Critics’ reviews

Judgment at Nuremberg (1961)

9 reviews from 9 publications. Critics’ score 77: 9 positive, 0 mixed, 0 negative.

Back to our review of Judgment at Nuremberg

77
Positive
9
Mixed
0
Negative
0

All nine reviews are favourable, and none is mixed or hostile. The praise clusters on two things. The first is the film’s seriousness about its subject: critics credit Kramer and Abby Mann with putting the question of how guilty those who followed orders were, and with refusing to answer it too neatly. The second is the cast. Spencer Tracy’s judge is singled out again and again as the calm centre of a three-hour picture, with Montgomery Clift’s shattered witness and Maximilian Schell mentioned almost as often.

The spread is narrow, and the reservations are about craft rather than purpose. Several reviews find the direction and screenplay conventional, with the courtroom material stretched and occasionally glib. Variety judges the film slower and baggier than the television version it grew from, and Radio Times thinks Kramer sweetens a grim story. The New Yorker rates it higher as a record of argument than as drama. Notably, the warmest reviews are the most recent; the notices from 1961 are more measured.

The Guardian
30 January 2013 · B+ (entertainment), A (history)
90*

Stanley Kramer's film is an exceptionally good historical drama that intelligently fictionalises the judges' trial while raising complex questions about responsibility, obedience and justice without easy answers.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
28 April 1994 · Patrick Mott
80*

The critic praises the 1961 courtroom drama for riveting attention on the moral issues of the Nuremberg trials and its ensemble cast. He singles out Stanley Kramer's taut direction and Abby Mann's screenplay for evoking moral outrage while depicting Germany's struggle with its past.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★★ · Tony Sloman
80

The trial material might not seem obvious for a film, but Kramer makes this three-hour saga mesmerising through dramatic flair and an all-star cast led by Tracy. The film has great dignity and star power that makes the grim tale watchable, though Kramer is accused of sugaring the pill.

Read the full review →
The Times
1 May 2004
80*

Kramer's courtroom epic is distinguished by its lack of absolutism as it explores even-handedly how culpable those who followed orders were; it features an impressive heavyweight cast including Tracy, Schell and others.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
16 December 1961 · Brendan Gill
70*

The picture is bold and continuously exciting despite its great length, posing formidable questions about individual and collective accountability that it intends viewers to answer seriously. As courtroom fiction it is only moderately successful, but forensically and as real life it is superb.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
20 December 1961 · Bosley Crowther
70*

The film pins a powerful persuasive statement on the fundamental issue of Nazi war guilt. It cuts through specious arguments to accomplish a fine dramatic statement of moral probity, though it is sometimes compressive and glib.

Read the full review →
Time Out
10 September 2012 · DT
70*

Kramer's film on the Holocaust features an impressive assembly of star turns in court, with Tracy's effortlessly brilliant performance as the superjudge and Clift's painfully convincing emotional disintegration standing out. There are no surprises in the direction or screenplay, but enough conviction rewards a patient spectator.

Read the full review →
Variety
31 December 1960
70*

The film is twice the size of the concise TV production, with a faster tempo and more trenchant script editing needed to punch it up. Tracy delivers a performance of great intelligence and intuition, creating a gentle but towering figure.

Read the full review →
Collider
28 June 2025
90*

The critic calls it one of the best legal thrillers ever made and among the bravest films of Hollywood's Golden Age. They single out its emotional depth, insightful exploration of justice and complicity, and the powerhouse ensemble cast including standout turns from Montgomery Clift and Judy Garland.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate