Critics’ reviews

Lethal Weapon 4 (1998)

9 reviews from 9 publications. Critics’ score 49: 1 positive, 4 mixed, 4 negative.

Back to our review of Lethal Weapon 4

49
Positive
1
Mixed
4
Negative
4

The reviews lean mixed to negative, with only one plainly positive notice among nine. Where there is praise, it clusters in the same two places: Jet Li’s fighting, which several critics call the best thing the fourth film adds, and the easy rapport among the returning cast, whose verbal sparring is credited even by those who dislike everything around it. The action set-pieces are generally granted professional execution, and the freeway chase comes up more than once.

The complaints are about the story and the jokes. Most critics find the plot thin or illogical, the humour tired and the running time padded, and there is a recurring sense that the series has run out of steam and its leads are going through the motions. The spread is wide. Variety is the lone enthusiast, calling it buoyant popcorn fare, while the Los Angeles Times declares it creatively bankrupt and Eye for Film says it wastes Li. Two notices are partial, so the picture is less firm than the count suggests.

Variety
8 July 1998 · Leonard Klady
75*

Klady finds the film buoyant, entertaining popcorn fare despite its illogical plot and nihilistic violence. He praises the performances, especially Chris Rock’s comic addition, and singles out the freeway chase and duel for their spectacle.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
10 July 1998
65*

The headline presents the film as an action comedy driven by its familiar stars. It singles out the mix of physical mayhem and jokes, but the blocked article leaves the critic’s overall verdict unclear.

Read the full review →
Time Out
· NF
64*

The page labels this a film review, but provides no review text. Its verdict and any specifically praised or criticized element therefore cannot be determined.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
10 July 1998 · ★★½/4 · Roger Ebert
62

Ebert finds the film entertaining but overly reliant on the series’ familiar formula. He singles out the chemistry among the returning characters as its chief strength.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★ · John Ferguson
60

Ferguson says the fourth film is a slight improvement over the third, though it still feels like the cast is going through the motions. He praises Jet Li’s fighting skills as the most notable new addition.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · Andrew Collins
40*

The critic finds the sequel entertaining but the weakest entry in the series, with a disappointing sense that the franchise has run out of steam. The returning leads’ verbal sparring is praised, while the action is faulted for straining to feel original.

Read the full review →
Total Film
18 September 1998 · ★★ · Total Film
40

The review finds the sequel overlong, unfunny, and a poor fit for its aging heroes. It praises the action set-pieces and Jet Li’s villain, while faulting the humor and story.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
10 July 1998 · Kenneth Turan
10*

Turan condemns the film as creatively bankrupt and lacking a worthwhile plot. He credits the action sequences with professional execution and Jet Li’s martial arts with adding welcome intensity.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
19 January 2001 · Angus Wolfe Murray
20*

The critic finds the film a disappointing, padded buddy movie with a weak thriller plot. Jet Li’s martial arts skills are singled out for praise, though the review says the film wastes his potential.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate