Critics’ reviews

Life Is Sweet (1991)

7 reviews from 7 publications. Critics’ score 85: 7 positive, 0 mixed, 0 negative.

Back to our review of Life Is Sweet

85
Positive
7
Mixed
0
Negative
0

All seven reviews are positive, with praise clustering around Leigh’s feel for family life and his ability to let comedy coexist with distress. Most critics find emotional depth beneath the characters’ eccentric behaviour, crediting the improvisational method with performances that feel spontaneous and psychologically precise. Time Out singles out Broadbent and Steadman, while other reviews stress the strength of the family relationships. The everyday rhythms and ordinary struggles provide much of the film’s appeal.

The differences are chiefly in enthusiasm and emphasis, rather than any substantial disagreement. The New Yorker offers the most restrained assessment, describing a meandering passage through modest incidents but finding emotional intimacy and unpredictability along the way. The AV Club places particular weight on characters who initially resemble caricatures before revealing deeper troubles. Across the reviews, the loose plotting attracts less concern than admiration for what Leigh discovers within it.

RogerEbert.com
24 December 1991 · ★★★★/4 · Roger Ebert
100

The film makes discoveries alongside its characters through Leigh's improvisational method, blending humor and poignancy into a masterpiece about family life. It stands out for its spontaneous feel and deep insight into ordinary struggles.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
30 May 2013 · Chuck Bowen
90*

The review calls it one of Leigh's best, a tough compassionate study of a British family that gained him global esteem. It singles out the nuanced, ambiguous title and the rich, heartbreaking mother-daughter confrontation as exemplars of Leigh's ability to reveal desperation behind clownish facades.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
13 November 1991 · Kenneth Turan
85*

Leigh's eccentric film is surreal yet real, with nothing happening yet everything experienced in a working-class Enfield family. Its success stems from impeccable psychological pitch and willingness to take wild chances.

Read the full review →
Time Out
10 September 2012 · SGr
85*

Leigh's improvisational method creates symmetry through contrasting chefs and twin daughters in this follow-up to High Hopes. The film mixes enormous fun with sad subjects like enterprise failure and adolescent despair, highlighted by strong performances from Broadbent and Steadman.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
29 May 2013 · B+ · Sam Adams
83

The critic praises Leigh's delicate balancing act with improv-derived characters that start as caricatures but reveal deeper pathologies and emotional truths. The film is highlighted for its magic social realism, blending grotesque comedy with heartfelt family dynamics in a way that restores balance to Leigh's reputation for comedies.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
25 October 1991
80*

Leigh's contemplative comedy captures a lower-middle-class north London family in the post-Thatcher era, where routine shapes lives amid subtle tensions. It breathes with authentic performances and everyday rhythms rather than plot-driven drama.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
28 October 1991
75*

Leigh's exuberant domestic portrait of an ordinary Middlesex family avoids stereotypes, treating characters with emotional intimacy and unpredictability. It builds to a powerful mother-daughter confrontation after meandering through modest, unspectacular moments.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate