Most critics find Magic Mike more fun than they expected and less than they hoped. The praise clusters on the dance sequences, which nearly everyone calls energetic and well shot, and on the two lead performances: Channing Tatum is singled out as a proper star, and Matthew McConaughey’s strip-club boss is the turn most often named as the film’s highlight. Soderbergh’s unhurried, non-judgemental way with the backstage world is widely admired. The reservations cluster on the story. Several reviews say the film is strong for its first half and then slackens into conventional plot threads and an underpowered romance, and The New Yorker goes further, calling the moral uplift of the final act close to hypocrisy after the sleaze that precedes it. The spread is fairly wide. The Guardian thinks the film never gets under its characters’ skin or takes a real risk, and The Wrap alone finds the whole thing dull, stripping included.
E
Empire
2 July 2012 · Kim Newman
80*
Soderbergh delivers a fun yet serious look at the male stripping world that showcases Channing Tatum's talents and Matthew McConaughey's standout performance. The film offers terrific entertainment with wry melancholia despite some wavering in the final act.
Read the full review →T
Time Out
10 July 2012 · ★★★★ · Cath Clarke
80
Soderbergh brings his signature grungy style to a fun, throwaway tale of male strippers that will appeal to its target audience despite a routine script. The dance sequences are hilarious and the camp backstage world is captured well, with strong turns from Tatum and especially McConaughey.
Read the full review →E
Evening Standard
16 July 2012
60*
The film starts with promising material about male strippers but settles into a pleasant, undemanding soap opera where everyone's troubles resolve happily. It succeeds mainly through its energetic and corny strip routines filmed in a convincing style, making performative male sexuality seem wholesome.
Read the full review →R
Radio Times
★★★ · Adam Smith
60
Soderbergh’s surprisingly sweet-natured tale of Florida male strippers offers more than just stripping, with strong performances and beautiful shooting, though it feels dramatically underpowered and avoids real sleaze. Tatum gives a star-making turn but the film doesn’t fully commit.
Read the full review →N
The New Yorker
2 July 2012 · David Denby
60*
The first three-quarters of the film is great fun, with strong performances especially from Matthew McConaughey and Channing Tatum's dynamite dancing, creating an easy rhythm in the strip club setting. However, it turns into a conventional morality play that borders on hypocrisy by selling the sleaze then pushing moral uplift.
Read the full review →G
The Guardian
15 July 2012 · Peter Bradshaw
40*
Soderbergh's film about male strippers in Florida is oddly innocent and well-tempered but fails to get under the characters' skin or take real risks. It is not especially original and avoids deeper issues like aging or exploitation.
Read the full review →F
Financial Times
12 July 2012 · Nigel Andrews
Soderbergh delivers a ridiculously enjoyable tale of male strippers that blends comedy, voyeurism, love, conflict and dance with an ironic moral. Channing Tatum gives a nuanced performance with sensational bodywork.
Read the full review →H
The Hollywood Reporter
24 June 2012 · David Rooney
Soderbergh delivers a raunchy, funny, and nonjudgmental comedy-drama about male strippers that balances sex appeal with heart and male camaraderie. The critic praises the energetic performances, especially Tatum and McConaughey, and the lively strip routines while noting some narrative familiarity.
Read the full review →N
The New York Times
28 June 2012 · NYT Critic’s Pick · Manohla Dargis
Soderbergh delivers a funny, enjoyable romp about male strippers and the American dream, with Channing Tatum as a terrific lead who works the crowd like no one else. The film showcases the hip-pumping energy of the dancers and grounds the story in relatable ambitions and realities.
Read the full review →V
Variety
24 June 2012 · Peter Debruge
This breezy, low-calorie fun offers more entertainment than any Soderbergh film since Ocean's Eleven, with Tatum and the hunks delivering a guiltless girls' night out and strong showcase for dance moves. Soderbergh is in excellent form, re-embracing professional techniques while keeping a nonjudgmental, anthropological tone toward the stripping world.
Read the full review →V
Vulture
29 June 2012 · David Edelstein
Soderbergh's film is an enjoyable, arty take on the male-stripper world that emphasizes pleasure and choice over moralizing, with strong turns from Tatum and especially McConaughey. The strip sequences stand out as energetic and free of the director's usual repulsion, making it effective soft-core entertainment.
Read the full review →C
Collider
28 June 2012 · B · Matt Goldberg
77
The critic finds it an enjoyable and thoughtful exploration of sexual objectification and gender roles through stripping performances, praising the choreography and performances, but criticizes the underdeveloped conventional love story.
Read the full review →/
/Film
30 June 2012 · 7/10 · Adam
70
The film is an observational and subtle take on the male stripping world that avoids seedy sensationalism. It delivers on the expected dance sequences and physical appeal while exploring the limitations of that lifestyle.
Read the full review →D
Den of Geek
28 June 2012 · ★★★ · Luke Savage
60
The first half is strong thanks to Soderbergh's unhurried, observational style and engaging character moments, but the film loses focus in the second half as it tries to cover too many conventional plot threads at once. McConaughey's charismatic, layered turn as the strip-club boss stands out as the film's highlight.
Read the full review →W
The Wrap
28 June 2012 · Alonso Duralde
30*
The critic finds the film dull and repetitive, especially the stripping sequences, and criticizes the slight, familiar story and lack of interesting characters. Soderbergh's attempt to comment on the economy is seen as less effective than in his prior work.
Read the full review →Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate