Critics’ reviews

Legend (1985)

8 reviews from 8 publications. Critics’ score 49: 2 positive, 1 mixed, 5 negative.

Back to our review of Legend

49
Positive
2
Mixed
1
Negative
5

Most critics find Legend more persuasive as a visual fantasy than as a story, with praise clustering around its imagery, design and costumes. Even the less favourable reviews acknowledge the appeal of its fairy-tale setting, while Tim Curry’s Lord of Darkness receives particular praise for bringing some life to the proceedings. Tangerine Dream’s score also earns approval, though these strengths seldom outweigh complaints about thin characters and a lack of emotional involvement.

The disagreement centres on how much those visual pleasures can compensate for the storytelling. Slant Magazine offers the clearest defence, celebrating the film’s transportive style while acknowledging that character development suffers. The less enthusiastic reviews find the imagery insufficient, with reservations ranging from blunt symbolism and kitsch to a shortage of wit and invention. Across the relevant reviews, admiration for the craft is considerably more widespread than enthusiasm for the film.

Slant Magazine
13 October 2021 · ★★★★ · Rocco T. Thompson
80

Thompson praises the Arrow Video edition as a stellar release that gives fans little reason to want more. He highlights the film’s transportive visual style and Tangerine Dream score, while noting the trade-off of style over character development.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
13 September 2015 · Mark Kermode
70*

Kermode finds the film cartoonish but undeniably entertaining, with its attitude to the Krays’ glamour left deliberately ambiguous. He praises Tom Hardy’s committed, mesmerising dual performance as the twins.

Read the full review →
Time Out
· TCh
64*

The available metadata does not reveal the critic’s verdict. Its description singles out the Teutonic-myth framing and the Lord of Darkness’s unicorn-killing.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★ · Joanna Berry
40

Berry finds the film a daft fairy tale that director Ridley Scott might prefer to forget. She singles out Tim Curry’s performance as the Lord of Darkness as the film’s best feature.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
18 April 1986 · Kevin Thomas
35*

Thomas finds the film visually sumptuous but thin in substance and unlikely to hold most adults’ interest. He praises Tim Curry’s lively performance and Tangerine Dream’s score, while wishing the film had more wit and invention.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
11 June 2002 · Keith Phipps
30*

Phipps finds the film a visually appealing but intriguing failure, undone by its excess and lack of human depth. He singles out the striking imagery as a strength, while criticizing the story’s blunt symbolism and kitsch.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
21 August 2011 · Jennie Kermode
30*

The review finds the film visually admirable but an unsatisfying viewing experience. It praises the design and costumes, while criticizing dull characters and an emotionally empty story.

Read the full review →
The Wrap
19 November 2015
30*

The review finds the film a thin gangster saga, largely rescued by Tom Hardy’s performance. It praises Hardy’s strikingly distinct portrayals of the twins, while faulting the film’s schematic characterization and polished style.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate