Insidious: The Red Door poster

Insidious: The Red Door

2023 · Directed by Patrick Wilson
1h 47mHorrorThriller15
54
Fi1m score
50
Critics · 16
Audience · not yet

Where to watch in the UK

Checked 10 September at 22:29. Prices and availability change; the service’s page is the last word.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Synopsis

Years after the events of *Insidious: Chapter 2*, Josh Lambert (Patrick Wilson) and his eldest son Dalton (Ty Simpkins) have had their memories of the Further wiped, and neither is the better for it. Josh, now separated from Renai (Rose Byrne), forgets appointments and loses his temper. Dalton leaves for college to study art, where his roommate Chris Winslow (Sinclair Daniel) has been assigned to his room by mistake and his tutor, Professor Armagan (Hiam Abbass), asks the class to paint what they remember. Dalton paints a red door. Back home, Josh goes for a brain scan. Wilson also directs, from a screenplay by Scott Teems and a story by Teems and Leigh Whannell, the writer of the original film.

Fi1m review

In a sentenceThe scariest thing in it is an MRI scan, which says something about the demons

Patrick Wilson’s first film as director takes the Lambert family seriously and takes its scares from the shelf. The father and son business is real and the MRI sequence is properly frightening; the rest is red doors, red light and a violin.

Patrick Wilson has played Josh Lambert since the first Insidious in 2010, and for his first film as director he has gone back to the family that made his name in horror. Scott Teems’s script, from a story by Teems and Leigh Whannell, picks up years after Insidious: Chapter 2, with Josh and his son Dalton (Ty Simpkins) having had every memory of that house and the place beyond it hypnotised out of them. The idea is that forgetting has cost them. Josh is separated from Renai (Rose Byrne), fogged and short-tempered; Dalton is a sullen art student who cannot say why he paints what he paints. It is a sound idea for a fifth film, and the film means it. What it does not have is a new way to frighten anybody.

The family half is the better half. Wilson plays Josh as a man who keeps losing the thread of his own sentences, apologetic and irritable at once, and he lets Simpkins hold long stretches of screen without saying much. Their scenes in a car and in a dormitory corridor have the awkwardness of a father and son who have run out of things to say and know it. Byrne has three scenes and does more with the second of them than the script asks. Andrew Astor and Juliana Davies return as the other Lambert children and are given a funeral and little else.

There is one sequence that works on us entirely, and it is the one most people will tell you about. Josh goes for an MRI to find out what is wrong with his head, and Autumn Eakin shoots it from inside the tube, the ceiling a few inches from his nose, the light flat and white and no room to turn. Joseph Bishara’s score, which spends most of the film shrieking, goes almost silent. We held our breath for the whole of it, and when the scare came we flinched, which is rarer than a jump and harder to earn. Wilson knows how long to hold a shot before something moves in the corner of it.

The trouble is that he has learned only that. Every other scare in the film is a variation on the same move: a dim room, a figure in the background that was not there a moment ago, a silence broken by Bishara’s strings. Adam Reamer’s production design gives the Further the look it has always had, the family house and now a college dormitory redressed in soot and lit by a single bulb, with the red door at the end of a corridor. It is well built and we have seen it. Bishara, who also plays the Lipstick Demon, does a good deal of standing in doorways with his face lit red, and by the fourth time we had stopped being alarmed and started counting.

Michel Aller and Derek Ambrosi cut the film as two strands, father in one town and son in another, and the strands never quite pull on each other. A scene of Dalton in class with Professor Armagan (Hiam Abbass, watchful and underused) gives way to Josh alone at home, then back, and each cut lets the air out of what came before. Sinclair Daniel, as Dalton’s accidental roommate Chris Winslow, is the one performer who seems to know she is in a slightly silly film; she is funny and quick and the film brightens whenever she is on. Then it sends her away so the lights can go off again.

Against the series’ own standard the film sits in the middle. James Wan’s first Insidious was cheap, nasty and inventive, and it built its scares out of a house we came to know room by room. This one cares more about its family than any of the sequels and frightens less than all but the worst of them. Wilson directs actors well, which is not a surprise, and directs dread by the book, which is a disappointment. Lin Shaye’s Elise is billed and appears, and we will say nothing about how.

Most critics have landed where we have, split between those grateful for a horror film that cares about its family and those tired of the family’s furniture. We are somewhere between the two. If the Lamberts mean something to you, this is a considerate ending for them, and the MRI alone is worth a quiet evening. If they do not, it is 107 minutes of a red door opening and closing, and you already know what is behind it.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

50
Positive
4
Mixed
6
Negative
6

The reviews split almost evenly, and the spread is wide: from a warm four stars to outright dismissal. Nearly everyone credits Patrick Wilson with a competent directorial debut, and most find something to like in the father-son relationship at the film’s centre, which several critics say gives the series a more human footing than it has had before. The praise stops there for half of them. The most common complaint is that the scares are recycled, leaning on the franchise’s familiar jump-scare rhythm without adding to it, and a number of critics find the storytelling choppy and the final act flat. NME is the clearest dissenter at the top, finding the college setting and dread-filled sequences give the formula fresh energy. At the other end, Deadline calls it a misstep with sloppy editing and little horror to speak of. The consensus is a debut that handles its family well and its ghosts poorly.

The i Paper
6 July 2023 · Christina Newland
75*

The review praises the film as a return to form that effectively grounds its scares in family trauma and the father-son relationship. It highlights the effective jump scares and grotesque visuals despite some visual flatness.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
7 July 2023 · Noel Murray
60*

The fifth installment relies too much on the same old tricks but is often genuinely terrifying, with several sequences that are intensely scary. It has a strong idea about confronting past traumas rather than blocking them out, even if it falls short of the original.

Read the full review →
Empire
7 July 2023 · Helen O'Hara
55*

The critic commends the strong character work and family dynamics under Patrick Wilson's direction but notes the scares feel unoriginal and the storytelling choppy. Overall it is seen as a competent but unremarkable directorial debut that will mainly appeal to franchise fans.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
7 July 2023 · C- · Leigh Monson
50

The review sees the film as a wrong-headed attempt that retreads franchise iconography without contributing anything new, treating generational trauma in a tired way. It notes competence in performances and some humor but finds the scares lacking and execution weak.

Read the full review →
The Independent
6 July 2023 · ★★/4 · Mark Kennedy
50

The critic finds the film fails to deliver a strong finale for the franchise, with an incoherent story reliant on jump scares and familiar elements. While noting Patrick Wilson's solid directorial debut, the review suggests most viewers would be better off letting the series rest.

Read the full review →
Variety
6 July 2023 · Owen Gleiberman
45*

The sequel brings back the original characters and gives the film a hint of a human center through the father-son dynamic, but the scares feel standard and arbitrary. Wilson does not do a bad job for a first-time director, yet the tropes have been worked to death.

Read the full review →

Cast

Ty Simpkins
Dalton Lambert
Patrick Wilson
Josh Lambert
Sinclair Daniel
Chris Winslow
Hiam Abbass
Professor Armagan
Andrew Astor
Foster Lambert
David Call
Smash Face / Ben Burton
Peter Dager
Nick the Dick

Stills

If you liked this, try…

Insidious poster

Insidious

2010 · The one to revisit: the same house, fewer rooms, and every one of them frightening

The Babadook poster

The Babadook

2014 · A mother, a son and a picture book, with grief doing the haunting

Poltergeist poster

Poltergeist

1982 · The suburban family haunting this series has been quoting from the start

Dark Water poster

Dark Water

2002 · A parent, a child and a stain on the ceiling; Nakata makes damp terrifying

Lake Mungo poster

Lake Mungo

2008 · An Australian mock-documentary about a family after a loss; quiet, patient and unnerving