Critics’ reviews

John Wick: Chapter 2 (2017)

26 reviews from 26 publications. Critics’ score 71: 20 positive, 2 mixed, 4 negative.

Back to our review of John Wick: Chapter 2

71
Positive
20
Mixed
2
Negative
4

Most critics like it, and a fair number think it better than the first film. The praise clusters on the action: the long-take gunfights, the staging of Stahelski’s set pieces, and the sense that the violence has been arranged with the care of choreography rather than thrown together. Reeves’ physical commitment to the part is admired across the board, and the expanded assassins’ underworld, with its codes and its rules, is generally counted a pleasure rather than a burden.

The spread is wide, from four-star notices down to a single star. Where reviewers pull back, it is over the same things: too much mythology, a long middle stretch that repeats itself, and a hero so indestructible that the danger drains away. The Guardian finds it video-gamey; the New York Times misses the first film’s lightness; the Times calls it tedious. The dissent sits largely with the broadsheets, while trade and genre outlets are warm.

Los Angeles Times
9 February 2017 · Justin Chang
90*

There is so much beautiful killing that the movie refuses to look away, yet it maintains a thrilling discipline in its long, choreographed action sequences. It is a connoisseur’s delight, a B-picture with an A-picture soul that showcases Reeves at his most watchable.

Read the full review →
Variety
6 February 2017 · Peter Debruge
90*

This elegantly choreographed sequel elevates brutal confrontations to a dazzling form of modern dance, succeeding on the elegance of its action rather than story. It improves on the original with no animals harmed and a reunion with Laurence Fishburne, achieving something akin to ballet in its violence.

Read the full review →
Empire
6 February 2017 · Chris Hewitt
85*

It expands the criminal underworld mythology and delivers stunning, stylish action sequences with sly humour, while Reeves fits the taciturn hitman role perfectly; a brutal, bruising bullet ballet of a sequel that builds on the original.

Read the full review →
Vulture
10 February 2017
85*

The film settles into a bleak, ritualized bloodbath that is crazy-violent yet beautiful, with breathtaking long-take choreography and a mythic, rule-bound underworld.

Read the full review →
IndieWire
6 February 2017 · B+ · Eric Kohn
83

The film improves on the original's cartoonish mayhem with confident style and exuberant sequences while sticking to the franchise's simple, satisfying rhythms.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
8 February 2017 · B+ · Ignatiy Vishnevetsky
83

The sequel ups the conceptual abstraction into a gothic, mythic journey through a stylized criminal underworld, with surreal action and visual gags taking precedence over pure momentum.

Read the full review →
Little White Lies
6 February 2017 · 4/4/3 · Matt Thrift
80

The critic finds the sequel less svelte than the original due to franchise expansion but praises Stahelski's assured handling of fluid, inventive action sequences and compositional flair.

Read the full review →
Time Out
6 February 2017 · ★★★★ · Tom Huddleston
80

The critic calls it a wildly enjoyable and ridiculous action flick that is a stupendously entertaining ride, highlighting the director's craft in staging punches and gunshots, the neon-lit style, and Keanu Reeves' cool performance.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
6 February 2017 · Justin Lowe
70*

The sequel ambitiously expands the underworld to a global scale with relentless stunts and Reeves' focused performance, though some plot developments dilute the central conflict.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
16 February 2017 · ★★★ · Peter Bradshaw
60

The sequel ramps up the action and carnage in an imaginatively designed way but is let down by excessive world-building and a video-gamey feel.

Read the full review →
The Telegraph
17 February 2017 · ★★★
60

Keanu Reeves's trigger-happy sequel gets the job done with solid action sequences.

Read the full review →
The Independent
15 February 2017 · ★★☆☆☆
30*

The film is even more stylised than the first, with slick visuals and fight sequences shot like destructive ballet, but the plotting is far-fetched and the hero's near-indestructibility removes any real sense of threat.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
10 February 2017 · Richard Brody
30*

The film is a mere technical exercise serving mainly as a trailer for its own making-of documentary, with no real stakes or emotional depth beyond the assassins' world. It offers a wilder ride than the first with more emphasis on the killer code and a paranoia-inducing twist, but remains a soulless display of violence.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
9 February 2017 · Jeannette Catsoulis
30*

The sequel is a more solemn and excessive affair than the original, with less of the first film's lightness and wit. It doubles the body count to showcase spectacular fight sequences in Roman locations, where the camera lingers on weaponry with more interest than on the human characters.

Read the full review →
The Times
17 February 2017 · ★ · Kevin Maher
20

This gore-splattered sequel has no attempt at a plot and is bully-bore cinema at its worst, tedious despite the violence.

Read the full review →
Den of Geek
6 February 2017 · 4 out of 5 · Don Kaye
90*

The critic calls it superior to the predecessor in almost every way, with gorgeous visuals, expanded surreal world-building and jaw-dropping action sequences. Singles out the extended neon-lit house-of-mirrors chase for particular visual praise.

Read the full review →
NME
15 February 2017 · 4 · Nick Levine
90*

The critic says the sequel offers similar thrills on a grander scale with dazzling action choreographed with gruesome elegance. Singles out the tense and unpredictable moments amid the killing sprees for praise.

Read the full review →
Paste
8 February 2017 · 8.4 · Jim Vorel
90*

The critic praises the film as a worthy sequel with spectacular, vital gunplay choreography that rivals The Raid films and highlights the colorful supporting characters and world-building.

Read the full review →
Digital Spy
7 February 2017 · Tom Eames
85*

The critic praises the film as even better than the first, with fantastic choreography and realistic carnage in the action scenes, plus a strong supporting cast and welcome humour. Singles out Keanu Reeves' committed physical performance for praise.

Read the full review →
Polygon
6 February 2017 · Julia Alexander
85*

The critic calls it a near-perfect follow-up that combines the original's ingredients with self-awareness about its ridiculousness, making the grander action sequences feel smarter and funnier while perfecting the gun fu style.

Read the full review →
HeyUGuys
8 February 2017 · ★★★★ · Stefan Pape
80

The critic praises the film's unrelenting high-octane action and the artistry of its choreographed fight sequences, particularly the street brawl with Common. Some repetitiveness and length in the middle are noted, but the stylish, visceral experience stands out overall.

Read the full review →
The Ringer
10 February 2017
80*

The critic describes the film as delivering brutal, beautiful violence that expands the hidden criminal world order and heightens the sense of danger and spontaneity in the action scenes.

Read the full review →
The Wrap
6 February 2017 · Robert Abele
80*

The critic praises the expertly choreographed action sequences and long takes of gun-fu, while noting that the sequel lacks the original's sense of surprise but still delivers thrilling mayhem.

Read the full review →
Collider
9 February 2017 · B · Matt Goldberg
77

The critic calls the film an escalation of the original that expands the assassin world with new rules and characters while delivering familiar stylish action, but notes the long fight scenes and lack of discomfort around the violence.

Read the full review →
The Playlist
6 February 2017 · B · Kevin Jagernauth
77

The critic calls it a bullet-riddled blast that expands the mythology and delivers relentless, well-choreographed gunplay and hand-to-hand fights. A clumsy opening prologue is critiqued, but the fun action and anticipation for the next chapter are praised.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
11 February 2017 · Angus Wolfe Murray
75*

The critic emphasizes the film's extreme violence and body count, positioning John Wick as a cool icon of modern action cinema in the vein of The Matrix. The relentless, stylized killing and memorable lines are highlighted as making it iconic entertainment.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate