Critics’ reviews

Margin Call (2011)

18 reviews from 18 publications. Critics’ score 71: 12 positive, 3 mixed, 3 negative.

Back to our review of Margin Call

71
Positive
12
Mixed
3
Negative
3

Most critics think well of it. The reviews return again and again to Chandor’s script and the ensemble: Spacey, Irons, Tucci, Quinto and Bettany are named repeatedly, with Irons singled out more than once. Critics like that the bankers are treated as people rather than villains, and that the film neither excuses nor sneers at them. Several rank it among the best fictional treatments of the 2008 crisis, and Mamet is invoked more than once for the clipped, procedural dialogue.

The reservations are about talk. Even admirers concede a tendency to speechify, and the harsher reviews find the dialogue repetitive and the pacing sluggish, with characters who never quite become people. Time Out wants a moral outsider the film never provides. Collider goes further and calls its account of the crisis inaccurate. The spread is wide and has a pattern: the coldest notices come from the early festival screenings in January 2011, while the British release a year later is received far more warmly.

The Guardian
8 January 2012 · Peter Bradshaw
90*

Margin Call is the best fictional treatment of the current economic crisis, superior to Oliver Stone's Wall Street: Money Never Sleeps and comparable to the documentary Inside Job and Mamet's Glengarry Glen Ross in its precise, convincing dialogue and ensemble cast. The film unfolds as a taut thriller over 36 hours as a Wall Street firm confronts toxic assets and ruthless decisions to protect its own.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
21 October 2011 · David Denby
90*

The critic calls it one of the strongest American films of the year and the best Wall Street movie ever made, praising its focus on corporate manners, hierarchy, and the difficulty of confronting speculation with truth. He singles out the writing, acting, and the way it captures the protocols of power.

Read the full review →
Empire
20 December 2011 · Ian Freer
85*

The critic lauds the film's sharp, Mamet-influenced dialogue and superb ensemble that humanizes the bankers while exposing their moral myopia. It particularly praises the performances of Quinto, Tucci, Spacey, and Irons in this gripping, grown-up cautionary tale.

Read the full review →
The Independent
12 January 2012
85*

The critic praises Chandor's smart script and sympathetic handling of Wall Street characters facing the 2008 crisis. It highlights the film's tense sequence of meetings, pared-down financial language, and strong performances, especially from Tucci and Spacey.

Read the full review →
Total Film
3 January 2012 · Andrew Lowry
85*

The critic calls it a contender for the best Wall Street film for presenting characters as real people rather than caricatures. It highlights Chandor's subtle script and the ensemble's key moments of vulnerability that reveal the personal cost of the crisis.

Read the full review →
Evening Standard
10 April 2012
80*

The critic commends the film's realistic portrayal of a Wall Street firm's atmosphere during crisis and Chandor's even-handed approach that humanizes the characters without excusing them. It singles out the strong ensemble cast and the director's skill in orchestrating complex drama.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★★ · Andrew Collins
80

Chandor's assured debut dramatises a Lehman-like bank's frantic 36-hour reaction to the financial crisis. The claustrophobic office setting and strong ensemble, especially Spacey and Irons, humanise the disaster effectively.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
23 March 2011 · ★★★/4 · Nick Schager
75

The film is most assured in its sober, undramatic depiction of corporate greed and moral compromise, especially in quiet moments and the cast's authentic underplaying, though weighed down at times by speechifying.

Read the full review →
Screen Daily
25 January 2011 · festival review
70*

Chandor's debut packs boardroom drama into a tight 24-hour window at an investment firm facing toxic assets. A dream-team cast delivers polished writing and direction that keeps a familiar story afloat despite its timely but potentially tired subject.

Read the full review →
Time Out
10 January 2012 · ★★★ · Ben Walters
60

Chandor's debut is an ambiguous Wall Street procedural about a bank's overnight crisis response to toxic assets. Strong performances and accessible dialogue are undercut by a lack of moral perspective or outsider critique.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
26 January 2011 · festival review · Stephen Farber
40*

The film lacks urgency and fails to make the financial details accessible or gripping, leaving the moral dilemmas feeling dry and abstruse despite a strong cast.

Read the full review →
Digital Spy
13 January 2012 · ★★★★ · Ben Rawson-Jones
80

The critic praises the film's accessible portrayal of the financial crisis through well-defined characters and strong ensemble performances, particularly highlighting Jeremy Irons' standout role. It is commended as a taut, impactful thriller that avoids sensationalism.

Read the full review →
HeyUGuys
12 January 2012 · ★★★★ · Lisa Giles-Keddie
80

The film is a gripping, sophisticated drama that humanizes bankers during the 2008 crisis through strong ensemble performances, especially from Spacey, Bettany, and Irons, while exposing greed without judgment.

Read the full review →
The Wrap
20 October 2011
75*

The critic finds the film a savvy and involving look at the financial crisis, following employees over one night as they deal with impending doom. They single out the sharp ensemble performances, particularly those of Quinto, Irons, Moore, Spacey, and Bettany, for praise.

Read the full review →
The Skinny
31 October 2012 · ★★★ · Keir Roper-Caldbeck
60

The review notes the impressive cast and balanced approach to depicting the financial crisis without glorifying or demonizing the bankers, but criticizes the static, dialogue-heavy scenes that feel over-determined.

Read the full review →
Collider
21 October 2011 · C- · Matt Goldberg
50

The film is a simplistic and inaccurate portrayal of the financial crisis that fails to explain the machinations or assign responsibility, resulting in empty characters and little drama or insight. Kevin Spacey's performance as a morally conflicted executive provides the only real saving grace.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
11 February 2011 · Amber Wilkinson
40*

Chandor shows talent in directing and framing, with a strong cast, but the script is dull, overly repetitive in its exposition, and slows the pace while failing to make characters relatable.

Read the full review →
/Film
21 January 2011 · festival review · David Chen
20*

Despite strong performances and an intriguing premise, the film is undermined by repetitive dialogue, sluggish pacing, shallow characters, and a lack of emotional or dramatic depth.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate