Critics’ reviews

King Kong (1933)

14 reviews from 14 publications. Critics’ score 81: 12 positive, 2 mixed, 0 negative.

Back to our review of King Kong

81
Positive
12
Mixed
2
Negative
0
Radio Times
★★★★★ · Andrew Collins
100

Arguably the monster movie of all time, this Beauty and the Beast tale has mythic power thanks to Willis O'Brien's pioneering animation and its tragic story. It offers an early eco-message as Kong is exploited for gain.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · Kim Newman
90*

The critic calls it a brilliantly structured adventure movie with a strong set-up on the island and effective rampage sequences in New York. They single out the stop-motion animation and character work on Kong as masterful.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
24 March 1989
90*

The piece celebrates the restored 1933 film as the ultimate Beauty-and-the-Beast fable whose innocence and excitement still endure, praising the restored footage and the sheer fun of its serial-like pacing. It singles out the indelible Empire State Building climax.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
3 February 2002 · Roger Ebert
90*

Ebert calls the film a landmark adventure whose stop-motion effects remain impressive and whose story of greed unleashing the beast still resonates. He singles out the pioneering special effects work of Willis O’Brien for particular praise.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
22 March 2021 · Mike D'Angelo
90*

The piece positions the film as arguably the first to synthesize cinematic spectacle into a sustained thrill-ride feature that influenced countless later blockbusters. It praises the strategic withholding of Kong, the exciting stop-motion action sequences, Max Steiner’s score, and the poignant climax atop the Empire State Building.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
2 March 2018 · THR Staff
90*

The review calls the film a great piece of imagination produced in grand style and good taste, most capably acted and directed. It highlights the beauty-and-the-beast story with much sympathy for the beast and praises the production values, sets, locations, and performances, especially Fay Wray.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
3 March 1933 · Mordaunt Hall
90*

Hall describes the picture as a fantastic and compelling tale of a gigantic ape captured and brought to New York, praising its vivid jungle sequences and the performances of Fay Wray and Robert Armstrong. He highlights the thrilling climax atop the Empire State Building.

Read the full review →
Time Out
13 March 2014 · WH
85*

The film retains its power to move, excite and sadden thanks to Willis O'Brien's animation and Max Steiner's score. The masterstroke is delaying Kong's entrance so he emerges as the most fully realised character.

Read the full review →
Variety
2 March 1933 · Bige.
70*

The review hails the picture as a gripping technical achievement that surpasses earlier efforts like The Lost World, crediting the sound effects, score and stop-motion work. It notes that audiences will marvel at how it was done despite some mechanical flaws.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
12 April 1933
50*

The film delivers more thrills than any since the advent of sound and caters successfully for tastes ranging from excitement to amusement. It begins strongly as an adventure but devolves into comedy amid excessive spectacle, though the technical achievements of the ape and monsters are impressive.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
11 March 1933
50*

The review finds the film excessive and grotesque yet diverting, likening its prehistoric creatures to a nightmare come to life. It notes the Beauty-and-the-Beast theme and feels a touch of sympathy for the defeated monster.

Read the full review →
/Film
5 October 2021 · Dalin Rowell
90*

The critic ranks the film #1 and calls it a masterpiece that set the gold standard for monster movies. They single out its groundbreaking storytelling, flawless pacing, exploration of man's greed, and heart-wrenching finale for praise.

Read the full review →
Collider
21 October 2010 · Andre Dellamorte
85*

The 1933 King Kong is a charming production with spectacle that still holds up, particularly the stop-motion effects and the humanity in Kong's eyes. It remains a delightful kid fantasy adventure story more than seventy years later.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
6 December 2005 · Gary Duncan
70*

The critic calls the 1933 film still the big daddy of all monster movies despite its age and rough edges. They single out Willis O'Brien's special effects and the iconic set pieces involving Kong for praise, while noting hammy acting and slow early pacing.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate