Critics’ reviews

Lost in Translation (2003)

14 reviews from 14 publications. Critics’ score 87: 9 positive, 0 mixed, 0 negative.

Back to our review of Lost in Translation

87
Positive
9
Mixed
0
Negative
0

The consensus is strongly positive, with praise centred on Bill Murray and Scarlett Johansson’s restrained performances and Sofia Coppola’s handling of loneliness, humour and tentative intimacy. Most critics find Murray’s weary warmth particularly affecting, while Johansson earns praise for making her character’s unhappiness felt without overstatement. The reviews repeatedly credit Coppola with allowing the connection to develop through shared feelings and small observations, and with making Tokyo’s disorientating surroundings an important part of the film’s melancholy and comedy.

The differences are chiefly in the degree of enthusiasm rather than any fundamental disagreement about the film’s merits. Even the more measured responses admire the performances and the balance of sadness and humour; substantial reservations are scarce in these accounts. Eye for Film offers a specific caveat, finding the portrayal of Japanese characters and culture somewhat condescending, while still describing the film as touching and surprisingly funny.

Radio Times
★★★★★ · Adam Smith
100

The critic praises Bill Murray's delicately restrained and masterful performance as world-weary actor Bob Harris and Scarlett Johansson's equally good turn as the unhappily married younger woman. Coppola underpins the bittersweet soul-searching with humour and produces a sad, funny, magical and almost irresistibly moving experience using the Tokyo backdrop.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
12 September 2003 · ★★★★/4 · Roger Ebert
100

The critic praises the film as sweet, sad, sardonic and funny, highlighting the connection between two lost souls in Tokyo who share personal feelings rather than rushing into a physical relationship.

Read the full review →
Empire
· Rob Fraser
90*

The critic calls it a triumph that restores faith in cinema, praising its eloquent handling of themes like alienation and connection alongside comedy and romance. They single out the delicate beauty of the growing romance, especially the electric karaoke lounge moment between Murray and Johansson.

Read the full review →
Evening Standard
10 April 2012 · Neil Norman
85*

The critic describes it as a marvellous, exquisite movie and one of the films of the year, lauding Coppola's assured direction and command of film grammar from slim material. They single out Murray's layered, best screen performance as the wearily bewildered actor alongside Johansson's luminous, understated turn.

Read the full review →
Screen Daily
1 September 2003
85*

Sofia Coppola proves she is a chip off the old block with an enormously accomplished, highly affecting story of loneliness and human connection possessing originality, style and generosity. It singles out the extraordinary Tokyo setting as the third star of the film along with two superior performances from Bill Murray and Scarlett Johansson.

Read the full review →
Variety
31 August 2003
85*

The review describes the film as generating an out-of-body feeling with perceptiveness and maturity, coaxing an evocative sense of unarticulated sentiments through its two central performances and wry observation of contemporary Japan.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
8 September 2003 · David Denby
80*

The critic notes Coppola's observational style and praises Murray's quiet, wary, subtly acid yet warm performance as a movie star adrift in Tokyo, highlighting the film's focus on melancholy and unarticulated desire.

Read the full review →
Time Out
3 May 2011 · NB
80*

Sofia Coppola's film is a deft, manifold delight, a comedy of dislocation framing a love story bound up in existential melancholy. It singles out Bill Murray's infinitely modulated performance as underpinning the film, with Scarlett Johansson also impressing.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
19 August 2003 · Ed Gonzalez

Coppola's follow-up to The Virgin Suicides finds two lost souls connecting amid Tokyo's alienating yet seductive landscape. The director captures the humor and melancholy of cultural dislocation without contempt, celebrating personal growth through subtle visual and tonal mastery.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
9 September 2003 · Nathan Rabin

The film is an audacious dramatic comedy suffused with bittersweet melancholy, driven by Murray and Johansson's electric chemistry and Coppola's strong mastery of tone. Gorgeously shot, it establishes Coppola as a major filmmaker while reconfirming the leads' depth and power.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
9 January 2004 · Peter Bradshaw

The critic calls it an insouciant triumph and a funky little Brief Encounter for the new century, praising Coppola for conjuring a terrifically funny, heartbreakingly sad and swooningly romantic movie from almost nowhere with lightness of touch and intelligent direction.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
12 September 2003 · Critic’s Pick · Elvis Mitchell

The review calls the film a touching comic melodrama that connects with classic yearning stories and celebrates dislocated people discovering life amid sleep deprivation, singling out Bill Murray's performance.

Read the full review →
The Times
8 January 2004 · James Christopher

The critic praises the beguiling Japanese brief encounter as more culturally honest than The Last Samurai, highlighting Murray’s funny, flaky performance as a has-been star and Johansson’s potent, languid portrayal of anguished loneliness in a modern limbo.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
8 January 2004 · David Haviland
75*

The critic finds the film touching and surprisingly funny, praising the understated performances of Bill Murray and Scarlett Johansson along with the surreal, dream-like quality of its Tokyo setting. Minor reservations are noted about the film's condescending portrayal of Japanese characters and culture.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate