Critics’ reviews

Iron Man 2 (2010)

17 reviews from 17 publications. Critics’ score 53: 4 positive, 8 mixed, 5 negative.

Back to our review of Iron Man 2

53
Positive
4
Mixed
8
Negative
5

The reviews lean mixed, and almost everyone agrees on what keeps the film upright: Robert Downey Jr. Critics describe his Tony Stark as the reason to watch, with the banter between him and Gwyneth Paltrow singled out as the liveliest material on offer. Sam Rockwell and Mickey Rourke draw steady praise as the villains, and more than one reviewer names the Monaco Grand Prix sequence as the set piece that works without reservation.

The complaints cluster around the story. Most critics find it overstuffed: too many characters, too many plotlines, and a long stretch of exposition in the middle that exists to prepare for later films rather than to serve this one. Nearly every review calls it a drop from the first film. The spread is wide, from warm notices in The Guardian and at RogerEbert.com to an outright dismissal in The Hollywood Reporter, which finds nothing of the original left.

RogerEbert.com
5 May 2010 · ★★★/4 · Roger Ebert
75

The film is a polished but lesser sequel that succeeds mainly due to Robert Downey Jr.'s cocky, egotistical performance as Tony Stark, whose private health crisis adds tension. It delivers expected action and humor but lacks surprises and raises questions about the suits' physical toll on the wearer.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
29 April 2010 · Peter Bradshaw
75*

The critic praises Robert Downey Jr's performance as Tony Stark, noting he was born to play the role, and highlights the film's efficient spectacle and funny scenes, while acknowledging it is a cheerful sequel.

Read the full review →
Vulture
3 May 2010 · David Edelstein
70*

The critic describes the film as a stylized screwball comedy that succeeds in delivering entertainment value despite high expectations and a large budget. It avoids the trap of feeling like money was wasted on a subpar movie.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
3 May 2010 · Anthony Lane
65*

The movie celebrates a narcissistic hero without pandering to him, thanks to alert dialogue and strong comic performances from Downey, Paltrow, Rockwell, and others that turn flirtation and banter into highlights. It stalls under dead plot weight and unnecessary fights, leaving the hero (and viewer) bored despite the fun cast and direction.

Read the full review →
Screen Daily
27 April 2010 · festival review
60*

The critic notes the film's strong box-office potential due to cast and effects but points to a diluted, scattershot story from multiple storylines as a drawback; praises its glossy and noisy entertainment value.

Read the full review →
Time Out
27 April 2010 · ★★★ · Tom Huddleston
60

The review praises the strong opening with crackling dialogue and effects but criticizes the convoluted plot, too many characters, and weak finale that makes the film uneven overall.

Read the full review →
Variety
27 April 2010 · Brian Lowry
60*

It isn’t as much fun as the first film, with more familiar beats, uneven pacing, and a flabby midsection, but the final action delivers and Downey remains a charm. It feels more duty-bound and industrial than inspired, though it should still satisfy audiences as a money-making machine.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
6 May 2010 · Kenneth Turan
50*

As sequels go, this is acceptable but nothing more—a haphazard effort from talented people that benefits from Theroux's humor and strong supporting turns, especially Rourke's scenery-chewing villain and Rockwell's slimeball. Battles feel pro forma, some performers are underused, and it caters too much to the fanboy base at the expense of broader appeal.

Read the full review →
Little White Lies
30 April 2010 · 3/2/2 · Dan Brightmore
40

The critic finds the sequel a below-par follow-up lacking the original's surprise and burdened by setup for future films. They single out the lack of action and excessive exposition as major complaints.

Read the full review →
Empire
· Nick de Semlyen
30*

The critic calls it one of the breeziest blockbusters but finds it inessential, over-busy and mechanical overall, with little emotional heft despite strong charisma from the cast.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
5 May 2010 · Nick Schager
30*

The critic argues that the sequel suffers from subtraction by addition, piling on too many incidents, characters, and villains while skimping on meaningful action and emotional depth. The result is a shallow, unfocused spectacle lacking the moral center and inventiveness of the first film.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
14 October 2010 · Kirk Honeycutt
10*

The critic finds that everything enjoyable about the first film has vanished, replaced by noise, confusion, multiple villains, irrelevant stunts, and misguided storylines. The sequel relies too heavily on tedious CGI fights and lacks the focus and personality that made the original stand out.

Read the full review →
/Film
7 May 2010 · 7/10 · Russ Fischer
70

Downey Jr., Rockwell and Rourke bring strong personality that carries the film through its shaky story. The charismatic performances make up for narrative weaknesses in this summer tentpole.

Read the full review →
Den of Geek
27 April 2010 · ★★★ · Simon Brew
60

The critic says it can't quite recapture the first film's magic but is still a fun, ambitious blockbuster with strong action sequences like the Monaco GP one and solid performances from Downey Jr. and others. Praise for Favreau's handling of action.

Read the full review →
HeyUGuys
27 April 2010 · Gary Phillips
60*

The film just about pulls it off despite being strangely paced with long exposition and contrived storylines aimed at setting up The Avengers. Mickey Rourke and Sam Rockwell stand out as the best elements in an otherwise uneven sequel.

Read the full review →
NME
27 April 2010 · 6/10 · Stuart McGurk
60

The film puts too much emphasis on witty script and character development at the expense of action set pieces, leading to a sagging middle; it has a strong start and finale but feels overlong and like an ad for The Avengers.

Read the full review →
Digital Spy
28 April 2010 · Simon Reynolds
40*

It is flabby, unfocused and dull in places due to too much plot and set-up for Avengers, though entertaining in parts like the Monaco sequence and Johansson's action. Significant drop from the first film.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate