Critics’ reviews

Magnolia (1999)

11 reviews from 11 publications. Critics’ score 86: 7 positive, 0 mixed, 0 negative.

Back to our review of Magnolia

86
Positive
7
Mixed
0
Negative
0

Most critics respond warmly to Magnolia’s ambition, emotional intensity and ensemble acting. Praise centres on Tom Cruise’s abrasive motivational speaker, though the reviews also find much to admire across the interlocking stories of loneliness, regret and coincidence. Anderson’s willingness to depart from conventional storytelling is widely seen as a strength. Even critics who find the film unwieldy describe its individual scenes and performances as compelling enough to sustain its considerable length.

The reservations concern repetition, an abrasive tone and whether all these lives add up to enough. The spread runs from enthusiastic approval to admiration with substantial qualifications, rather than outright rejection. Time Out finds the film self-indulgent and clumsy but still enthralling. The New Yorker raises a more fundamental objection: beneath the strong acting, fluid camerawork and pungent writing, its ideas seem commonplace and the whole fails to cohere. Most critics are more persuaded by the ambition and performances.

Radio Times
★★★★★ · Jason Caro
100

Anderson seals his reputation with this dark, daring epic that boldly discards storytelling conventions for a frantic, unpredictable portrait of Valley lives. The superb ensemble, especially Tom Cruise as the arrogant sex guru, and the Twilight Zone climax are singled out for praise.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
17 March 2000 · Peter Bradshaw
85*

Anderson establishes himself as one of the most exciting directors with this sprawling ensemble of broken lives in the San Fernando Valley, linked by coincidence and regret. The critic praises the standout performances, especially Tom Cruise's, while noting the film's length and intensity may overwhelm some viewers.

Read the full review →
Total Film
17 March 2000
85*

The review calls Magnolia a compelling, multi-faceted drama that never outstays its three-hour welcome despite minor sags. It singles out Tom Cruise's fantastic turn and some unforgettable story tweaks as reasons not to dismiss it as a Short Cuts rip-off.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · Kim Newman
80*

The critic sees Anderson's debt to Altman but notes the film sprawls and sometimes repeats itself, yet contains as much great stuff scene by scene as any picture that year. He singles out Tom Cruise's career-best performance as a total bastard along with the fresh and suspenseful work from John C. Reilly and Melora Walters.

Read the full review →
Sight and Sound
1 April 2000 · Leslie Dick
80*

The critic finds Magnolia a sprawling, anti-patriarchal epic that doubles its dysfunctional family stories across the San Fernando Valley and succeeds through sheer nerve and ambition. She singles out Tom Cruise's performance as the film's standout element worth the price of admission.

Read the full review →
Time Out
· GA
75*

The review calls the film over-ambitious, self-indulgent and clumsy yet one of the most enthralling American movies in years. It praises the bold, imaginative deus ex machina climax that feels as grand as a Biblical plague.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
17 December 1999 · Kenneth Turan

The critic calls it a frantic, flawed, fascinating film that is both impressive and a bit out of control, drunk on the pure joy of making movies, with dazzling energy, fine acting, and a zest for cinema that makes the three-plus hours engaging despite some predictable emotional payoffs. It highlights the role of coincidence and chance as a key element.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
13 December 1999 · David Denby

The critic describes it as a carnival of acting filled with startling arias of complaint and a richer film than Boogie Nights thanks to its fluid camera style and pungent writing, but notes that it doesn't really add up and is ultimately a "great terrible movie" with commonplace ideas. It highlights strong performances, especially from Jason Robards and William H. Macy.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
17 December 1999 · Janet Maslin

The critic praises the film's artfully orchestrated symphony of interconnected L.A. stories and its showcase for splendid acting, with Tom Cruise's surprising turn as the strutting motivational speaker Frank Mackey as a standout highlight. It notes the haunting collage of coincidences, fate, and emotional confrontations that give the sprawling narrative greater power.

Read the full review →
Variety
9 December 1999 · Emanuel Levy

The critic praises the ambitious scope and grand operatic style that confirm Anderson as one of Hollywood's most audacious filmmakers, along with a superlative ensemble cast that gives the meditation on fate and interconnection the aura of a major work. It notes flaws including an excessive running time, largely downbeat tone, and abrasive style that will limit commercial appeal.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
19 January 2001 · ★★★★★ · Angus Wolfe Murray
100

The critic finds Anderson's ensemble drama a compelling, risk-taking portrait of interconnected lives in the San Fernando Valley, marked by loneliness and strange coincidences. Exceptional performances, especially from Jason Robards and Philip Seymour Hoffman, and a superbly constructed script stand out as highlights.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate