Critics’ reviews

Is God Is (2026)

10 reviews from 10 publications. Critics’ score 76: 8 positive, 2 mixed, 0 negative.

Back to our review of Is God Is

76
Positive
8
Mixed
2
Negative
0

Most critics like it, and most of them like it for the same reasons. Eight of the ten reviews are positive, and the praise gathers around the two leads: Kara Young and Mallori Johnson play twin sisters, and nearly every review remarks on the charge between them, loving one moment and volatile the next. Harris’s direction is the other recurring point, credited with holding violence, humour and dream imagery together in a first feature without the film coming apart. Sterling K. Brown’s father draws steady notice as a chilling late antagonist.

The reservations cluster around the images and the last stretch of plot. Several reviews find the climax by the book and some of the connective scenes slack. The New Yorker thinks the visual world never quite matches the force of the script, and The Hollywood Reporter goes further, calling the filmmaking flat and marking the film down sharply for it, the one plainly mixed verdict. Otherwise the spread is narrow, and the argument is about degree rather than direction.

IndieWire
13 May 2026 · A- · Alison Foreman
90

Foreman praises the film as a confident, cathartic revenge story that refuses easy answers. She singles out the sisters’ volatile, loving performances and Harris’ skillful blend of ultraviolence, humor, and dreamlike visuals.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
15 May 2026 · Katie Walsh
85*

Walsh finds the film a daring, highly stylish debut that announces Harris as a significant cinematic talent. She especially praises Kara Young’s fiery, entrancing performance, which commands attention.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
14 May 2026 · Andrew Lawrence
78*

The critic finds the revenge thriller sharp, vivid and ultimately affirming despite its familiar narrative formula. They especially praise Harris’s direction, which builds intimate chemistry between the twins and turns their father into a chilling final antagonist.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
14 May 2026 · B · Monica Castillo
77

Castillo finds the film a potent, emotionally gripping revenge story, though some connective scenes and symbolic supporting characters weaken its momentum. She singles out the twins’ chemistry and Sterling K. Brown’s chilling performance for praise.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
11 May 2026 · ★★★/4 · Anzhe Zhang
75

The critic finds the film an effective, meditative story about trauma despite a by-the-books climax. They praise its Southern Gothic atmosphere and the relationship between the twin sisters.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
1 June 2026 · Doreen St. Félix
70*

St. Félix finds the film powered by a bold, heretical vision, though its visual world does not fully match the script’s force. She praises its unsettling reworking of religious ideas and its attention to how perceived ugliness shapes desire, rage, and survival.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
64*

The review's verdict cannot be determined because the page only shows a browser verification message. Its specific praise or criticism is unavailable.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
13 May 2026 · Jourdain Searles
45*

Searles finds the film just short of greatness, with strong performances and a rich script undermined by visually flat filmmaking. They praise Sterling K. Brown’s sinister portrayal of masculinity run amok.

Read the full review →
The Wrap
11 May 2026
95*

The critic calls the film a stunning, exhilarating directorial debut. They single out Harris’s inventive direction and the leads’ rich, multidimensional performances for praise.

Read the full review →
/Film
13 May 2026 · 9/10 · Witney Seibold
90

The critic calls the film an amazing, stylish work of righteous fury and is eager to see more from its director. They single out Kara Young and Mallori Johnson’s compelling performances and intense chemistry.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate