Film review

Jaws: The Revenge

1987 · Directed by Joseph Sargent · 1h 29m · MPA PG-13

In a sentenceMichael Caine conducts a courtship while a shark takes the family name personally

AdventureThrillerHorror

Ellen Brody (Lorraine Gary) believes a shark is deliberately targeting her family. Michael Brody (Lance Guest) is among the Brodys facing the danger, while Hoagie Newcombe (Michael Caine) brings the possibility of romance into Ellen’s life. She wants to keep her family safe, but sees the animal’s behaviour as a vendetta rather than a series of attacks. Her growing involvement with Hoagie Newcombe offers a distraction from the water. The threat of the shark keeps bringing her attention back to the family she fears it has singled out.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Lorraine Gary and Michael Caine bring some warmth to a poor shark thriller that struggles to make either its revenge plot or its attacks convincing. Even Michael Small’s effective score can only do so much.

Jaws: The Revenge is a poor thriller whose cast occasionally makes the time pass pleasantly. Joseph Sargent directs a story in which a shark appears to have developed a grievance against the Brody family, and takes that grievance seriously. Ellen Brody’s fear for her family could hold our attention without much explanation of the animal. Michael De Guzman’s screenplay keeps asking us to accept the shark’s motive without supplying enough suspense to stop us questioning it.

Lorraine Gary plays Ellen Brody’s anxiety with conviction, and we remain sympathetic even when the film keeps returning to the same fear. Michael Caine, playing Hoagie Newcombe, supplies some welcome ease in the romance, and their scenes suggest how much better the film might work if it let its people relax. We were glad of that company, because the warmth between them offers relief from the repeated insistence that this shark means business. The performances make the family worth worrying about, which the attacks ought to have been able to use.

Instead, the film spends too long waiting for the next attack, then has trouble making the attack legible. Michael Brown’s editing breaks the violence into abrupt fragments, with noise doing much of the work that a clear view of the danger ought to do. We were bored during the waits, then irritated when the cutting made it difficult to follow the action. At 89 minutes, this should be a brisk piece of work, but its pauses do not make the water more threatening.

John McPherson’s photography leaves us too much opportunity to examine the creature’s artificial appearance. Once we start noticing a model, the characters’ distress becomes difficult to share. John J. Lloyd’s production design is a less obtrusive contribution, though the settings cannot make the thinly written family scenes interesting by themselves. The shark is meant to arrive as a threat, and too often we find ourselves assessing whether it looks capable of moving under its own power.

Michael Small’s score supplies a sense of threat that the images repeatedly fail to sustain. It is one of the few elements we would happily hear doing its job in a better version of this story. Joseph Sargent also returns to Jaws through flashbacks and reused images, inviting a comparison this film has no reason to encourage. Familiar footage interrupts the effort to care about Ellen Brody’s present predicament, when the film already struggles to keep our attention on her.

A revenge-seeking shark need not be a fatal premise; creature features have room for nonsense, provided somebody knows how to stage it. The problem is how solemnly this one proceeds, with too little surprise or humour to make its absurdity enjoyable. We agree with most critics about the failures, though the performances and music deserve more patience than the plot. Anyone coming for enjoyable nonsense should be warned that Michael Caine cannot keep the whole evening going by being agreeable.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

30
Positive
1
Mixed
2
Negative
11

Most critics dismiss Jaws: The Revenge as a poorly executed sequel whose shark vendetta premise produces more disbelief than suspense. Eleven of the fourteen reviews are negative, with complaints centred on implausible plotting, unconvincing effects and a shortage of effective scares. The limited praise clusters around the cast, particularly Michael Caine, whose charm gives several critics something to enjoy. Lorraine Gary earns some support too, though the assessments of her performance are divided.

The disagreement is chiefly over whether the absurdity makes the film entertaining. Collider supplies the sole positive assessment, embracing the shark’s behaviour as that of a slasher villain and treating the excess as part of the fun. Paste finds some similar pleasures without calling it good. That creates a wide spread of scores, but little uncertainty about the prevailing view: most critics find the pacing slack, the action confused and the reliance on the original film wearying.

Little White Lies
9 July 2017 · Padraig Cotter
50*

The critic finds the film resoundingly mediocre with some redeeming qualities in the cast and a few effective sequences, despite its rushed production and silly plot. They single out the performances, particularly Lorraine Gary and Michael Caine, and the score for praise.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
18 July 1987 · Caryn James
35*

The critic finds it a color-by-numbers version of the original lacking intensity, with too much reverence for the first film and predictable action focused on family versus shark rather than quirky characters.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
3.1/10 · John Ferguson
31

The review calls it a preposterous fourth entry with a laughably inept plot about a personal vendetta by the shark. It notes silly elements like the shark attacking an aircraft and criticizes the neurotic lead performance while praising Michael Caine's cameo.

Read the full review →
Time Out
10 September 2012 · RS
30*

The critic describes the film as focusing on a vendetta against the family by the shark, with mostly waiting for attacks and some attempted symbolism that fails, leading to a messy ending. They single out the irritating child character and the overall silly, preposterous nature.

Read the full review →
Variety
31 December 1986 · ** · Variety Staff
30*

The review notes that pacing leaves a lot to be desired and the attack sequences resemble the view from inside a washing machine due to jagged cuts and noise. It praises some performances but criticizes insufficient development for key characters.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
20 July 1987 · Roger Ebert
20*

The critic calls it a bad, stupid and incompetent ripoff. He singles out the fake-looking shark models and the absurd plot devices, including a revenge-seeking shark and illogical scenes.

Read the full review →

Cast

Stills

Awards

Golden Raspberry Award for Worst Actor, 1988

Nominated
Golden Raspberry Award for Worst Actor

Golden Raspberry Award for Worst Actress, 1988

Nominated
Golden Raspberry Award for Worst Actress

Golden Raspberry Award for Worst Director, 1988

Nominated
Golden Raspberry Award for Worst Director

Golden Raspberry Award for Worst Picture, 1988

Nominated
Golden Raspberry Award for Worst Picture

Golden Raspberry Award for Worst Screenplay, 1988

Nominated
Golden Raspberry Award for Worst Screenplay

Golden Raspberry Award for Worst Supporting Actor - Razzie Award, 1988

Nominated
Golden Raspberry Award for Worst Supporting Actor - Razzie Award

Golden Raspberry Award for Worst Visual Effects, 1988

Won
Golden Raspberry Award for Worst Visual Effects

If you liked this, try…

The Birds poster

The Birds

1963 · Ordinary places become frightening through patient staging and attacks that need no motive

Alligator poster

Alligator

1980 · Creature-feature nonsense handled with wit, clear action and affection for its human targets

Razorback poster

Razorback

1984 · A murderous boar gets the threatening landscape and visual conviction this shark lacks

The Host poster

The Host

2006 · Another endangered family, with enough personality to matter when the creature arrives

Crawl poster

Crawl

2019 · Family tensions and hungry alligators share a confined space, with considerably less waiting