christina Newland
75*

The review praises the film as a return to form that effectively grounds its scares in family trauma and the father-son relationship. It highlights the effective jump scares and grotesque visuals despite some visual flatness.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
7 July 2023 · Noel Murray
60*

The fifth installment relies too much on the same old tricks but is often genuinely terrifying, with several sequences that are intensely scary. It has a strong idea about confronting past traumas rather than blocking them out, even if it falls short of the original.

Read the full review →
Empire
7 July 2023 · Helen O'Hara
55*

The critic commends the strong character work and family dynamics under Patrick Wilson's direction but notes the scares feel unoriginal and the storytelling choppy. Overall it is seen as a competent but unremarkable directorial debut that will mainly appeal to franchise fans.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
7 July 2023 · C- · Leigh Monson
50

The review sees the film as a wrong-headed attempt that retreads franchise iconography without contributing anything new, treating generational trauma in a tired way. It notes competence in performances and some humor but finds the scares lacking and execution weak.

Read the full review →
The Independent
6 July 2023 · ★★/4 · Mark Kennedy
50

The critic finds the film fails to deliver a strong finale for the franchise, with an incoherent story reliant on jump scares and familiar elements. While noting Patrick Wilson's solid directorial debut, the review suggests most viewers would be better off letting the series rest.

Read the full review →
Variety
6 July 2023 · Owen Gleiberman
45*

The sequel brings back the original characters and gives the film a hint of a human center through the father-son dynamic, but the scares feel standard and arbitrary. Wilson does not do a bad job for a first-time director, yet the tropes have been worked to death.

Read the full review →
IndieWire
7 July 2023 · David Ehrlich
35*

The review calls the directorial debut a generic jump-scare machine that fights against the director's strengths as a creaky end to the stalled franchise. It criticizes the lack of fresh ideas or effective scares.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
7 July 2023 · Jason Zinoman
35*

The film is a grim, workmanlike effort that collapses into woo-woo nonsense, though Wilson demonstrates a grasp of the franchise's jump-scare technique. The prickly father-son relationship is placed at the center, but the movie fails to sustain its early promise.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
10 July 2023 · James Mottram
30*

The critic finds the film a limp, lackluster horror that fails to deliver on its promising setup, with a forgettable final act. Some performances and individual scenes are competent, but the whole is anti-climactic.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
10 July 2023 · Frank Scheck
30*

The review finds the film a desultory and repetitive entry that piles on superficial jump scares without impact. It notes some value in comic relief from a supporting character and a strong performance from one actor.

Read the full review →
NME
7 July 2023 · ★★★★ · Alex Flood
80

The critic finds the film a fun, effective horror entry that benefits from a college setting and family focus, praising its dread-filled sequences and Wilson's assured directorial debut. The campus atmosphere and nostalgic take on the characters' powers add fresh energy to the franchise formula.

Read the full review →
Collider
7 July 2023 · B- · Nate Richard
70

The film moves the story of the first two entries forward with the original cast and feels more human than prior installments, with effective character moments outweighing the scares for longtime fans.

Read the full review →
The Playlist
6 July 2023 · B- · Simon Thompson
70

The critic praises the film's confident direction by Patrick Wilson in his debut, its focus on character development and family dynamics, and effective scares without relying on cheap tricks. They note it serves as a satisfying conclusion to the Lambert family story while exploring personal elements.

Read the full review →
/Film
7 July 2023 · 6/10 · Chris Evangelista
60

The review highlights Wilson's solid directorial debut with effective building of tension and dread, particularly in scenes like the MRI machine, and notes the film's focus on family dynamics elevates it above typical sequels, though the script can feel repetitive.

Read the full review →
The Wrap
6 July 2023
40*

The sequel wearily fizzles despite some effective set-pieces and signature jump scares, becoming wearisome rapidly. It leaves a mild echo of the better earlier films despite Wilson's capable direction in his debut and a worthy message about embracing one's past.

Read the full review →
Deadline
6 July 2023 · Valerie Complex
30*

The film is an unfortunate misstep that offers little in the way of horror or entertainment. It drifts frustratingly slow between father and son storylines with sloppy editing and a lack of cohesiveness.

Read the full review →
Paste
7 July 2023 · 5.5 · Matt Donato

Wilson's directorial debut wavers between mediocre family drama and spooky elements without balance or harmony, resulting in a mediocre sequel that loses pace with its predecessors.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate