Critics’ reviews

Koyaanisqatsi (1983)

8 reviews from 8 publications. Critics’ score 54: 4 positive, 2 mixed, 2 negative.

Back to our review of Koyaanisqatsi

54
Positive
4
Mixed
2
Negative
2

The reviews are divided on Koyaanisqatsi, but praise consistently centres on its images and Philip Glass’s score. Even some sceptical critics acknowledge the sensory force of the film’s landscapes and accelerated urban activity, while admirers find the combination hypnotic and immersive. Ron Fricke’s time-lapse cinematography draws particular praise for making the contrast between nature and technology compelling without a conventional narrative.

The disagreement concerns what those images have to say, with responses ranging from enthusiastic admiration to outright rejection. Several critics find the contrast between unspoilt nature and modern civilisation simplistic, or question whether Reggio is too fascinated by urban life to condemn it convincingly. Time Out takes the harshest position, finding the ecological message condescending and its reliance on technology hypocritical. Collider reads that tension more generously, seeing a film that recognises human ingenuity and beauty alongside the environmental costs of progress.

RogerEbert.com
26 September 1983 · Roger Ebert
70*

The critic finds the film simplistic in contrasting pristine nature with human civilization's mess but praises its impressive visual and auditory experience created by Reggio and composer Philip Glass.

Read the full review →
Evening Standard
10 April 2012
50*

The time-lapse cameras on the American landscape deliver psychedelic visuals that were striking when premiered in 1983. There's nothing much for the mind to bite on and many effects have become over-used, though its appeal is directed entirely to the senses with Philip Glass's resonating score.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
17 September 2002 · Ed Gonzalez
50*

Reggio’s debut remains the most heartfelt entry in the Qatsi series, though it is not without structural and theoretical complications. The film’s synergy of natural beauty and urban decay contemplates a “life out of balance,” yet Reggio appears intoxicated with the very blight he questions.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
4 October 1982 · festival review · Vincent Canby
30*

The critic calls the non-narrative film slick, naive, chic, maddening and sometimes very beautiful, a hypnotic folly that evokes a psychedelic moviegoing experience through its images and Philip Glass score.

Read the full review →
Time Out
10 September 2012 · KJ
20*

The critic views the film as a condescending ecological documentary that uses time-lapse photography and Philip Glass's score to criticize modern technology and urban life while hypocritically relying on advanced technology to make its points.

Read the full review →
Collider
27 July 2022 · Joe Hoeffner
80*

The critic sees the film as a timeless marvel that captures humanity's ambivalent relationship with progress, lamenting its environmental costs while celebrating ingenuity and beauty, especially in the 'Grid' sequence.

Read the full review →
/Film
8 February 2021 · Ben Pearson
80*

The critic views the film as an immersive, hypnotic experience more than a traditional movie, praising its time-lapse cinematography by Ron Fricke and Philip Glass score for creating a powerful contrast between nature and technology. It notes the environmental message may leave viewers dispirited while scratching a wanderlust itch during quarantine.

Read the full review →
Consequence
16 July 2009
75*

The piece praises the film as a transcendent work of art fusing striking imagery with Philip Glass's powerful score into an unforgettable experience that explores themes of imbalance between humanity and nature.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate