
The consensus is strongly positive, with most critics praising It Follows for making a simple pursuing menace frightening through patient staging rather than cheap shocks. David Robert Mitchell’s control of space and pacing draws repeated praise, alongside the atmospheric photography and electronic score. The reviews also value the young characters’ convincing friendships, with Maika Monroe singled out for making fear sympathetic and immediate. Many find the sexual curse an effective way of exploring anxieties about youth, sex and mortality.
The differences concern how fully those ideas hold together, rather than whether the film works. Slant Magazine admires the visuals and score but questions the sexual politics and finds the metaphor muddled. The Playlist praises the atmosphere while finding the rules unclear and the scares less forceful than hoped. These are qualified endorsements within a broadly enthusiastic response; the chief reservation is that the sustained dread can be more persuasive than its explanation.
T
Time Out
13 February 2015 · ★★★★★ · Tom Huddleston
100
This is the most unexpected and downright unnerving fright flick in years, which riffs smartly on the classics while adding something ineffable all of its own. It offers an authentically frightening experience with folklorish simplicity and a smart STD metaphor.
Read the full review →T
Total Film
23 February 2015 · Matt Glasby
90*
The critic highlights the film's roots in the director's nightmares and its knowing nods to classic horror while capturing the feel of being young and afraid. It is called one of the most fearsomely original chillers of recent times, with a central conceit that serves as a subtle metaphor for teenage angst and relentless, nameless dread.
Read the full review →E
Empire
22 January 2015 · Kim Newman
85*
The critic praises the film's simple but effective central premise of an implacable pursuing entity passed on like a curse, along with its serious undertones and the strong portrayal of the young friends' relationships. It is described as a first-rate horror movie that adds a new monster to the pantheon while maintaining a meaningful subtext without undercutting the spookiness.
Read the full review →F
Film Comment
12 March 2015 · Jonathan Romney
85*
The critic praises the film's simple yet ingenious premise of a sexually transmitted curse embodied by an implacable pursuer, blending old-fashioned horror with subtle, personal observations on youth, suburbia, and mortality. They single out the emotionally engaging performances, particularly Maika Monroe as the sympathetic lead and the tender dynamic with her admirer Paul, alongside atmospheric cinematography and score.
Read the full review →L
Little White Lies
26 February 2015 · 4/4/4 · Anton Bitel
80
A petrifying and refreshingly original horror movie from an American name-to-watch. It is a mature, character-based film where waiting itself is scary.
Read the full review →L
Los Angeles Times
12 March 2015 · Michael Rechtshaffen
80*
The film delivers impressively fresh, smart and relentlessly chilling horror by opting for originality over cheap jolts. Convincing performances by relatable young characters and an unsettling electronic score enhance the nerve-jangling dread.
Read the full review →This rough-edged but pleasingly creepy American indie puts suburban teens at risk from a seemingly inescapable presence. It is more about goosebumps than gore, with an unsettling, slow-moving, shape-changing monster that sticks to its victims.
Read the full review →S
Sight and Sound
27 February 2015 · Kim Newman
80*
The critic praises David Robert Mitchell's imaginative young-adult twist on horror's implacable-pursuit mode. It puts rare emphasis on virtue and solidarity among the teens facing the threat.
Read the full review →S
Slant Magazine
9 March 2015 · ★★★/4 · Ed Gonzalez
75
The critic calls the film visionary but faults it for undigested ideas and dubious sexual politics, noting the strong visuals and Carpenter-like style while criticizing the metaphor and resolution. They single out the disarming delineation of slow-growing madness and the synth score for praise amid complaints about the catch-all metaphor.
Read the full review →N
The New Yorker
12 March 2015 · Anthony Lane
70*
Mitchell uses Detroit's contrasts to depict horror worming its way into placid life after a sexual encounter passes on a curse. The narrative rhythms blend frights with anomie among bored teens, making violent extinction feel ordinary.
Read the full review →G
The Guardian
26 February 2015 · Peter Bradshaw
The critic calls the film a modern classic of fear that taps into primal anxieties about sex and death with disturbing effectiveness. He singles out the director's sensational setpieces of suspense and the way it evokes a bland suburban world turned alien and menacing.
Read the full review →H
The Hollywood Reporter
17 May 2014 · festival review · David Rooney
The critic praises the film's creepy, suspenseful atmosphere and skillful manipulation of tension in this lo-fi horror, noting its earnest tone and effective use of genre tropes without winking. They single out the assured direction and genuinely unnerving quality despite some lack of originality in characters.
Read the full review →N
The New York Times
13 March 2015 · Critic's Pick · Stephen Holden
The critic praises the film's cool, controlled direction and its incarnation of paranoia through a shape-shifting menace. Everyday teenagers and moody atmosphere stand out as elements that distinguish it from slick Hollywood horror.
Read the full review →T
The Times
27 February 2015 · Wendy Ide
The critic praises the film for being made with love and infusing familiar horror tropes with fresh influences and atmosphere rather than cheap shocks. She highlights the director's skillful use of space, both temporal and within the frame, to build creeping menace.
Read the full review →D
Den of Geek
19 February 2015 · ★★★★★ · David Crow
100
The critic hails It Follows as one of the best horror movies in years for its intangible, relentless dread that makes death feel immediate and personal to young characters. They single out the film's personification of primal terror through an unstoppable entity and Maika Monroe's sympathetic performance as the terrified protagonist.
Read the full review →C
Collider
11 November 2014 · A · Tommy Cook
95
The film is a remarkable deconstruction of the teen slasher genre and a powerful allegory for fears of sexual disease, aging, and mortality. It creates an unavoidable sense of dread through its focus on inevitability rather than a conventional monster confrontation, while remaining surprisingly non-nihilistic thanks to the support of the protagonist's friends.
Read the full review →/
/Film
13 March 2015 · 9/10 · Germain Lussier
90
The critic calls it one of the scariest horror films in years thanks to its simple, relentless walking-entity conceit that creates paralyzing real-life dread without jump scares or effects. They praise the performances (especially Maika Monroe conveying fear) and the John Carpenter-influenced score.
Read the full review →The critic calls the film an undeniable triumph of mood and an ambitious effort at reinventing horror by eschewing the genre’s common tricks. They single out the long shots that build stomach-dropping suspense without relying on jump scares.
Read the full review →E
Eye for Film
11 October 2014 · Owen Van Spall
80*
The review highlights the superb execution of the visual style with wide shots that force constant background scanning, the gripping mythology, and convincing teen performances, resulting in one of the most impressive tension-builders in years. It notes the dreamy teen-movie quality alongside the horror.
Read the full review →The critic describes It Follows as a fresh and scary low-budget horror film centered on the world's worst STD-like curse. They single out the smart script that builds tension effectively without relying on gratuitous gore.
Read the full review →P
The Playlist
18 May 2014 · B · The Playlist Staff
77
The review appreciates the arthouse sensibility fused with genre horror, dreamy photography, and atmospheric score but finds the rules diffuse and the film softer on outright scares than hoped, working better as mood and allusion than pure horror.
Read the full review →Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate