Critics’ reviews

Master and Commander: The Far Side of the World (2003)

13 reviews from 13 publications. Critics’ score 77: 7 positive, 2 mixed, 0 negative.

Back to our review of Master and Commander: The Far Side of the World

77
Positive
7
Mixed
2
Negative
0

Most critics welcome Master and Commander: The Far Side of the World as an intelligent, character-led sea adventure. Praise centres on the detailed shipboard life, the force of the naval battles and Russell Crowe’s authority as Captain Aubrey. Paul Bettany also draws strong notices, with several reviews finding warmth and philosophical depth in the friendship between Aubrey and Dr Maturin. Peter Weir’s attention to daily routines gives the action a convincing setting without, for most critics, overwhelming the story.

The reservations concern pace, emotional involvement and how much pleasure survives the seriousness. Several reviews find that the middle stretch slackens, while Empire admires the realism but wants more fun and feeling. Slant Magazine offers the sharpest dissent, finding contrived conflicts and over-edited battles where others see convincing drama and excitement. The spread is chiefly between enthusiastic approval and qualified admiration, with a smaller strand finding the film handsome but dull.

RogerEbert.com
14 November 2003 · Roger Ebert
90*

The critic praises the film's exuberant yet intelligent sea adventure that re-creates the British navy world of 1805 with remarkable detail, turning battles into stages for character and personality. He singles out the central friendship between Captain Aubrey and Dr. Maturin for its philosophical depth and the performances of Russell Crowe and Paul Bettany.

Read the full review →
Evening Standard
10 April 2012 · Neil Norman
85*

Peter Weir's adaptation is a terrific, character-driven Boy's Own adventure with microscopic attention to historical detail and authentic sea battles. The enduring friendship between Aubrey and Maturin provides philosophical heart and moving contemplative moments.

Read the full review →
Screen Daily
5 November 2003
85*

The review highlights the film's intimate portrait of life at sea with rich detail and atmosphere, well-acted characters, and a satisfying pursuit story that makes for an old-fashioned but effective adventure romp. Russell Crowe's commanding performance is singled out as central to its appeal.

Read the full review →
Time Out
· WH
80*

The critic calls the film a rousing adventure with authentic seafaring detail, strong performances from Crowe and Bettany, and effective action and character psychology. A minor complaint is the tension-slackening Galapagos interlude, but overall it is praised as a fine old-fashioned Boy's Own yarn.

Read the full review →
Variety
10 November 2003 · Variety Staff
80*

The review highlights the film's return to realistic naval combat epic set in the Napoleonic Wars, praising its pedigree with Peter Weir directing and Russell Crowe starring. It emphasizes the realism of the battle sequences and strong awards potential across multiple categories.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
14 November 2003 · Kenneth Turan
75*

The critic lauds Russell Crowe's commanding performance as Capt. Jack Aubrey and the film's extraordinary authenticity and visual detail in re-creating the nautical world. He notes that while it aims for an intelligent epic, it succeeds primarily through its epic action qualities rather than emotional depth.

Read the full review →
Empire
· Colin Kennedy
65*

The film excels in its detailed realism and Russell Crowe's nuanced performance as Captain Jack Aubrey, with an exhilarating opening sea battle standing out. However, the middle section drags like a travelogue and the story lacks sufficient fun or emotional depth.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
7 November 2003 · Jeremiah Kipp
50*

The critic finds the film overly serious and dull despite strong period detail and Russell Crowe's star power. It criticizes the script for tacked-on conflicts and hyper-edited battles that fail to deliver swashbuckling excitement.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
10 November 2003 · Scott Tobias

The review highlights the film's impressive physical production values and authentic depiction of 19th-century warships. It singles out Russell Crowe's commanding performance as the standout element that elevates the cat-and-mouse naval drama.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
21 November 2003 · Philip French

Weir has fashioned a crackingly entertaining yarn, perhaps the most purely enjoyable film of the year, with Russell Crowe in an infectiously enjoyable role. The film features superb battle setpieces, authentic period detail, and a thrilling adventure that sags a bit in the middle but delivers breathtaking effects.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
14 November 2018 · Michael Rechtshaffen

The critic praises Peter Weir and Russell Crowe for delivering a compelling naval epic that balances character motivation with rousing action sequences. The film is noted for its strong adaptation of the source novels and immersive sea-bound storytelling.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
14 November 2003 · NYT Critic’s Pick · A. O. Scott

The critic calls the film stupendously entertaining and a magnificent demonstration of vigor and precision in adapting Patrick O'Brian's novels. He highlights its celebration of an idea of England and the way it distills the essence of the hero's charisma through sharp command and quick action.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
6 December 2006 · Scott Macdonald
80*

The critic calls it an elegant and handsome action film and a rousing adventure story that credits viewers with intelligence. They single out the strong performances by Russell Crowe and Paul Bettany along with the verisimilitude of the production design and the episodic screenplay.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate