Critics’ reviews

Jaws: The Revenge (1987)

14 reviews from 14 publications. Critics’ score 30: 1 positive, 2 mixed, 11 negative.

Back to our review of Jaws: The Revenge

30
Positive
1
Mixed
2
Negative
11

Most critics dismiss Jaws: The Revenge as a poorly executed sequel whose shark vendetta premise produces more disbelief than suspense. Eleven of the fourteen reviews are negative, with complaints centred on implausible plotting, unconvincing effects and a shortage of effective scares. The limited praise clusters around the cast, particularly Michael Caine, whose charm gives several critics something to enjoy. Lorraine Gary earns some support too, though the assessments of her performance are divided.

The disagreement is chiefly over whether the absurdity makes the film entertaining. Collider supplies the sole positive assessment, embracing the shark’s behaviour as that of a slasher villain and treating the excess as part of the fun. Paste finds some similar pleasures without calling it good. That creates a wide spread of scores, but little uncertainty about the prevailing view: most critics find the pacing slack, the action confused and the reliance on the original film wearying.

Little White Lies
9 July 2017 · Padraig Cotter
50*

The critic finds the film resoundingly mediocre with some redeeming qualities in the cast and a few effective sequences, despite its rushed production and silly plot. They single out the performances, particularly Lorraine Gary and Michael Caine, and the score for praise.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
18 July 1987 · Caryn James
35*

The critic finds it a color-by-numbers version of the original lacking intensity, with too much reverence for the first film and predictable action focused on family versus shark rather than quirky characters.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
3.1/10 · John Ferguson
31

The review calls it a preposterous fourth entry with a laughably inept plot about a personal vendetta by the shark. It notes silly elements like the shark attacking an aircraft and criticizes the neurotic lead performance while praising Michael Caine's cameo.

Read the full review →
Time Out
10 September 2012 · RS
30*

The critic describes the film as focusing on a vendetta against the family by the shark, with mostly waiting for attacks and some attempted symbolism that fails, leading to a messy ending. They single out the irritating child character and the overall silly, preposterous nature.

Read the full review →
Variety
31 December 1986 · ** · Variety Staff
30*

The review notes that pacing leaves a lot to be desired and the attack sequences resemble the view from inside a washing machine due to jagged cuts and noise. It praises some performances but criticizes insufficient development for key characters.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
20 July 1987 · Roger Ebert
20*

The critic calls it a bad, stupid and incompetent ripoff. He singles out the fake-looking shark models and the absurd plot devices, including a revenge-seeking shark and illogical scenes.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
29 July 2012 · Ted Pigeon
20*

The critic finds the film one of the least competent entries in the series, criticizing its half-hearted execution of the revenge premise and failure to deliver on tension or kills despite the title. He singles out its heavy, lazy reliance on nostalgia for the original Jaws through flashbacks and reused shots as especially misguided and emblematic of its emptiness.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
20 July 1987 · Sheila Benson
15*

The critic says it is dumb beyond belief, hollow, bloody and nonsensical, a vanity project that bottoms out the notion of the escapist summer movie. She singles out the unconvincing effects and performances, while noting a few credible turns amid the mess.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · Kim Newman
10*

The critic calls it significantly worse than the rest of the Jaws series and one of the most egregious belly-flops in recent cinema. They single out the bloodless, soppy and much-rewritten ending that makes no sense.

Read the full review →
Collider
4 April 2023 · Shawn Van Horn
80*

The critic celebrates the film as a fun, over-the-top 1980s slasher where the shark behaves like a vengeful human killer stalking the Brody family. They single out the absurd psychic connection between Ellen and the shark, along with the bonkers final death scene, as highlights that make it entertaining schlock.

Read the full review →
Paste
4 August 2023 · Trace Sauveur
50*

The critic ranks it third out of four Jaws films and calls it not a good film but one whose outlandish premise and bizarre turns make it memorable and more entertaining than a straight rehash. They single out the rushed production's manic glee, psychic shark connection, and Michael Caine's role as sources of its schlocky charm.

Read the full review →
Film Stories
2 October 2025 · ★★ · John Upton
40

The critic finds the film very bad overall but unintentionally amusing in parts, singling out Michael Caine's charming performance in the romance subplot as a highlight.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
9 August 2013 · Jennie Kermode
10*

The film is a damp squib bereft of energy that wastes its cast; the critic singles out the silly premise, lack of wit or sophistication, and incompetent ending for complaint.

Read the full review →
/Film
15 June 2022 · Jeremy Smith
10*

The critic calls it a deathly serious failure with a ridiculous premise and inept execution; singles out the bizarre TV-edit narration and exploding-shark ending for complaint.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate