Critics’ reviews

Looper (2012)

21 reviews from 21 publications. Critics’ score 76: 18 positive, 2 mixed, 1 negative.

Back to our review of Looper

76
Positive
18
Mixed
2
Negative
1

Most critics welcome Looper as intelligent, entertaining science fiction, with praise clustering around Rian Johnson’s writing and the performances of Joseph Gordon-Levitt and Bruce Willis. The reviews admire its combination of time-travel complications, forceful action and character drama, often finding emotional weight in its questions about family, identity and violence. Its wit and grounded world also earn approval, though critics differ on how much thought its ideas reward afterwards.

Reservations centre on logical inconsistencies and a slower middle section, with several otherwise enthusiastic reviews finding the shift away from the early urban action less successful. The spread is largely positive, but the dissent is firm: The Guardian enjoys the performances while questioning whether the premise withstands scrutiny. The Wrap is markedly harsher, finding that a promising thriller becomes padded and incoherent, with Gordon-Levitt’s make-up an additional distraction.

Radio Times
★★★★★ · Damon Wise
100

This fast-paced gritty sci-fi thriller satisfies fans of both popcorn thrills and intelligent genre storytelling with its head-spinning time-travel plot and smart questions about destiny and identity; the action, ideas and lead performances are highlighted.

Read the full review →
Screen Daily
6 September 2012 · festival review
85*

Rian Johnson’s Toronto opener is a spectacularly cool time-twisting sci-fi thriller that shows smarts and action-adventure can go hand-in-hand, with a smart script, visually stunning sequences and great performances that make it gripping and provocative.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
26 September 2012 · Chris Cabin
85*

The critic praises Johnson's deft storytelling and emotional palette that elevates familiar tropes, highlighting the film's pacing, character conflicts, and critique of violence as a choice rather than glorification.

Read the full review →
Total Film
6 September 2012 · James Mottram
85*

The critic hails Looper as an extraordinary, conceptually bold time-travel tale with intricate plotting, emotional depth around family and redemption, and striking production design. Minor flaws include some logic issues and a dip in pace during the farmhouse scenes, but overall it is a home run.

Read the full review →
Empire
· Kim Newman
80*

The review praises Looper for its crackling dialogue, unusual characterisations, well-thought-out world and emotional core despite some plot quibbles. It highlights the film's brain, courage and heart, calling it intelligent science-fiction that succeeds where others falter.

Read the full review →
Little White Lies
12 September 2012 · 3/4/3 · Matt Bochenski
80

The critic calls it the most resourceful, vivacious and savage science fiction movie of 2012, praising its stylish, violent and daring vision that succeeds through sheer confidence despite tangled plot elements.

Read the full review →
Time Out
7 September 2012 · ★★★★ · Tom Huddleston
80

Johnson strikes an effective balance between conceptual cleverness and multiplex thrills in this hugely satisfying time-travel sci-fi, though it has logical inconsistencies and slow spells; the performances, especially Bruce Willis, are singled out for praise.

Read the full review →
Evening Standard
7 September 2012 · festival review
75*

The critic describes Looper as futuristic, violent and noisy but highly enjoyable in its first half, with savvy direction and fun action sequences full of cult movie allusions. It sags a little in the later sections but remains savvy, nasty fun overall.

Read the full review →
Film Comment
· John Wildman
75*

Johnson's sci-fi thriller lets viewers forget it's sci-fi while enjoying it, choosing a grounded path over flashy effects. The director's ideas are laced with mordant wit, making the film entertaining though not deeply thought-provoking after viewing.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
24 September 2012 · Anthony Lane
70*

The critic notes many clever things about the film, especially the casting coup of having two actors play the same role across time, and finds a strange, befuddling joy in its time-travel complications despite the mental effort required. The premise creates queasy sensations through its handling of tenses and physics-defying elements.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
28 September 2012 · Manohla Dargis
70*

The critic describes the film as an obstreperously entertaining science-fiction pastiche that mixes genre thrills with high-art aspirations through wit, sharp editing, and clever allusions. It spins a fast-moving entertainment from a time-travel premise while leaving some genre fundamentals dusty.

Read the full review →
The Times
28 September 2012 · Wendy Ide
70*

Rian Johnson's sharply written sci-fi thriller has a killer central premise involving time travel used by organised crime, with a twisting switchback story and terrific supporting turn from Emily Blunt; it mixes references to Children of Men, Memento and The Matrix but has a slight reservation about the prosthetic make-up on Gordon-Levitt.

Read the full review →
The Independent
29 September 2012
65*

The critic finds Looper a brainy, idiosyncratic thriller with strong performances and atmosphere in its first half, but notes it loses momentum and originality once Bruce Willis appears. It is compared unfavorably to The Terminator or a Terrence Malick film in its second half.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
30 September 2012 · Peter Bradshaw
50*

Rian Johnson's time-travel sci-fi action picture is a return to form after The Brothers Bloom, ringing ingenious changes on familiar material like The Terminator with help from strong performances by Joseph Gordon-Levitt, Bruce Willis, Jeff Daniels and Emily Blunt. It courts the adjective 'thoughtful' but does not stand up to much thinking about.

Read the full review →
Den of Geek
8 September 2012 · Ryan Lambie
85*

Rian Johnson mixes familiar genre elements in a refreshingly individual way, delivering one of the best sci-fi thrillers of the year. The cast, especially Gordon-Levitt and Willis, excels, with Johnson's writing and direction standing out for its enthusiasm and intelligence.

Read the full review →
/Film
6 September 2012 · 8.5/10 · Germain Lussier
85

The film succeeds by using sci-fi elements to explore universal themes and character drama, with innovative time-travel ideas and strong performances, though the second act's pacing shift is a minor distraction.

Read the full review →
NME
27 September 2012 · Owen Nicholls
85*

Rian Johnson's latest is clever, inventive, and witty, twisting the mind with philosophical questions while delivering expected action. Minor faults like flashy edits and a mid-section lag don't detract from it being the best sci-fi film of the year.

Read the full review →
The Playlist
26 September 2012 · B+ · The Playlist Staff
83

The critic praises the film's originality as one of the most unique sci-fi pieces in years, strong performances from Gordon-Levitt and Willis, and Johnson's growth as a filmmaker with visually striking and thematically rich storytelling.

Read the full review →
Digital Spy
24 September 2012 · Emma Dibdin
80*

Rian Johnson's time-travel noir is a pulpy and cerebral pleasure that excels in its pacy urban section and grounded performances but falters when straying from its pitch-black beginnings. It ranks among the most exciting sci-fi films of the century for its intricate world and sharp characters.

Read the full review →
Collider
28 September 2012 · B · Matt Goldberg
77

The critic praises the strong performances from Joseph Gordon-Levitt and Bruce Willis along with the inventive first half focused on self-preservation themes. The second half suffers from a tonal shift, new characters, and plot shortcuts that weaken the storytelling despite keeping the core ideas intact.

Read the full review →
The Wrap
27 September 2012
30*

The film starts with promise as a smart and stylish time-travel thriller but loses momentum and coherence in the middle, becoming padded and meandering. The critic singles out the distracting makeup on Joseph Gordon-Levitt for particular complaint.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate