Critics’ reviews

Jane Eyre (2011)

14 reviews from 14 publications. Critics’ score 66: 7 positive, 6 mixed, 1 negative.

Back to our review of Jane Eyre

66
Positive
7
Mixed
6
Negative
1

The reviews lean favourable, with substantial reservations about how much feeling survives the adaptation’s restraint. Praise centres on Mia Wasikowska’s quietly forceful Jane, while Michael Fassbender’s Rochester and the pair’s verbal sparring also win approval. Even less persuaded critics admire the performances and visual craft. Subdued lighting, atmospheric photography and carefully composed images give the gothic setting a presence that the reviews repeatedly recognise.

The disagreement is chiefly over whether that restraint strengthens the romance or drains it. The New Yorker finds the austerity emotionally powerful; The AV Club finds the film respectful but lacking passion and danger. Empire takes a different view, finding the romance overripe while still admiring Wasikowska. Reservations elsewhere concern compression, episodic storytelling, Jane’s limited inner life and a climax that fails to gather force. The spread is fairly wide: shared respect for the acting and atmosphere does not produce agreement about the film’s emotional effect.

The New Yorker
6 March 2011 · David Denby
80*

Denby finds the adaptation austere but emotionally powerful, capturing the novel’s elemental passions. He praises Mia Wasikowska’s quietly confident Jane and the subdued lighting that heightens the gothic atmosphere.

Read the full review →
Evening Standard
10 April 2012
75*

The critic finds the adaptation highly recommendable and praises its restrained style, though the climactic scenes fail to build in intensity. Mia Wasikowska is singled out for embodying Jane as both a distinct character and an archetypal figure.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
7 March 2011 · ★★★/4 · Bill Weber
75

Weber finds the adaptation rewarding but constrained by the challenge of compressing the novel into a feature-length film. He praises Mia Wasikowska and Michael Fassbender for bringing emotional depth to Jane and Rochester’s romance.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
11 March 2011 · Kenneth Turan
70*

Turan finds Fukunaga’s adaptation compelling, though Jane’s restricted interior life limits the film somewhat. He especially praises Fassbender’s charismatic Rochester and the lively sparring between Rochester and Jane.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
3 March 2011 · Todd McCarthy
70*

The critic finds this a smartly handled, low-key adaptation, with young stars anchoring a tough-minded story. He particularly praises Mia Wasikowska’s performance and the film’s focused visual compositions, while noting that Jane’s religious development is missing.

Read the full review →
Screen Daily
8 March 2011 · Brent Simon
64*

The review text is unavailable, so its verdict cannot be determined. No specific praise or complaint is visible in the accessible page text.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
11 March 2011
64*

The URL identifies a review of the specified film, but the page did not load. Its verdict and any specific praise or complaint cannot be verified.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
10 March 2011 · C+ · Tasha Robinson
63

Robinson finds the adaptation respectful but passion-free, with its gothic romance and sense of danger sanded away. She praises the vivid scenery and Sally Hawkins’s infuriating performance as Mrs. Reed.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
8 September 2011 · Peter Bradshaw
62*

Bradshaw finds the adaptation intelligent, beautifully crafted and well acted, but too restrained to fully ignite its central romance. He particularly praises the chemistry and carefully paced first encounters between Jane and Rochester.

Read the full review →
Total Film
30 August 2011 · ★★★ · Neil Smith
60

Smith finds the adaptation elegant and brooding, though its episodic structure weakens it. He praises Adriano Goldman’s atmospheric photography and Michael Fassbender’s compelling Rochester.

Read the full review →
Empire
30 August 2011 · Ian Nathan
45*

Nathan finds the film visually striking but ultimately let down by its overripe romance and underdeveloped climax. He praises Mia Wasikowska’s restrained, forceful portrayal of Jane.

Read the full review →
Variety
4 March 2011 · Justin Chang
40*

Chang finds the adaptation visually striking and well acted, but too restrained and emotionally uninvolving to become especially vital. He praises Mia Wasikowska and Michael Fassbender’s performances, while faulting the film’s late revelations and restless visuals for failing to deepen Jane’s inner life.

Read the full review →
Collider
11 March 2011 · B+ · Matt Goldberg
83

Goldberg praises the film as a confident, haunting gothic romance, though he finds its early framing and childhood sections slow to find their footing. He singles out Wasikowska and Fassbender’s performances, along with the cinematography, score, and costumes, for praise.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
9 September 2011 · David Graham
75*

Graham finds the adaptation a thoroughly well-made, invigorating film, despite omissions and casting choices that do not fully honor the novel. He especially praises its ravishing Gothic visuals and Wasikowska’s emotionally nuanced performance.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate