Critics’ reviews

Love Story (1970)

8 reviews from 8 publications. Critics’ score 54: 3 positive, 2 mixed, 3 negative.

Back to our review of Love Story

54
Positive
3
Mixed
2
Negative
3

The reviews divide almost evenly, and the split runs along the calendar: critics writing in 1970 mostly like it, and critics writing since mostly do not. Where there is praise, it clusters on Arthur Hiller’s direction, which several reviews credit with giving Erich Segal’s thin story colour, detail and a sense of place. Ryan O’Neal draws the warmest notices among the cast, with John Marley and Ray Milland noted in support; Ali MacGraw is admired by some and doubted by others.

The reservations are about the material rather than the making. The later reviews call the characters flat, the tragedy contrived and the values regressive, and Empire wonders what anyone who knows the ending is meant to get from it beyond a cry. The spread could hardly be wider. Slant finds it close to unwatchable, singling out the over-lit faces and the wedding scene; Variety, at the other end, thinks it succeeds on every level.

Variety
31 December 1969 · Variety Staff
90*

Love Story is an excellent film that succeeds on all artistic levels, propelled by strong performances especially from Ryan O'Neal and solid support from John Marley and Ray Milland. Hiller's direction and the story of young love tested by terminal illness make it generally successful.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
1 January 1970 · Roger Ebert
80*

The film is infinitely better than the book thanks to Arthur Hiller's direction, which adds color, character, personality, detail and background. Ali MacGraw and Ryan O'Neal bring the leads to life and make viewers care about the tragic story.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
24 December 1970 · Vincent Canby
70*

The movie is a beautiful, romantic fantasy about perfect young love that ends in death, executed with seeming simplicity by Hiller and anchored by lovely performances from MacGraw and O'Neal. It is a sophisticated commercial entertainment that will likely spawn many inferior imitations.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
6 September 2019 · Tom Breihan
60*

The piece presents Love Story as a conventional, old-fashioned romance that succeeded by offering boomers a reassuring myth of their own, praising its clean naturalistic filmmaking, locations, and music while criticizing the flat characters, regressive values, and contrived tragedy.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
26 December 1970
60*

The film is a calculated tearjerker pushed as clean and wholesome entertainment, succeeding in conveying emotional commitment within a contemporary setting through Hiller's sensitive and restrained direction. It is contrasted with the even more promoted and successful novelization.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · William Thomas
40*

Erich Segal's bestseller is very much of its time and gave the world the line 'Love means never having to say you're sorry'. Ali MacGraw cannot act but dies prettily amid violins while the known ending makes the point of watching unclear unless one likes crying.

Read the full review →
Time Out
29 February 2012 · GA
20*

The critic dismisses the film as a bland and clichéd tale of love and illness that feels dated even at the time of release, leading viewers through a turgid story of Harvard students whose romance ends in separation.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
8 February 2012 · Jaime N. Christley
10*

The critic deems the film one of the most unendurable classics, with atrocious direction, performances, and script that make viewing a form of self-harm. He singles out the visual style, over-lit faces, and the DIY wedding scene for particular scorn while noting the Blu-ray transfer preserves the original's flaws.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate